[please don't top-post]
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 02:31:16PM +0700, Muhammad H Hilman wrote:
> Wow, it's work
>
> but, must I change the code on my application that needed filelock?
> because, filelock code on that application stated as ubuntu command (just
> filelock)
> as far as I know debian com
Wow, it's work
but, must I change the code on my application that needed filelock?
because, filelock code on that application stated as ubuntu command (just
filelock)
as far as I know debian command on filelock is (filelock-create)
can you tel me what's the different between (filelock-create) com
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:16:02PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> maybe
> apt-get install liblockfile1
Possibly, but lockf() and fcntl() are usually better, and are present
in libc.
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `'
Hello,
maybe
apt-get install liblockfile1
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Lin
[Please note that this question is more appropriate for debian-user, not
debian-devel.]
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:51:39AM +0700, Muhammad H Hilman wrote:
> Dear Debian developers
> I run DOVIS 2.0 (docking application) in cluster server using Debian Sarge
> Then I got *"Can not
Dear Debian developers
I run DOVIS 2.0 (docking application) in cluster server using Debian Sarge
Then I got *"Can not get init lock!"* notification
here is the screenshoot
[image: http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/7643/35869453.png]
I already asked the developers about this problem
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:48:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #273413,
regarding Debian 'sarge' - apt-get destroyed hard disks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 07:24 am, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham wrote:
> Hi. I am trying to install the development files for motif but i get this:
>
> porter:~# apt-get install libmotif-dev
What do you get if you chase dependencies by hand by running:
apt-get install libmotif-dev xlibs-dev
Da
endency Tree... Done
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> []
>
> Works no problem. And for completeness my sources.list:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ sarge main
> deb-src h
Andrew Vaughan schrieb am Donnerstag, den 28. Juli 2005:
[...]
> libmotif-dev is in non-free.
So what:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get install libmotif-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed
ackage, installing lesstif instead]
> Works no problem. And for completeness my sources.list:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ sarge main
> deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ sarge main
>deb
IL PROTECTED]:/# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ sarge main
> deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ sarge main
> deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main
libmotif-dev is in non-free.
>
> So you should really check your sources list
ollowing extra packages will be installed:
[]
Works no problem. And for completeness my sources.list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ sarge main
deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ sarge main
[fixed top-posting in quote]
Frederico Rodrigues Abraham wrote:
> On 7/27/05, Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Frederico Rodrigues Abraham schrieb am Dienstag, den 26. Juli 2005:
>>
>> > Hi. I am trying to install the development files for motif but i get this:
>> [..]
>>
>> Welcome
i am using debian stable... (sarge)
i sent this mail to debiandevel ... should i have done it? is this the
place for bug reports on debian stable?
thanks
-- Fred
On 7/27/05, Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frederico Rodrigues Abraham schrieb am Dienstag, den 26. Juli 2005:
>
> > Hi. I
Frederico Rodrigues Abraham schrieb am Dienstag, den 26. Juli 2005:
> Hi. I am trying to install the development files for motif but i get this:
[..]
Welcome to unstable and the c++ and x.org transition. You have to wait until
the transiton is finished or fix the correspondent packages on your ow
I had the same happen when trying to install the nvidia development packages:
porter:~# apt-get install nvidia-glx-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are us
Hi. I am trying to install the development files for motif but i get this:
porter:~# apt-get install libmotif-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using t
Magik wrote:
> > I think the typical answer will be to compile in a woody chroot.
> > There are several different packages to help such as pbuilder and
> > dchroot. This works quite well for C programs because gcc is very
> > mature and the woody default gcc compiler is sufficient for most
> > tas
> A side comment. Not having heard of omni-bot I went to that web site
> and looked for something that would tell me about it. I may be blind
> but after looking I still don't know what it is.
It's an AI framework for variuos games/mods. Currently mainly supporting the
Enemy Territory engine but
ted our stuff to Linux and everything works fine so
> far. We're using Debian Sarge to compile our stuff.
Sounds good. Except for your problem.
> Here comes the problem:
> It seems there are still a lot of users out there running glibc-2.2 based
> systems.
It is interesting t
Hi.
