Em Tue, 01 May 2001 10:10:09 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
>
> palo is the PA-RISC/Linux (architecture specific) boot loader
Hello, this is not the right way of doing an ITP... you should
send it as a bug to wnpp and include aditional information...
(like its web page, its license and so on
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:32:59AM +0530, Viral wrote:
> > As long as it isn't too bothersome for you, would you mind explaining why
> > the kernel doesn't activate it by default? Or why it isn't a `make config'
> > option? And why is a daemon needed for it?
>
> No, its not bothersome to explain.
> As long as it isn't too bothersome for you, would you mind explaining why
> the kernel doesn't activate it by default? Or why it isn't a `make config'
> option? And why is a daemon needed for it?
No, its not bothersome to explain. This extract comes from 2.4.4's
Documentation/i810_rng.txt. I als
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:15:39 +0530
Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:14:22PM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> > Isn't there a kernel driver for that?
>
> Yes, but one needs the daemon to use the driver. One could activate it
> from /proc, but that was removed and move
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:14:22PM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:35:37 +0530
> Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am working on packaging intel-rng-tools. It is the daemon to utilise
> > the RNG on i810 boards. Let me know if anyone is working on this. I
> shall
>
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:35:37 +0530
Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am working on packaging intel-rng-tools. It is the daemon to utilise
> the RNG on i810 boards. Let me know if anyone is working on this. I
shall
> otherwise upload it tonight.
Isn't there a kernel driver for that?
Regards,
> Until these basic packaging paradigms are mastered, I don't think
> this package is fit for uploading yet. Perhaps you should ask for
> more help in debian-mentors (which is for helping new maintainers)?
Besides, there's the little fact that the package is totally useless =).
$ grep ^AR /usr/s
On Sun 03 Sep 2000, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
> I intend to package Country Codes 1.0.3, a text-based ISO3166 country code
> finder (yes, I know there is a Perl module that does the same, but this
> little tool is easier and more flexible). The package is actually already
> made
> and lintian cl
pgpGP9OV5n0Fn.pgp
Description: PGP message
> > Licence:
> >
> > Permission to use, copy, and modify this software and its
> > documentation is granted under no conditions.
> >
> > I will upload it to master in a few days.
>
> "..is granted under no conditions" reads like 'is not granted'.
>
> I.e., there are no conditions under which su
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:37:15PM -0400, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> The reason for a seperate directory is for ease of mirroring and CD
> building. It gives us also an easy way to check if a package can be
> on data.
>
> I will really like to see this one at least second. It's an old thread
> that I
Seconded, this seems a good solution.
Quoting Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 10:35:57AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> > I changed the description so it does not say it is a mirror anymore:
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > Does that help at all?
>
> Not really, but if enough people really think I'm wrong on this I wo
Takao KAWAMURA wrote:
> Licence:
>
> Permission to use, copy, and modify this software and its
> documentation is granted under no conditions.
>
> I will upload it to master in a few days.
"..is granted under no conditions" reads like 'is not granted'.
I.e., there are no conditions under which
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 12:47:33AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Having said that, and thought about the packages I maintain, 'jargon'
> clearly fits in the above category, and will be withdrawn until there is
> an appropriate archive.
nah, don't do that. Wait for wichert's proposal when the lo
On 25-May-99, 04:35 (CDT), Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May, 1999, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > I have the same objection to this I had to the anarchist thing: You're
> > trying to package their website. I don't think we should be doing that.
>
> I changed the description so
On 25-May-99, 01:47 (CDT), Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May, 1999, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > There are other reasons that free software is good (e.g. the ESR
> > utilitarian arguments). Some Debianers might agree with one philosophy,
> > others another. If you're going to
On 24-May-99, 22:06 (CDT), Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are other reasons that free software is good (e.g. the ESR
> > utilitarian arguments). Some Debianers might agree with one philosophy,
> > others another.
>
>
> um.. Debian GNU/Linux
> ^^^
> I'd say that's reason eno
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 10:35:57AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> I changed the description so it does not say it is a mirror anymore:
>
> [..]
>
> Does that help at all?
