On Thursday 05 May 2005 10:38 am, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Release numbers, like release code names, are up to the release managers
> to decide. Since neither is particularly important, there's really not
> much point in discussing them at length: if the release managers want
> 3.1, then 3.1 is what we get.

  At least not in the common case.  I imagine there would be some 
consternation if the release team announced we were entering the freeze for 
Debian 2.9 codename "sarge". ;-)

  Daniel

-- 
/------------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------\
|         "Of course you can't see the guards.  They DON'T EXIST!"          |
|         "Oh my god, we're surrounded!" "Run away, run away!"              |
|          -- Fluble                                                        |
\------ Listener-supported public radio -- NPR -- http://www.npr.org -------/

Attachment: pgpGQcEt7kdEb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to