On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:54:23 +0300, Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 09:00:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> In the last case, there should be a way to do this _easily_. Currently
>> the only way to do this is parsing dpkg --list output, which is mucho
>> ugly.
>
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 09:00:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> In the last case, there should be a way to do this _easily_. Currently
> the only way to do this is parsing dpkg --list output, which is mucho
> ugly.
I'd actually prefer the file check, and not involve the packaging system
in the day-t
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 01:13:50 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It is also a damn hole in Debian policy. That one I will propose a fix
>to: scripts that are conffiles MUST test if the package is in the installed
>state, and that test MUST either be done by checking for
On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Ernst Kloppenburg wrote:
> yes. So maybe one of the packages should have its amavisd renamed.
I have no problem with that (heck, it is a daemon). But this does not
solve the entire Debian-wide problem that the amavis-* packages hit.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003, Brian May wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 08:51:51PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> > Share an initscript between them, if that's possible?
>
> No, that would cause more problems trying to rename
> the existing amavisd-new conffile.
Agreed. This is not something we should b
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 08:51:51PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> Share an initscript between them, if that's possible?
No, that would cause more problems trying to rename
the existing amavisd-new conffile.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 09:06:58AM +0200, Ernst Kloppenburg wrote:
> yes. So maybe one of
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 10:22:45 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 09:33:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Package: amavisd-new
> > Version: 20021227p2-5
> > Severity: grave
>
> Grave would seem to be a bit of an overkill? amavisd-new still works OK
> for the majority of use
On Sat Apr 19, 10:22am +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Any ideas?
Share an initscript between them, if that's possible?
pgp2vmAEIdmO0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 09:33:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: amavisd-new
> Version: 20021227p2-5
> Severity: grave
Grave would seem to be a bit of an overkill? amavisd-new still works OK
for the majority of users...
> when
>- amavis-ng is installed (I used version 0.1.6.2-1)
9 matches
Mail list logo
