Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I consider this a bug; reports sent to @packages.debian.org
> should go straight through to a maintainer or list of maintainers...
>
> However, this appears to be sent to an upstream development mailing
> list, and it would appear my mail has no
On Oct 22, 2005, at 10:04, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I maintain one such list on alioth, and I have not been able to find a
way to let bug reports and other debian-related messages get into the
lists unmoderated without also accepting a lot of spam. If you or
anyone else can give me a recipe
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sat, October 22, 2005 10:04, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > I maintain one such list on alioth, and I have not been able to find a
> > way to let bug reports and other debian-related messages get into the lists
> > unmoderated wi
On Sat, October 22, 2005 10:04, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I maintain one such list on alioth, and I have not been able to find a
> way to let bug reports and other debian-related messages get into the lists
> unmoderated without also accepting a lot of spam. If you or anyone else
> can give me
[Sean Finney]
> that's a good idea, and i'm imagining that it's probably quite
> a feasible one too. i wonder if anyone who knows more about
> mailman could chime in?
I maintain one such list on alioth, and I have not been able to find a
way to let bug reports and other debian-related messages g
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:23:27PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > yeah. i'd say it's bad practice to have the Maintainer
> > field of a package not go directly to the maintainer(s).
>
> Some packages have the Maintainer: field set to a list, e.g. dpkg, apt,
> tetex, probably most java packages.
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:26:16PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
>> I consider this a bug; reports sent to @packages.debian.org
>> should go straight through to a maintainer or list of maintainers...
>
> yeah. i'd say it's bad practice to have the Mainta
hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:26:16PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> I consider this a bug; reports sent to @packages.debian.org
> should go straight through to a maintainer or list of maintainers...
yeah. i'd say it's bad practice to have the Maintainer
field of a package not go directly to the mai
Hello,
I consider this a bug; reports sent to @packages.debian.org
should go straight through to a maintainer or list of maintainers...
However, this appears to be sent to an upstream development mailing
list, and it would appear my mail has not got through.
Yes I know:
a) I am jumping the gun,
9 matches
Mail list logo
