On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:57:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:34:05PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > > (moving to debian-devel as requested by Kurt)
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > However, as Thiemo notes, this does break the expectation that LD_PRELOAD > > > will be allowed to intercept symbols; so this is definitely a behavior > > > change with some possibly subtle consequences. > > I just wondered: is it possible to reverse/disable the effects of > > -Bsymbolic-functions if LD_PRELOAD is set? Or is it too late already > > and some information was definitely lost? > If it does the same thing as -Bsymbolic, but only for functions, it > resolved all the relocations already and can only call functions > internally in the library. > I also have to wonder that if we have something like this as default, > why -Bsymbolic-functions would be a good default, and not -Bsymbolic. I'm told the difference is that the former is safe to use as an option when linking executables, and the latter is not. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
