Re: Dual licensing for KDE-Oxygen Icons

On 2013-02-14, Tom Schindl wrote: > Hi Sune, > > Thanks this is how I also always interpreted it as well, one can simply > choose. > > Oxygen was dual licensed from the beginning but the 2 option was removed > with > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/oxygen-icons/COPYING?r1=699615&r2=760422 >

Re: Dual licensing for KDE-Oxygen Icons

Hi Sune, Thanks this is how I also always interpreted it as well, one can simply choose. Oxygen was dual licensed from the beginning but the 2 option was removed with http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/oxygen-icons/COPYING?r1=699615&r2=760422 5 years ago. Tom Am 14.02.13 10:15, schrieb Sune

Re: Dual licensing for KDE-Oxygen Icons

On 2013-02-14, Tom Schindl wrote: > They dual licensed their icons in history but removed this option > there've been multiple factors to do this and I was told that Debian > was one of the reasons because you had problems with this dual licensing > option. If anyone said Debian has problems with

Dual licensing for KDE-Oxygen Icons

Hi, I'm currently trying to get the KDE-Artist Team to once more dual license their Icon-Set under LGPL and Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License. They dual licensed their icons in history but removed this option there've been multiple factors to do this and I was told that Debian wa