* Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030601 13:59]:
> On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 09:01:37PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > MGT is much more capable than gnome-terminal, I prefer the power of MGT
> > over gnome-terminal, and if no-one else will step in, I'd be willing to
> > maintain MGT myself.
>
>
On May 30, Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there anything that multi-gnome-terminal can do that the current
>(GNOME 2) gnome-terminal cannot? Is there any point in keeping this
Yes, gnome-terminal forces me to have a useless (I always use the
keyboard to switch tab) tabs bar.
--
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 09:01:37PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> MGT is much more capable than gnome-terminal, I prefer the power of MGT
> over gnome-terminal, and if no-one else will step in, I'd be willing to
> maintain MGT myself.
I think I can't find enough time... and I'd like to see it maintai
On May 30, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm quite happy to believe that, but would you like to list some of the
>capabilities it has that gnome-terminal doesn't so at to let the rest of
>us understand as well?
It allows to hide the tabs. This is a requirement for me, as I cannot
a
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 03:34:50AM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 May 2003 17:25:15 +0200,
> > "SR" == Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SR> Is there anything that multi-gnome-terminal can do that the current
> SR> (GNOME 2) gnome-terminal cannot? Is there any point i
* Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030530 22:57]:
> On pe, 2003-05-30 at 21:01, Baruch Even wrote:
> > MGT is much more capable than gnome-terminal,
>
> I'm quite happy to believe that, but would you like to list some of the
> capabilities it has that gnome-terminal doesn't so at to let the res
On pe, 2003-05-30 at 21:01, Baruch Even wrote:
> MGT is much more capable than gnome-terminal,
I'm quite happy to believe that, but would you like to list some of the
capabilities it has that gnome-terminal doesn't so at to let the rest of
us understand as well?
(The list provided in a couple of
> On Fri, 30 May 2003 17:25:15 +0200,
> "SR" == Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SR> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 12:00:13AM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
>> I'm orphaning multi-gnome-terminal package now, because I
>> don't use it at this point, and I have no enough time to
>> maintain
MGT is much more capable than gnome-terminal, I prefer the power of MGT
over gnome-terminal, and if no-one else will step in, I'd be willing to
maintain MGT myself.
I wouldn't think that any GNOME 1 program is obsolete. In this case MGT
provides useful functionality and the fact that it's based on
> ==
> Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 17:25:15 +0200
> From: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#195426: O: multi-gnome-terminal -- Enhanced
> the GNOME Terminal
> ==
>
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 12:00:13AM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> I'm orphaning multi-gnome-terminal package now, because I
> don't use it at this point, and I have no enough time to
> maintain such package. presumably there might be the
> appropriate DD than me to maintain this package.
Is there an
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm orphaning multi-gnome-terminal package now, because I
don't use it at this point, and I have no enough time to
maintain such package. presumably there might be the
appropriate DD than me to maintain this package.
Description is here:
Multi Gnome Terminal is an
12 matches
Mail list logo
