On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:32:21 +0200
Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 23/09/2010 01:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Jérémy Lal writes ("Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable
> > name (exclusive alternatives ?)"):
> >> On might object "node" would have a diffe
On 23/09/2010 01:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jérémy Lal writes ("Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name
> (exclusive alternatives ?)"):
>> On might object "node" would have a different meaning, depending
>> on the packages installed ; still, nodejs
Jérémy Lal writes ("Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name
(exclusive alternatives ?)"):
> On might object "node" would have a different meaning, depending
> on the packages installed ; still, nodejs or x25node (if its maintainer
> cares to follow) would
On 21/09/2010 18:01, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>>
>> Did you say that before? I don't think so. Personally, I care about the
>> Debian package only because the original bugreport (from where this
>> discussion started) was against the D
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> Did you say that before? I don't think so. Personally, I care about the
> Debian package only because the original bugreport (from where this
> discussion started) was against the Debian package and for a Debian
> specificity, not a
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:07:39PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> On 21/09/2010 16:02, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:54:41PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >>
> >> Wrong. nodejs still provides the binary nodejs and not _node_. So,
> >> nodejs can stay as is. The rename wo
On 21/09/2010 17:22, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
>
> You are quick with the "wrong" button.
It's my new toy :)
> The UPSTREAM nodejs is /usr/bin/node. The Debian package renamed it to
> nodejs.
>
Did you say that before? I don't think so. Personally, I care about the
Debian package only because
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:54:41PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> Wrong. nodejs still provides the binary nodejs and not _node_. So, nodejs can
> stay as is. The rename would be necessary if both packages provide the
> same binary (same filename), which is not the case here.
>
Actually, from the
On 21/09/2010 16:02, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:54:41PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>>
>> Wrong. nodejs still provides the binary nodejs and not _node_. So,
>> nodejs can stay as is. The rename would be necessary if both
>> packages provide the same binary (same filename
Note that i tried to warn upstream nodejs several months ago, but it was
already too late, so i renamed it to comply.
Please also note that nodejs runs (js) scripts, so the renaming means
each nodejs module[0] that may be packaged in the future,
and that provides executables, will need to be patch
Mehdi Dogguy writes ("Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name"):
> Wrong. nodejs still provides the binary nodejs and not _node_. So, nodejs can
> stay as is. The rename would be necessary if both packages provide the
> same binary (same filename), which is not th
On 21/09/2010 14:48, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Carl Fürstenberg writes ("Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable
> name"):
>> Policy only states "The maintainers should report this to the
>> debian-devel mailing list and try to find a consensus about which
>&
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:48:03PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Carl Fürstenberg writes ("Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable
> name"):
> > Policy only states "The maintainers should report this to the
> > debian-devel mailing list and try to find
Carl Fürstenberg writes ("Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name"):
> Policy only states "The maintainers should report this to the
> debian-devel mailing list and try to find a consensus about which
> program will have to be renamed. If a consensus cannot be
On 21/09/2010 02:00, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> 2010/9/21 Jérémy Lal :
I also contacted debian-hams to see if they'd mind changing this binary
name,
and the answer is clearly no [1].
[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hams/2010/08/msg00031.html
i posted a reply yesterday
2010/9/21 Jérémy Lal :
> On 21/09/2010 01:31, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 00:46, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> On 21/09/2010 00:27, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
Package: nodejs
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: normal
in debian, the executable name is set to "nodejs"; t
16 matches
Mail list logo
