On Friday 10 June 2016 03:26 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I was wondering what the Gitlab proponent's thoughts are on how the Issue
> tracker functionality of Gitlab should be used in a Debian context,
> particularly in how it might intersect/interact/conflict with the BTS.
We like to use it for
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I was wondering what the Gitlab proponent's thoughts are on how the Issue
> tracker functionality of Gitlab should be used in a Debian context,
> particularly in how it might intersect/interact/conflict with the BTS.
Also note that GitLab merge requests are numbered (I th
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I was wondering what the Gitlab proponent's thoughts are on how the Issue
> tracker functionality of Gitlab should be used in a Debian context,
> particularly in how it might intersect/interact/conflict with the BTS.
You can enable/disable it per proj
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:56:54AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I was wondering what the Gitlab proponent's thoughts are on how the Issue
> tracker functionality of Gitlab should be used in a Debian context,
> particularly in how it might intersect/interact/conflict with the BTS.
Gitlab suppor
I was wondering what the Gitlab proponent's thoughts are on how the Issue
tracker functionality of Gitlab should be used in a Debian context,
particularly in how it might intersect/interact/conflict with the BTS.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Dowland
Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:46:56PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> Let me rephrase, then: can we have a plan that addresses alioth / git /
> gitolite / gitlab / stuff rather than standing up yet another SCM/PM tool
> because it's shiny?
>
> This has more to do with delivering sustainable services w
Hi,
Am 8. Juni 2016 22:47:24 MESZ, schrieb Julien Cristau :
>On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 15:56:31 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
>> We’ll have to allow for some diversity, if only to try new paths (and
>> then, eventually, cut off old ones). Especially as long as there is
>> motivation.
>>
>I have
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 15:56:31 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> We’ll have to allow for some diversity, if only to try new paths (and
> then, eventually, cut off old ones). Especially as long as there is
> motivation.
>
I haven't seen much motivation to maintain alioth (especially the
fusionfo
]] Ian Jackson
> But what you are saying is that they must, right away, pick a fight
> with the administrators and users of the existing services. They have
> to declare their intent to obsolete it and write out a detailed plan
> on how everyone will have to change.
>
> I think that this would
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 02:55 PM, Michael Lustfield wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:47:46 +, Holger Levsen
> > mailto:hol...@layer-acht.org>> wrote:
> >>Thanks for this nice summary. It helped me understand things better.
> >
> > I'm... actually
On 06/08/2016 02:08 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 11:19 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> So, say I want to contribute to a project I don't normally work in. Steps
>> in alioth:
>>
>
> [...]
>
> Well, I would go this route:
>
> - git clone
> - hack
> - git commit -a -v
> - git format
On 06/08/2016 02:55 PM, Michael Lustfield wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:47:46 +, Holger Levsen
> mailto:hol...@layer-acht.org>> wrote:
>>Thanks for this nice summary. It helped me understand things better.
>
> I'm... actually gonna save this for later because it helps me understand
> the alio
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:47:46 +, Holger Levsen
wrote:
>Thanks for this nice summary. It helped me understand things better.
I'm... actually gonna save this for later because it helps me understand
the alioth workflow.
I'm still relatively fresh to Debian dev and can say, without any doubt,
ali
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:47:46 +, Holger Levsen
wrote:
>Thanks for this nice summary. It helped me understand things better.
What Holger says +1.
I must say that I like the discussion style shown in this thread up to
now. Please more of this friendly constructivism.
Greetings
Marc
--
On 06/08/2016 11:19 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
[...]
>
> So, say I want to contribute to a project I don't normally work in. Steps
> in alioth:
>
[...]
Well, I would go this route:
- git clone
- hack
- git commit -a -v
- git format-patch -1 --to=proj...@lists.alioth.debian.org | mailx -t
>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:16:54PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Luca Filipozzi writes ("Re: Genesis of the git.d.o/gitlab.d.o confusion (Was:
> Next steps for gitlab.debian)"):
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:19:09PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > > That spea
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 20:29 +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> Tell me an "easy" way to do merging in alioth,
I think perhaps it hasn't been made clear to folks on this thread that
gitlab is more like a github style thing (with a webui for PRs and
whatnot) rather than a more "traditional"/"simple" git h
Luca Filipozzi writes ("Re: Genesis of the git.d.o/gitlab.d.o confusion (Was:
Next steps for gitlab.debian)"):
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:19:09PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > That speaks more to the need of actually dropping the not-shiny-anymore
> > services rathe
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:19:09PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Git is not only for code hosting. It is also a tool for collaborating,
> even with people not formally affiliated with your project.
>
> So, say I want to contribute to a project I don't normally work in. Steps
> in alioth:
>
> -
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:19:09PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> But that doesn't mean we as a project have to run and keep maintaining
> >> all the things that were once shiney.
> >
> > +1
>
> That speaks more to the need of actually dropping the not-shiny-anymore
> services rather than blo
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 15:14:36 +0100, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On 08/06/16 15:10, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>>> Since usability is the main reason many people hate using alioth,
>
> Do people really hate Alioth if they're just using it for git
On ബുധന് 08 ജൂണ് 2016 07:44 വൈകു, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Do people really hate Alioth if they're just using it for git hosting?
> You do some ssh and make a repo and then you just pull and push as you
> would with anything else.
>
Tell me an "easy" way to do merging in alioth, and then let
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:14:36PM +0100, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On 08/06/16 15:10, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >> Since usability is the main reason many people hate using alioth,
>
> Do people really hate Alioth if they're just using it
Hi All,
On 08/06/16 15:10, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> Since usability is the main reason many people hate using alioth,
Do people really hate Alioth if they're just using it for git hosting?
You do some ssh and make a repo and then you just pull and push
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 08, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
>
> > Let me rephrase, then: can we have a plan that addresses alioth / git /
> > gitolite / gitlab / stuff rather than standing up yet another SCM/PM tool
> > because it's shiny?
> Since usability is the main reason man
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 13:46 + schrieb Luca Filipozzi:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:17:44PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >
> Let me rephrase, then: can we have a plan that addresses alioth / git /
> gitolite / gitlab / stuff rather than standing up yet another SCM/PM tool
> beca
On Jun 08, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> Let me rephrase, then: can we have a plan that addresses alioth / git /
> gitolite / gitlab / stuff rather than standing up yet another SCM/PM tool
> because it's shiny?
Since usability is the main reason many people hate using alioth,
"because it's shiny" is a
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:17:44PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 10:21 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > > Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help with
> > > migrating
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 10:21 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help with
> > migrating git.debian.org
>
> Whoah there. Running an official Debian gitlab in
29 matches
Mail list logo