Not really, but if enough people really think I'm wrong on this I won't
press the issue. I also didn't press the issue with the
> And if you want to you can package the ESR view point and upload it.
Anyone taking bets as to which will be the first to add a depends
on the popularity-contest package ;-)
Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why should they include the GNU view of free software when there are others
around?
Maybe because we're Debian _GNU_/Linux?
Another thought, here is the current doc-base file:
Document: gnu-philosophy
Title: Philosophy of the GNU Project
Author: Richard M. Stallman, Georg C. F. Greve, Tom Hull, Kragen Sitaker, Loyd
Fueston, Michael Stutz, Bjørn Remseth, and others
Abstract: Ideas about free software, and the reasons
On Sun, 23 May, 1999, Joseph Carter wrote:
> I have the same objection to this I had to the anarchist thing: You're
> trying to package their website. I don't think we should be doing that.
I changed the description so it does not say it is a mirror anymore:
new debian package, version 2.0.
s
On Mon, 24 May, 1999, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> > Why does Debian only accept free software? What is so good about free
> > software? It is all explained in this package.
>
> Indeed.
>
> > If your objection remains, I will not uploa
On Mon, 24 May, 1999, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 24-May-99, 12:59 (CDT), Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why does Debian only accept free software? What is so good about free
> > software? It is all explained in this package.
>
> There are other reasons that free software is good (e.
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't like Documentation-only packages if they are not specific to
Debian. It's the 40 MB atromonical dataset in a smaller scale.
> Hmm... perhaps a more catching name like "why-free" would be better?
> No-one's going to read "gnu-philosophy" :-)
I
> > Why does Debian only accept free software? What is so good about free
> > software? It is all explained in this package.
>
> There are other reasons that free software is good (e.g. the ESR
> utilitarian arguments). Some Debianers might agree with one philosophy,
> others another.
um.. Debi
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> Why does Debian only accept free software? What is so good about free
> software? It is all explained in this package.
Indeed.
> If your objection remains, I will not upload the package.
Why?
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian g
On 24-May-99, 12:59 (CDT), Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does Debian only accept free software? What is so good about free
> software? It is all explained in this package.
There are other reasons that free software is good (e.g. the ESR
utilitarian arguments). Some Debianers might
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
On Sun, 23 May, 1999, Joseph Carter wrote:
> I have the same objection to this I had to the anarchist thing: You're
> trying to package their website. I don't think we should be doing that.
>
> Granted I'd rather see this website packaged before one trying to tell me
> all about the good politic
I have the same objection to this I had to the anarchist thing: You're
trying to package their website. I don't think we should be doing that.
Granted I'd rather see this website packaged before one trying to tell me
all about the good political and philosphical things resulting from
anarchy, bu
Hmm... perhaps a more catching name like "why-free" would be better?
No-one's going to read "gnu-philosophy" :-)
Richard Braakman
Bear Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My plan, back when I was exploring the idea of a US-only package
> and/or derived distribution, was to use shared libraries and create
> a special null Kerberos package which would return error codes, something
> very close to the Kerberos 'bones' packag
Leon Breedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Regarding curl, I'll be packaging an SSL enabled version only, as it seems
> that policy doesnt cover a source package building for both US & non-US.
There are a couple packages which do this, mutt-i etc. I think they all make
some minor alteration lik
William Ono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tuXeyes is a X toy that works like xeyes. It is licensed under the GPL
> but uses Qt, so it will go into contrib.
If it is under the GPL, and is dependent upon Qt, then it has an
invalid license, and cannot be distributed. As such it will not be
allowe
William Ono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tuXeyes is a X toy that works like xeyes. It is licensed under the GPL
> but uses Qt, so it will go into contrib.
Um, no, if it's licensed under the GPL, but links to Qt, then it
suffers under the same self-cancelling license issues that KDE does.
