Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is it time to think about removing kerberos4kth from the archive
>> anyway?
> Stanford still uses Kerberos 4. Would removing kerberos4kth be
> tantamount to dropping Kerberos 4 support? When I've tried to use
> Deb
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> There have been increasing calls for me to drop krb4
Brian> support in Heimdal (first in bug #315059 and now by
Brian> upstream in bug #334632 - it would also solve #236851). It
Brian> would also eliminate confusion such
Björn Torkelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 12:18 +1000, Brian May wrote:
>> Is it time to think about removing kerberos4kth from the archive
>> anyway?
>
> In my opinion yes. However an easy and well documented upgrade-path from
> a krb4 KDC to a krb5 KDC is probably nece
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 12:18 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Steve> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman
> Steve> wrote:
> >> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you
> >> turn off krb4?
>
> "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> Stanford still uses Kerberos 4. Would removing kerberos4kth
Ben> be tantamount to dropping Kerberos 4 support? When I've
Ben> tried to use Debian's other implementations of Kerberos in
Ben> the past at Stanford, I've had n
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it time to think about removing kerberos4kth from the archive
> anyway?
Stanford still uses Kerberos 4. Would removing kerberos4kth be
tantamount to dropping Kerberos 4 support? When I've tried to
use Debian's other implementations of Kerberos in the p
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> Do heimdal's krb4 support libraries actually implement the
Steve> same ABI as the kerberos4kth implementation? Depending on
Steve> the details, it might be better to
Steve> Provides/Conflicts/Replaces the old krb4
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 12:18:27PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman
> Steve> wrote:
> >> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you
> >> turn off krb
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman
Steve> wrote:
>> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you
>> turn off krb4?
Steve> According to upstream, krb524 works without krb4 in he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you turn off
> krb4?
According to upstream, krb524 works without krb4 in heimdal 0.7; nothing was
said about heimdal 0.6.3 which we
Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you turn off
krb4?
If so, that will be a problem for current openafs, although probably
not for future openafs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-devel, bug#315059 and submitter
CC: krb4 maintainer and openafs maintainers
Hello,
There have been increasing calls for me to drop krb4 support in
Heimdal (first in bug #315059 and now by upstream in bug #334632 - it
would also solve #236851). It would also eliminate confusion such as
12 matches
Mail list logo
