Re: Bug#315059: Drop KRB4 support from HEIMDAL

2005-10-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Is it time to think about removing kerberos4kth from the archive >> anyway? > Stanford still uses Kerberos 4. Would removing kerberos4kth be > tantamount to dropping Kerberos 4 support? When I've tried to use > Deb

Re: Bug#315059: Drop KRB4 support from HEIMDAL

2005-10-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
Björn Torkelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 12:18 +1000, Brian May wrote: >> Is it time to think about removing kerberos4kth from the archive >> anyway? > > In my opinion yes. However an easy and well documented upgrade-path from > a krb4 KDC to a krb5 KDC is probably nece

Re: Bug#315059: Drop KRB4 support from HEIMDAL

2005-10-25 Thread Björn Torkelsson
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 12:18 +1000, Brian May wrote: > > "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Steve> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman > Steve> wrote: > >> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you > >> turn off krb4? >

Re: Bug#315059: Drop KRB4 support from HEIMDAL

2005-10-24 Thread Brian May
> "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben> Stanford still uses Kerberos 4. Would removing kerberos4kth Ben> be tantamount to dropping Kerberos 4 support? When I've Ben> tried to use Debian's other implementations of Kerberos in Ben> the past at Stanford, I've had n

Re: Bug#315059: Drop KRB4 support from HEIMDAL

2005-10-24 Thread Ben Pfaff
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it time to think about removing kerberos4kth from the archive > anyway? Stanford still uses Kerberos 4. Would removing kerberos4kth be tantamount to dropping Kerberos 4 support? When I've tried to use Debian's other implementations of Kerberos in the p

Re: Bug#315059: Drop KRB4 support from HEIMDAL

2005-10-23 Thread Brian May
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> Do heimdal's krb4 support libraries actually implement the Steve> same ABI as the kerberos4kth implementation? Depending on Steve> the details, it might be better to Steve> Provides/Conflicts/Replaces the old krb4

Re: Bug#315059: Drop KRB4 support from HEIMDAL

2005-10-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 12:18:27PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > > "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Steve> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman > Steve> wrote: > >> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you > >> turn off krb

Re: Bug#315059: Drop KRB4 support from HEIMDAL

2005-10-23 Thread Brian May
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman Steve> wrote: >> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you >> turn off krb4? Steve> According to upstream, krb524 works without krb4 in he