I'm one of the developers of Omni-bot (www.omni-bot.com). We recently ported
our stuff to Linux and everything works fine so far. We're using Debian
Sarge to compile our stuff.
Here comes the problem:
It seems there are still a lot of users out there running glibc-2.2 based
systems
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 08:59:16AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Hello,
> I am attempting to upgrade a powerpc based system to sarge. It was
> previously on testing, but hasn't been updated for months.
> Then again, maybe the entire archive *is* corrupt!
> Failed to fetch
> http://mirror.pacific.ne
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-cache show libc6 | grep MD5sum MD5sum:
Brian> ab0895ee6d8d2cf3b6906eb5228e5c25
Brian> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# md5sum
Brian> /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_powerpc.deb
Brian> 6930111
Hello,
I am attempting to upgrade a powerpc based system to sarge. It was
previously on testing, but hasn't been updated for months.
I left the download going overnight (over 600Meg downloads according
to aptitude), but it doesn't seem to like anything it downloads. No
errors, no warnings, but no
"Eddy Veenstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear Debian team,
...
> The installation asked for my video-card (Nvidia GeForce 5700LE)and
> my monitor ( CTX S962 19'' LCD ). I selected the correct driver (NV)
> and gave the horizontal and vertical frequencies ( 30-80 hor, 59-75
> vert ) for my m
e proper drivers
> installed, except for my wireless network card (RT2500) which had to be done
> manually. Even my TV-card was recognized and installed.
>
> What I don't like about Mandrake and Suze is that they decide which packages
> are to be installed; they do a lot behind m
which had to be done manually. Even
my TV-card was recognized and installed.
What I
don't like about Mandrake and Suze is that they decide which packages are to be
installed; they do a lot behind my back and that's what I don't
like.
Now I've
downloaded Debian Sarge DVD
We should pay attention.
the sarge is very expected release and it's late has already generated
enough noise about the debian release management.
i think we should just release sarge and try to reduce the noise around sarge.
2005/5/13, Alien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> hello.
>
> Considering
hello.
Considering the most important emprovements
introduced in Sarge respect Woody, I suggest you to call the prox stable release
Sarge 4.0.
Best regards.
Alien
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:02:32AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Kevin Mark]
> > that would suggest that its the RM who has decided such issues in the
> > past unilaterilly.
>
> Conventional wisdom is that release management involves so much
> drudgery and so little recognition that the *lea
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:02:32AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Kevin Mark]
> > that would suggest that its the RM who has decided such issues in the
> > past unilaterilly.
> Conventional wisdom is that release management involves so much
> drudgery and so little recognition that the *least*
[Kevin Mark]
> that would suggest that its the RM who has decided such issues in the
> past unilaterilly.
Conventional wisdom is that release management involves so much
drudgery and so little recognition that the *least* we can do is let
the release manager decide on codenames and version number
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:10:41AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Andrea Mennucc]
> > me, I do my part of the work in Debian
> >
> > and nobody ever contacted me regarding the choice of the number
>
> What that...? Why on earth would you think you should be contacted
> before this sort of d
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FWIW, I've noticed that "3.1" is already used in quite a lot of
> documentation and on websites with articles relating to Debian. It
> was announced quite some time ago, and so it would be rather
> inconsiderate [gross understatement] to change it at this
* Jaldhar H. Vyas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050506 20:00]:
> On Fri, 6 May 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Their fault for releasing a book about unreleased software which is
> > bound to be outdated the day that sarge will actually release.
> Uh-uh and when will that day be? And don't give me any of t
[Andrea Mennucc]
> me, I do my part of the work in Debian
>
> and nobody ever contacted me regarding the choice of the number
What that...? Why on earth would you think you should be contacted
before this sort of decision is made?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Marc Haber wrote:
> The actual decisions are made in the background without even trying to
> talk to the body of developers. For example, the exim 4 maintainers
> were not even contacted by whoever made the decision to move the
> "default MTA" property from exim to exim4. We just found our package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 May 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Their fault for releasing a book about unreleased software which is
>>>bound to be outdated the day that sarge will actually releas
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
>
>
>>Their fault for releasing a book about unreleased software which is
>>bound to be outdated the day that sarge will actually release.
