Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> (05/06/2013): > On 02/06/13 at 16:18 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Le dimanche, 2 juin 2013 15.54:31, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > > > Marcin Kulisz <deb...@kulisz.net> (02/06/2013): > > > > Why not to use http://http.debian.net/ ? > > > > > > Surely the .net part of it? > > > > If that's the reason, why do we have cdn.debian.net in the list of > > mirrors used in d-i? I'm not against either but would prefer to > > see the same standards apply to both solutions.
There's a slight difference between having one mirror among many others and having a default location… > Or, we could investigate whether one or the other could be made > official? I guess Raphael and/or DSA would be happy to receive help, possibly on the “make it production-ready” front (matching DSA's expectations, etc.). But I'm none of those so I might be entirely mistaken. :) Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