And we
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 11:23:36AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote:
> > gtk-doc is the upstream name, but a more distinct name may be
> > preferred to distinguish it from gtk+-docs, libgtk1.2-doc, gnome-docu,
> > gnome-dev-info... Perhaps "gt
My appologies for following up to my own post. Although I checked the
WNPP [Work-Needing and Prospective Packages] and the debian-devel archives
before posting, I was informed by the upstream maintainer that an
intent-to-package has already gone out for this package. I checked the
archives more c
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote:
> gtk-doc is the upstream name, but a more distinct name may be
> preferred to distinguish it from gtk+-docs, libgtk1.2-doc, gnome-docu,
> gnome-dev-info... Perhaps "gtk-doc-tools" ? Maybe keep the source
> called gtk-doc and call the bi
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote:
> Maybe keep the source called gtk-doc and call the binary gtk-doc-tools...
> Suggestions welcome.
That sounds good to me, so there's one vote in favor of it.
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux |
Francesco Tapparo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 09:04:18PM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote:
> device3dfx is a kernel module to allow user-space applications (quake
> :}) access to 3Dfx cards without needing to be run as root.
>
> This package consists *only* of a GP
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 09:04:18PM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> device3dfx is a kernel module to allow user-space applications (quake
> :}) access to 3Dfx cards without needing to be run as root.
>
> This package consists *only* of a GPL'd kernel module. As such it can
> IMHO go in
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> Leon Breedt wrote:
> > apcupsd is a package to monitor and control APC UPS's.
>
> May I ask you where I can download its source code? :)
http://www.brisse.dk/site/apcupsd/index.htm#TOP
> I was looking for it some time ago and wasnt able to find a
Leon Breedt wrote:
> apcupsd is a package to monitor and control APC UPS's.
May I ask you where I can download its source code? :)
I was looking for it some time ago and wasnt able to find any sources of
relatively new versions of apcupsd.
Anyways, great to have this package in Debian.
Regard
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 03:52:11AM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> One other problem, it needs big warnings, anyone with access to the
> device can crash the machine no problem...
>
> Its vaguely possible that it could also allow more, however I've never
> seen anyone mention such..
Someone nee
Justin Maurer wrote:
> > Justin, can you find out if those machines are binary compatible.
> > I've heard that there are two general types flying around (5i and
> > 3i, iirc). I wonder if one new architecture is enough or if we
> > need both - like for mips.
>
> which two machines? the ones the p
One other problem, it needs big warnings, anyone with access to the
device can crash the machine no problem...
Its vaguely possible that it could also allow more, however I've never
seen anyone mention such..
Zephaniah E. Hull..
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 09:04:18PM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote:
> Hi
At 14:56 -0400 1999-05-18, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:45:04PM -0500, Justin Maurer wrote:
well, for the cross compilers, i'm doing /usr/lib/parisc-xxx
e.g,
/usr/bin/parisc-egcs
/usr/bin/parisc-as
etc.
You should really use standard gnu style, such as
parisc-linux-{gcc,as,ld,...}
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:45:04PM -0500, Justin Maurer wrote:
> well, for the cross compilers, i'm doing /usr/lib/parisc-xxx
> e.g,
> /usr/bin/parisc-egcs
> /usr/bin/parisc-as
> etc.
You should really use standard gnu style, such as parisc-linux-{gcc,as,ld,...}
and /usr/parisc-linux/{lib,bin,incl
>> (me saying a bootable kernel is still quite aways off)
> I wonder if this ITP is a little bit early then...
well, sort of. i can still package the cross compilers and such, so that we
will all be ready for it. but the new arch obviously is still another relase
or two away.
i have binutils pa
Justin Maurer wrote:
> consider this my intent to package pa-risc egcs and binutils. the kernel,
> when
> one arrives, too. i speak with the puffins (www.thepuffingroup.com, for those
> who don't know) on a daily basis, so i suppose i am a good candidate. i plan
> to order myself a machine when
Am Sun, 16 May 1999 schrieb Samu:
> i'd like to make the debian packages of portSentry by www.psionic.com
> is there another one working on it ?
I did it already and I am working on logcheck now. However, I am not a
registered debian developer at the moment (I'm planning to register). If you
have a
thanks!! i will send you mail whenever i update the source.
darin
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi Darin!