>
>
> Uh-uh and when will that day be? And don't give me any of that "when it
> is ready"
On Fri, 6 May 2005 13:54:29 -0400 (EDT), "Jaldhar H. Vyas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The problem isn't a concern for quality, it is people like you and Andrea
>who don't follow process, who don't contribute when the actual decisions
>are being made, but who come out of the woodwork at the last mi
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
> Their fault for releasing a book about unreleased software which is
> bound to be outdated the day that sarge will actually release.
Uh-uh and when will that day be? And don't give me any of that "when it
is ready" nonsense. The release version number was
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:15:13AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2005 10:30:36 -0400 (EDT), "Jaldhar H. Vyas"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, 5 May 2005, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> >> I dont see it as a big stopper. You are saying that the number "3.1"
> >> appears /etc/debian_versi
On Thu, 5 May 2005 10:30:36 -0400 (EDT), "Jaldhar H. Vyas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 5 May 2005, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
>> I dont see it as a big stopper. You are saying that the number "3.1"
>> appears /etc/debian_version (that lives in package "base-files")
>> and in 3 documents (and tra
hi I see that some people are opposing using "4.0", so I give up.
I just write this e-mail to better understand why
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:17:45AM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
>
>>So I would much prefer if sarge would be called "Debian 4"
>>
>>Do you agree?
>
Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> > see shy jo, who argued for 4.0 at the appropriate time to discuss the
> >version number to use
>
> That is puzzling me. In 2003, in the thread starting at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/01/msg00337.html
> most people were agreeing with calling sar
Joey Hess wrote:
> Now that sarge is frozen we have /etc/debian_version, the installation
> manual, the release notes, and the website all containing the version
> number 3.1. I've probably forgotten a few other things. Updating all
> these things to change a version number kinda misses the point o
On Thursday 05 May 2005 10:38 am, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Release numbers, like release code names, are up to the release managers
> to decide. Since neither is particularly important, there's really not
> much point in discussing them at length: if the release managers want
> 3.1, then 3.1 is what
to, 2005-05-05 kello 15:52 +0200, Andrea Mennucc kirjoitti:
> So why nobody did actually change the number then?
Release numbers, like release code names, are up to the release managers
to decide. Since neither is particularly important, there's really not
much point in discussing them at length:
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> I dont see it as a big stopper. You are saying that the number "3.1"
> appears /etc/debian_version (that lives in package "base-files")
> and in 3 documents (and translations).
...and Debian 3.1 Bible whose publisher will be highly annoyed if they are
f
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> I would bet 10$ that during the freeze more than 300 packages will be
> admitted into Sarge.
> And I would bet another 5$ that "base-files" will be one of them.
even considering that base-files has been frozen for, what, half a yea
Joey Hess wrote:
> Andrea Mennucc wrote:
>
>>now that sarge is frozen, I would like to start a discussion
>>on the number to associate to Sarge release.
>
> Now that sarge is frozen we have /etc/debian_version, the installation
> manual, the release notes, and the website all containing the versi
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > * Several new architectures
>
> Such as?
>
negative sparc
negative alpha
negative mips
negative mipsel
...
in fact we addded -8 architectures altogether.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
> "Wouter" == Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * Several new architectures
> Such as?
Sorry, my mistake. I forgot that woody was released on 11 architectures.
Ganesan
--
Ganesan Rajagopal (rganesan at debian.org) | GPG Key: 1024D/5D8C12EA
Web: http://employees.org/~rganesan
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:12:12PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> > "Bartosz" == Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would prefer to be maintainer of the well known distribution which
> > *doesn't* bump versions only for the fun of it.
>
> Exactly. This time I thin
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > I would prefer to be maintainer of the well known distribution which
> > *doesn't* bump versions only for the fun of it.
> >
> > I know that for most people numbers have some magic meaning, but please can
> > we try to provide stable
> "Bartosz" == Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would prefer to be maintainer of the well known distribution which
> *doesn't* bump versions only for the fun of it.
