On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > > > The only problem with that is the current failure to comply to policy, > > > i.e. build from source as they should. > > > > > > > The question remains is simply removing all the extra source from > > webmin-n.orig.tar.gz except that which is necessary to build the webmin > > binary package (i.e not any of the modules which will have their own > > source and binary packages) an aceptable solution to the problem or not? > > >From what I read in this thread webmin-n.orig.tar.gz also contains > some non-free sources, right? >
It has source for all the modules including the non-free ones. However the binary packages for those modules are built from seperate source packages not this one. > Then you have no choice but split it up to get the rest into main. And > when you don't have a pristine upstream orig.tar.gz you can split it > up as far as you like or need to. > The only reason for having the webmin.orig.tar.gz as it is was to provide something approximating the upstream tarball. It sounds like I don't need to bother about that. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