>
> I was seeking for a tiny finance tracking tool to make better use of my money
> and found Gnofin on freshmeat. I learned that there is no Debian package for
> it s
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 05:15:42PM -0400, Sergey V Kovalyov wrote:
|
|On Sat, 15 May 1999, Anthony Wong wrote:
|
|> The package 'ttfprint' is ready for upload:
|
|Interesting... Is it specific to Chinese, or can it do other truetype
|stuff ? E.g. Russian ?
Yes, ttfprint is specific to Chinese beca
On May 14, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
>
> >* Version for virtual packages is the date of the report (/MM/DD)
>
> Any chance of making that an ISO-8601 format date instead? That is,
> -MM-DD.
>
>- Jim Van Zandt
Done in 0.2.
Chris
--
>* Version for virtual packages is the date of the report (/MM/DD)
Any chance of making that an ISO-8601 format date instead? That is,
-MM-DD.
- Jim Van Zandt
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Anthony Wong wrote:
> The package 'ttfprint' is ready for upload:
>
> Package: ttfprint
> Version: 0.9-1
> Section: text
> Priority: optional
> Architecture: i386
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1), ttf-twmoe-kai | ttf-twmoe-sung
> Installed-Size: 246
> Maintainer: Anthony W
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "ADC" == Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
ADC> Are these two JP specific? I noticed from your uploads that the
ADC> install fails if LANG is unset or set as "C". This kinda warned me
ADC> that maybe it wouldn't work for english?
No. Not JP
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 10:56:34PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Description: Package for printing ISO-Latin-2 on PostScript printers
This is already part of the a2ps package. Are you coordinating with the
maintainter of that package?
Mike Stone
pgp4ABRu59oOQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Takuro KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,I'm packaging software, t-gnus.
> (ftp://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/GNU/elisp/chamonix/gnus/)
>
> t-gnus is latest branch of Semi-gnus.
> Semi-gnus is "Replacement of Gnus with gnus-mime for SEMI."
> and Debian package is available. (main/news).
>
> SEMI is "L
On Fri, May 07, 1999 at 09:06:27PM -0700, Robert Woodcock wrote:
> Hmmm, now that I've uploaded cd-discid I guess I better write an intent to
> package for it :)
>
> cd-discid has long been bundled in cdgrab, but since cdgrab changes so much
> more quickly, and is a simple shell script, the other
>
> Meanwhile, I've identified the following additional packages which can
> be Kerberized immediately via compile-time flags:
>
> IMAP (get your mail from the site you expected; prevent snooping)
> LPRNG (network print to the site you expected; prevent interceptions)
> POSTGRES (grant ac
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Since the sources include an explicit copyright assertion but no explicit
> distribution license
The upstream maintainers indicate in email that the GPL is their choice, which
is wonderful news. Now that this is resolved, I'll upload a package to main
Previously Randolph Chung wrote:
> fetchmail can also be kereberized via compile time flags, and i know of a
> number of people who would be interested in seeing a kerberized fetchmail.
Same for ssh. A pam_kerberos also exists I think.
Wichert.
--
===
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Shaleh wrote:
:
: On 01-Feb-99 Nathan E Norman wrote:
: > On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Shaleh wrote:
: >
: > [ intent to package snipped ]
: >
: > Is there a URL for this, or is the code only available via supernatural
: > revelation?
:
: Only the truly blessed may wonder
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 06:04:45PM +0100, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 08:23:24AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > > I intend to package GoldED when my developer-application processes
> > >
> > > From freshmeat appindex:
> > > GoldED is a very nice console full-screen m
On 01-Feb-99 Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Shaleh wrote:
>
> [ intent to package snipped ]
>
> Is there a URL for this, or is the code only available via supernatural
> revelation?
Only the truly blessed may wonder upon its blessed page ..
