On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:54:41PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > Wrong. nodejs still provides the binary nodejs and not _node_. So, nodejs can > stay as is. The rename would be necessary if both packages provide the > same binary (same filename), which is not the case here. >
Actually, from the discussion in debian-hams, nodejs provides a binary named "node" - otherwise we would not need to have the discussion at all since there would be no conflict. -- Patrick Ouellette p...@flying-gecko.net ne4po (at) arrl (dot) net Amateur Radio: NE4PO What kind of change have you been in the world today? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100921140225.gb26...@flying-gecko.net
