Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-26 Thread Yasuhiro Araki
Hi, I'm afraid I did not respond rapidly. I will try to add features on cdn.debian.net to support CNAME-to-CNAME. Anyone have a target date? 2013/6/7 Adam Borowski > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > Re cdn: > > > > IIRC the main blocker was that it plays w

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-06 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Re cdn: > > IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a bit > painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to DNSSEC. If you're not afraid of such hacks, CNAME-to-CNAME can simplify DNS

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Re cdn: >> >> IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a >> bit painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to >> DNSSEC. > > And it uses the location of the DNS

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-06-06 Thread Guido Günther
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:49:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: [..snip..] > If they told us we could call it Firefox without compromising our ability > to maintain the packages to the quality standards that Debian users > expect, we would happily change the branding back, because we know it's > con

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-06 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Re cdn: > > IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a bit > painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to DNSSEC. And it uses the location of the DNS resolver of the user, which we

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-05 Thread Raphael Geissert
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum (05/06/2013): >> Or, we could investigate whether one or the other could be made >> official? > > I guess Raphael and/or DSA would be happy to receive help, possibly on > the “make it production-ready” front (matching DSA's expectations, > etc.). But I'm no

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Lucas Nussbaum (05/06/2013): > On 02/06/13 at 16:18 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Le dimanche, 2 juin 2013 15.54:31, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > > > Marcin Kulisz (02/06/2013): > > > > Why not to use http://http.debian.net/ ? > > > > > > Surely the .net part of it? > > > > If that's th

Re: http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-05 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Wed, June 5, 2013 09:12, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 02/06/13 at 16:18 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> Le dimanche, 2 juin 2013 15.54:31, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : >> > Marcin Kulisz (02/06/2013): >> > > Why not to use http://http.debian.net/ ? >> > >> > Surely the .net part of it? >> >> I

http.debian.net / cdn.debian.net (Was: Feedback on Debian 7.0)

2013-06-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/06/13 at 16:18 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le dimanche, 2 juin 2013 15.54:31, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > > Marcin Kulisz (02/06/2013): > > > Why not to use http://http.debian.net/ ? > > > > Surely the .net part of it? > > If that's the reason, why do we have cdn.debian.net in the

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-06-02 Thread Erik Heil
Hello, Thanks for your feedback. As a user, I think Debbie and 7.0 is great. Mia have the latest software install, but you have other options. As first graphical editors, you have choices like Ex DMACS. Also, there are others. If you install a desktop environment, we will certainly get a graphic

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-06-02 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le dimanche, 2 juin 2013 15.54:31, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Marcin Kulisz (02/06/2013): > > Why not to use http://http.debian.net/ ? > > Surely the .net part of it? If that's the reason, why do we have cdn.debian.net in the list of mirrors used in d-i? I'm not against either but would prefer

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-06-02 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Marcin Kulisz (02/06/2013): > Why not to use http://http.debian.net/ ? Surely the .net part of it? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-06-02 Thread Marcin Kulisz
On 2013-06-02 11:06:40, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Du, 02 iun 13, 09:57:34, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > > > > It doesn't, see . As no mirror was > > chosen during the install, none is placed in sources. A default can > > of course be selected and commented out, provide

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-06-02 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Du, 02 iun 13, 09:57:34, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > > It doesn't, see . As no mirror was > chosen during the install, none is placed in sources. A default can > of course be selected and commented out, provided that such default > agrees with the increase in load.

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-06-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 2 June 2013 03:10, Russ Allbery wrote: > It would probably be a good idea for the installer to add commented-out > sources.list lines for the main archive, even if the installation is done > off-line. (Assuming that it doesn't, but Nikolas's experience seems to > indicate that it doesn't.) >

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-06-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Russ Allbery writes: > Nikolas Kallis writes: >> Another thing I am pissed off about is the lack of a graphical >> text-editor being included in Debian 7.0. The last time I checked, my >> calendar said 2013, and as so, would not expect a text-editor not being >> included in a desktop-environment

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-05-31 Thread Hashem Nasarat
On 06/01/2013 01:06 AM, Nikolas Kallis wrote: > > Another thing I am pissed off about is the lack of a graphical > text-editor being included in Debian 7.0. The last time I checked, my > calendar said 2013, and as so, would not expect a text-editor not > being included in a desktop-environment bas

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-05-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Thank you for your feedback! Nikolas Kallis writes: > Another thing I am pissed off about is the lack of a graphical > text-editor being included in Debian 7.0. The last time I checked, my > calendar said 2013, and as so, would not expect a text-editor not being > included in a desktop-environme

Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-05-31 Thread Nikolas Kallis
Hello, I am just checking out Debian 7.0 for the first time and so far I overall like it. Among other things, its sleek, I like the colour scheme, its completely open source, stable, and I have so far not been effected by a bug. There are a few things I don't like about it though, that I w