> > I think we should backout egcs and libstdc++2.8 from hamm and go back to
> > the old g++. For one, altg++ doesn't even work with it.
>
> I strongly disagree. g++2.8/egcs + libstdc++2.8 is the first version of the
> GNU C++ development environment that comes close to supporting ANSI C++;
> pre
On Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 06:12:34PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I think we should backout egcs and libstdc++2.8 from hamm and go back to
> the old g++. For one, altg++ doesn't even work with it.
I strongly disagree. g++2.8/egcs + libstdc++2.8 is the first version of the
GNU C++ development environm
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> severity 20033 grave
> stop
> I just received another bug report (#20978) on Octave not being able to
> run. I had already reassigned the first such report (#20033) to libstdc++2.8
> which does *not* introduce versioned dependencies on its libs even tho
severity 20033 grave
stop
I just received another bug report (#20978) on Octave not being able to
run. I had already reassigned the first such report (#20033) to libstdc++2.8
which does *not* introduce versioned dependencies on its libs even though it
is incompatible with the previous release. Be
4 matches
Mail list logo
