On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> On mar, 2008-04-01 at 01:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:57:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > I also have to wonder that if we have something like this as default,
> > > why -Bsymbolic-functions wo
On mar, 2008-04-01 at 01:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:57:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I also have to wonder that if we have something like this as default,
> > why -Bsymbolic-functions would be a good default, and not -Bsymbolic.
>
> I'm told the difference is
On lun, 2008-03-31 at 22:46 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Note also that I'm not sure at all that either -Bsymbolic-functions or
> -Bsymbolic is a good idea.
It is a very good idea for pluggable modules that are meant to be
dlopen()ed, because it avoids their symbols to be overriden by
completely un
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:57:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:34:05PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > (moving to debian-devel as requested by Kurt)
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > However, as Thiemo notes, this does break the expectation that LD_PRE
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 16:21:14 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I also have to wonder that if we have something like this as default,
> > why -Bsymbolic-functions would be a good default, and not -Bsymbolic.
>
> It's also worth noting that the origi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:23:59PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> LD_PRELOAD would still be able to override it, because by default, ELF
> shared libraries use relocations that must be serviced by ld.so.
That part is incorrect. A hidden symbol binds at link time; ld.so
is never given the c
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:23:59PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:51:00PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>>> According to ld(1):
>>>
>>> -Bsymbolic-functions
>>> When creating a shared library, bind references to global function
>>> symbols to the definition w
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:51:00PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
According to ld(1):
-Bsymbolic-functions
When creating a shared library, bind references to global function
symbols to the definition within the shared library, if any.
This option is only meaningful on ELF platforms which
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 08:09:04PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:57:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:34:05PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
>>> I just wondered: is it possible to reverse/disable the effects of
>>> -Bsymbolic-functions if LD_PRE
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:21:14PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I also have to wonder that if we have something like this as default,
> > why -Bsymbolic-functions would be a good default, and not -Bsymbolic.
>
> It's also worth noting that the origin
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I also have to wonder that if we have something like this as default,
> why -Bsymbolic-functions would be a good default, and not -Bsymbolic.
It's also worth noting that the original proposal (
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00090.html )
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:57:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:34:05PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
I just wondered: is it possible to reverse/disable the effects of
-Bsymbolic-functions if LD_PRELOAD is set? Or is it too late already
and some information was definitely
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:34:05PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> (moving to debian-devel as requested by Kurt)
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > However, as Thiemo notes, this does break the expectation that LD_PRELOAD
> > will be allowed to intercept symbols; so this is definitel
(moving to debian-devel as requested by Kurt)
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> However, as Thiemo notes, this does break the expectation that LD_PRELOAD
> will be allowed to intercept symbols; so this is definitely a behavior
> change with some possibly subtle consequences.
I just
14 matches
Mail list logo
