On 08/30/2010 09:06 PM, D M German wrote: > > After my presentation at DebConf this year I was pointed to your efforts > on the Patch Tagging Guidelines. > > One thing I believe would be useful is if the patch included a > license. The simplest license would be "Same as patched code" but it > will clarify it.
Wouldn't this be redundant to debian/copyright, where the licensing terms should be present anyway? Also, if debian/copyright were in DEP5 format (and properly maintained), one should be able to deduce the full licensing terms for any given patch from it automatically. Regards, Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c7c2218.3060...@kvr.at
