Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:21:55PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > > No, it is based on the assumption that a buildd will only install > > things listed in the Build-Depends, which means it will catch > > stuff that only builds on the maintainers workstation b

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-22 Thread Chris Cheney
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:21:55PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > No, it is based on the assumption that a buildd will only install things > listed in the Build-Depends, which means it will catch stuff that only > builds on the maintainers workstation because they aren't building > inside a chroot and

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > > > > > The only problem with that is the current failure to comply to policy, > >

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-21 Thread Brian May
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:20:42PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > As for the problem with the source file containing non-free code, > if you have prestine source code, this is something that > really needs to get fixed upstream :-(, eg. split into two > files. Looking at the other messages in the thr

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-21 Thread Brian May
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:04:40AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > Ok. Lets leave aside for a moment the .debs which would go into contrib > or non-free so would have to be built seperately. What happens if > webmin-squid has an RC bug? As Goswin said, all the webmin-* packages > will be held ba

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-20 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > > > The only problem with that is the current failure to comply to policy, > > > i.e. build from source as they should. > > > > > > > The qu

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-20 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > The only problem with that is the current failure to comply to policy, > i.e. build from source as they should. > The question remains is simply removing all the extra source from webmin-n.orig.tar.gz except that which is necessary to build the w

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > The only problem with that is the current failure to comply to policy, > > i.e. build from source as they should. > > > > The question remains is simply removing all the extra source from > web

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok. Lets leave aside for a moment the .debs which would go into contrib > or non-free so would have to be built seperately. What happens if > webmin-squid has an RC bug? As Goswin said, all the webmin-* packages > will be held back from testing.

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-20 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Steve Langasek wrote: > Yep. And given that upstream offers webmin as an all-in-one solution to > web-based management needs, I don't really see any reason why they > shouldn't be kept lock-step with one another. As Debian developers our goal is to make an integrated OS whic

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-20 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Brian May wrote: > When Jaldhar takes about dependancies, I assume he means normal > "Depends", not "Build-Depends"??? > Correct. [...] > Source package has the following files (note: this is called a "source > package" not a "binary package"): > > webmin_1.100.orig.tar.gz

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-20 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:16:03AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:38:10PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > > > > If they get hit by a bus, reassigned by their job to Outer Mongolia, or > > just plain get bored with doing it, we lose that benefit entirely, as > > things stand

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:20:37AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Source package has the following files (note: this is called a "source > > package" not a "binary package"): > > > > webmin_1.100.orig.tar.gz > > webmin_1.100-2.diff.gz > > webmin_1

Re: Binaryless uploads [Was: FTBFS: architecture all packages]

2003-08-19 Thread Adam Heath
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Brian May wrote: > Effectively Jaldhar just needs to merge the source packages together, > and keep the binary packages split. > > However, Jaldhar continues to respond with "we need the binary packages > split.". /me mutters chewbacca under his breath.