Exactly. This time I think it would have been justified. Consider
* A new installer
* Linux Kernel 2.6
Hello Bartosz,
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-05 11:40]:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:17:45AM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> > Considering that woody was released 19 Jul 2002, it took us
> > ~3 years to release; in the meantime, all most important
> > components changed co
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:17:45AM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> Considering that woody was released 19 Jul 2002, it took us
> ~3 years to release; in the meantime, all most important
> components changed completely; and we did a lot of work
> in Sarge, that I do not want to see numerically
> repr
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 08:38:17PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> see shy jo, who argued for 4.0 at the appropriate time to discuss the
> version number to use
:-) right
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> now that sarge is frozen, I would like to start a discussion
> on the number to associate to Sarge release.
Now that sarge is frozen we have /etc/debian_version, the installation
manual, the release notes, and the website all containing the version
number 3.1. I've probably
On Thursday 05 May 2005 01:17, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
[ ... ]
> Considering that woody was released 19 Jul 2002, it took us
> ~3 years to release; in the meantime, all most important
> components changed completely; and we did a lot of work
> in Sarge, that I do not want to see numerically
> represe
hi everybody
now that sarge is frozen, I would like to start a discussion
on the number to associate to Sarge release.
According to
http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/sarge/index.en.html
Sarge may be released as "Debian 3.1"
In 2003, Scott James Remnant proposed in
http://lists.debian.org/debian
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are offering free accounts on a Debian "sarge" server, including
> ssh, vnc/X11, web, email, rsync, svn, darcs, ultra-fast internet access
> and many more services to come - basically w
Hi, Debian people,
We are offering free accounts on a Debian "sarge" server, including
ssh, vnc/X11, web, email, rsync, svn, darcs, ultra-fast internet access
and many more services to come - basically we're happy to set up
whatever services you might want. We also offer s
Hello,
Please verify mod aic7xxx SCSI
Host Adapter, i find problem install Debian Sarge...
Debian sarge ---> Failed
Debian Woody ---> Sucess ( Drivers Red Hat this
OK )
I sorry my english
Daniel - Brasil
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:47:18PM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Can you folks at Debian tell me whether we are supported in Sarge?
The stock kernels support Reiser3, but not Reiser4. Reiser4 support
packages are available, however.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
so
As far as I can see - Debian "Sarge" / Debian "testing" / Debian
GNU/Linux 3.1 - now has support both for Reiserfs [?? 3.6.19??]
and Reiser4 [?? 1.0.3 ??]. There is a kernel patch against version
2.6.8 for Reiser4.
Hope this helps - everyone feel free to correct me if I'
Le lundi 28 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 13:47 -0800, Hans Reiser a Ãcrit :
> Can you folks at Debian tell me whether we are supported in Sarge?
As far as I know, there is no reiser4 support in the Debian stock
kernel.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'
6 not 4.
Things could have changed of course, but I don't really expect so.
Hope this helps
Floris
> Ben Pont wrote:
>
> >I am preparing to install Debian "Sarge" on my
> >computer and am debating whether to partition
> >Reiser4 or Ext3.
> >
> >I
Can you folks at Debian tell me whether we are supported in Sarge?
Thanks,
Hans
Ben Pont wrote:
I am preparing to install Debian "Sarge" on my
computer and am debating whether to partition
Reiser4 or Ext3.
I know Lindows supports Reiser4, Lindows being
Debian based, but do you kno
[Joey Hess]
> Probably making the print server task install it instead of lpr, which
> would have a side effect of making sure it's on CD#1 if it's not
> already. Probably also demoting the lpr package to optional and moving
> cups from there to standard. Possibly making lsb depend on part of cups
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 01:44, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:51:53AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > For the vast majority of situations, it's incredibly easier to configure,
> > and usually more reliable about output, than lprng.
>
> Implying that there are circumstances where CUP
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:51:53AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> For the vast majority of situations, it's incredibly easier to configure,
> and usually more reliable about output, than lprng.
Implying that there are circumstances where CUPS will produce valid output,
and lprng will not? I'm inte
* Joe Wreschnig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030802 10:05]:
> CUPS is configurable via ordinary text configuration files like most
> Unix programs, a web interface (which is what I use), GNOME or KDE
> frontends, probably a number of miscelleaneous toolkit frontends, too...
