Hi Sune, Thanks this is how I also always interpreted it as well, one can simply choose.
Oxygen was dual licensed from the beginning but the 2 option was removed with http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/oxygen-icons/COPYING?r1=699615&r2=760422 5 years ago. Tom Am 14.02.13 10:15, schrieb Sune Vuorela: > On 2013-02-14, Tom Schindl <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> wrote: >> They dual licensed their icons in history but removed this option >> there've been multiple factors to do this and I was told that Debian >> was one of the reasons because you had problems with this dual licensing >> option. > > If anyone said Debian has problems with dual licensing, someone must > have misunderstood something or someone. > > Dual licensing usually means 'you can choose any of the two' for > complying. > > e.g. dual licensed (GPL|proprietary) is seen quite a lot. Debian just > chooses the GPL license. > > iirc back in the days, the oxygen icons was specifically *only* under > cc-by-(sa)-2.0 and given that one isn't considered free by Debian, we > got them to add lgpl as an alternative. > > /Sune > > -- B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tom schindl geschäftsführer/CEO ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1 A-6020 innsbruck fax ++43 512 935833 http://www.BestSolution.at phone ++43 512 935834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/511caeea.5060...@bestsolution.at
