Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is it time to think about removing kerberos4kth from the archive >> anyway? > Stanford still uses Kerberos 4. Would removing kerberos4kth be > tantamount to dropping Kerberos 4 support? When I've tried to use > Debian's other implementations of Kerberos in the past at Stanford, I've > had no luck at all. We have another implementation available locally at Stanford for Debian users here and I can point Ben at that. We're starting our project to retire K4 at Stanford the beginning of next year, so please don't maintain K4 support in Debian on our account. We have a handful of local packages that do the bits that are necessary for us and that we'll drop as soon as we finish our migration. Note that I don't speak for SLAC, but I think they're mostly using Red Hat. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