>
> Personally, I'm surprised t
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 23:31, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:52:04PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > However, I am biased, as I package the GNOME CUPS packages... :)
>
> And as a random comment, it's really sad that a printing system would have
> any sort of dependency whatsoever on
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:52:04PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> As a random reply...
> However, I am biased, as I package the GNOME CUPS packages... :)
And as a random comment, it's really sad that a printing system would have
any sort of dependency whatsoever on Gnome (or KDE, for that matter).
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:44:17AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> The last time I tried to use CUPS, I found it to be so user friendly
> that I couldn't get it to do anything useful. Very pretty, less
> functional; and the documentation was entirely inadequate.
>
> On the other hand, whi
Keegan Quinn wrote:
> FWIW, I've had very good experiences with the CUPS in unstable, so
> I'd not object to this. OTOH, installing it without it being 'default'
> is already quite trivial. What would this change entail, exactly?
Probably making the print server task install it instead of lpr, w
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:49:59PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Do we actually need a default print service at all? Mail is much more
> fundamental, for example, but lots of computers these days don't have a
> printer attached at all.
We needn't install a print service by default but if someone
On pe, 2003-08-01 at 12:32, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> It is a good solution for any user level with most common printers/needs,
> thus it
> should be the default (IMHO).
Do we actually need a default print service at all? Mail is much more
fundamental, for example, but lots of compu
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:35:13AM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> FWIW, I've had very good experiences with the CUPS in unstable, so
> I'd not object to this. OTOH, installing it without it being 'default'
> is already quite trivial. What would this change entail, exactly?
So i had/have either in
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So am I. To bad it isn't lpr compatible at all (at least not
> lprng-lpr).
Well, lprng isn't lpr... but if there are clienty things you want,
you could probably use lprng's clients with CUPS's lpr server.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - I am the
Hi Cyrille!
You wrote:
> I'm mostly using its lpr-compatible command-line interface.
So am I. To bad it isn't lpr compatible at all (at least not
lprng-lpr).
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:38:55PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I believe it would be a good idea if the default print system in the
> next release of Debian (Sarge) is changed to CUPS. CUPS is a more
> complete, more userfriendly and RFC complient printing system.
FWIW, I&#x
Le Thu, Jul 31, 2003, à 03:09:15PM +0100, Ross Burton a écrit:
> On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 15:00, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> > if only gnome-cups-manager wasn't leaking memory like a CPU leaks
> > heat...)
>
> Terribly sorry about this. It's only gnome-cups-icon which leaks like
> mad, so you can kill
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 15:00, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> if only gnome-cups-manager wasn't leaking memory like a CPU leaks
> heat...)
Terribly sorry about this. It's only gnome-cups-icon which leaks like
mad, so you can kill that and use eggcups instead (looks almost
identical).
I'll be removing e
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:52:04PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 14:44, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > The last time I tried to use CUPS, I found it to be so user friendly
> > that I couldn't get it to do anything useful. Very pretty, less
> > functional; and the documentation wa
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:38:55PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >
> > I believe it would be a good idea if the default print system in the
> > next release of Debian (Sarge) is changed to CUPS. CUPS is a more
> > complete, more userfriendly and RF
Le Thu, Jul 31, 2003, à 09:44:17AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit:
> The last time I tried to use CUPS, I found it to be so user friendly
> that I couldn't get it to do anything useful. Very pretty, less
> functional; and the documentation was entirely inadequate.
Well, while what you describe
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 14:44, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> The last time I tried to use CUPS, I found it to be so user friendly
> that I couldn't get it to do anything useful. Very pretty, less
> functional; and the documentation was entirely inadequate.
>
> On the other hand, while lprng was anythi
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:38:55PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> I believe it would be a good idea if the default print system in the
> next release of Debian (Sarge) is changed to CUPS. CUPS is a more
> complete, more userfriendly and RFC complient printing system.
I believe it would be a good idea if the default print system in the
next release of Debian (Sarge) is changed to CUPS. CUPS is a more
complete, more userfriendly and RFC complient printing system.
http://www.cups.org>
Any reason not to change the default?
93 matches
Mail list logo
