Re: ARM toolchain is not up-to-date

2006-07-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 01:47:26PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:31:01PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Some of the ARM buildds are still not using G++

Re: ARM toolchain is not up-to-date

2006-07-28 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:31:01PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Some of the ARM buildds are still not using G++ 4.1 as the default C++ >> > compiler, nearly two months after the default was chan

Re: ARM toolchain is not up-to-date

2006-07-27 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:31:01PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Some of the ARM buildds are still not using G++ 4.1 as the default C++ > > compiler, nearly two months after the default was changed. I already > > reported this over a month ago

Re: ARM toolchain is not up-to-date

2006-07-27 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some of the ARM buildds are still not using G++ 4.1 as the default C++ > compiler, nearly two months after the default was changed. I already > reported this over a month ago to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but it's > still unfixed. That is the correct address, is

ARM toolchain is not up-to-date

2006-07-27 Thread Roger Leigh
Some of the ARM buildds are still not using G++ 4.1 as the default C++ compiler, nearly two months after the default was changed. I already reported this over a month ago to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but it's still unfixed. That is the correct address, isn't it? Please could all the ARM buildds be upda