Noah Meyerhans (2024-12-19):
> I'm not sure it's the case that most of those other systems install
> Priority: standard. Debootstrap certainly doesn't by itself, and I
> don't think the debuerreotype tool for building OCI images does either.
> In any case, your point still stands. I'll re-assign
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024, 09:15 Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 general
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 04:24:49PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Regarding tasksel vs. Priority, the latter has a potential for a much
> > wider impact: lots of Debian system are installed without d-i and/or
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 04:28:52PM -0500, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:53:27PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > > > > In theory, if we don't want to explicitly install the package in d-i,
> > > > > another possibility might be to bump it to Priority: standard and let
> > >
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:53:27PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > > > In theory, if we don't want to explicitly install the package in d-i,
> > > > another possibility might be to bump it to Priority: standard and let
> > > > tasksel install it. I'm not sure what the tradeoffs might be that
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 12:12:13PM -0500, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
[..]
> > > In theory, if we don't want to explicitly install the package in d-i,
> > > another possibility might be to bump it to Priority: standard and let
> > > tasksel install it. I'm not sure what the tradeoffs might be that would
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 general
Bug #1090811 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: install
linux-sysctl-defaults by default
Bug reassigned from package 'src:debian-installer' to 'general'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer/20240914.
Ignoring request to a
6 matches
Mail list logo