No (=
http://flits102-126.flit
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 08:23:24AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > I intend to package GoldED when my developer-application processes
> >
> > From freshmeat appindex:
> > GoldED is a very nice console full-screen mail/newsreader for
> > Fidonet and Internet. It is one of the best of it's kind fo
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 04:16:39PM +0100, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen wrote:
> I intend to package GoldED when my developer-application processes
>
> From freshmeat appindex:
> GoldED is a very nice console full-screen mail/newsreader for
> Fidonet and Internet. It is one of the best of it's kind f
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Shaleh wrote:
[ intent to package snipped ]
Is there a URL for this, or is the code only available via supernatural
revelation?
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.midco.net
finger [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 09:22:28PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> > XGGI is an X server based on XF86 code that will run under any supported
> > libGGI target.
> > Currently, other than a few XF 3.3.3.1 compliance points, XGGI
> > works fine; it's been tested with the
I'm pretty sure xmem was in procps or xproc at one point, and got
dropped because it wasn't being maintained upstream, or something like
that...
There have been several packages allowed into main with
a license like this. Some people don't like it however. Perl's
license is even slightly more restricive. Except that now it
can be licensed under the GPL as well.
From: John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 29 Jan 1999 12:44:5
Ben Pfaff writes:
> That doesn't make it non-free. It's in the standard BSD license.
The word 'fee' does not occur in the standard BSD license. It does not
mention money at all.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
> The reason for non-free is this in copyright:
> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
> purpose, subject to the provisions described below, without fee is
^^^
Have you contacted the author about this?
At 29 Jan 1999 08:48:54 -0500,
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
>purpose, subject to the provisions described below, without fee is
> ^^^
> That doesn't
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:01:28PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > I intend to package all the dummy packages we have been talking about.
> > They match the packages that changed its name in the great X
> > reorganization.
>
> You'll do no such thin
Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The reason for non-free is this in copyright:
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
purpose, subject to the provisions described below, without fee is
^
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 02:01:09PM -0600, David Welton wrote:
> I think it's kind of silly that we no have this more or less
> 'elementary' X package, so I'm offering to package it. Is it
> generated from the X sources (in which case, maybe I'll just limit
> myself to pestering Branden:-), or proc
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 12:00:43PM -0500, Brian Mays wrote:
|> Adam Klein wrote:
|
|>> Oh, fro the rxvt package? hmm. Do I need to incorporate those?
|
|Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
|
|> Well, they are there for a reason, aren't they?
|
|Some of the patches will not need to be added, unless you are
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 02:01:09PM -0600, David Welton wrote:
> I think it's kind of silly that we no have this more or less
^ longer
Sorry...:-/
--
David Welton http://www.efn.org/~davidw
Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.or
Teemu Hukkanen wrote:
>
> from the README:
> ->8-clip->8-
> This package contains a first, fixed release of Linux man pages in Finnish.
>
> There are 132 pages from sections 1 and 6.
>
> If you want to contribute, point your browser to
> www.redhat.sot.com/Man-pages-fi.shtml
>
> Copyrights: The
> Adam Klein wrote:
>> Oh, fro the rxvt package? hmm. Do I need to incorporate those?
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Well, they are there for a reason, aren't they?
Some of the patches will not need to be added, unless you are also
planning to make a Kanji, Greek, or Chinese version of wterm.
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:33:30PM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
> While doing my necessary daily check of Slashdot and Freshmeat,
> I noticed two programs I will most likely use - one is irssi, a
> GTK IRC client that runs in the panel, but I can't package it
> now because none of my GTK-1.1 stuff is
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 09:18:22PM -0500, Avery Pennarun wrote:
> oldpackages="$(dpkg --get-selections
> | egrep '^(xfntbase|xfnt75|...)'
> | awk '{print $1}')"
Oops. I was thinking this part but didn't type it. Yes, of course -- we
don't want to select newpackage f
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 02:53:30PM -0800, Adam Klein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 11:05:43AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > I mean the debian patches. Some of them are incorporated upstream, some are
> > not.
>
> Oh, fro the rxvt package? hmm. Do I need to incorporate those?
Well, th
Branden Robinson writes:
> John Hasler might like it but there are about 400 other people to ask.
I look forward to hearing from them. I just want to see the damn thing
fixed. Santiago has proposed a workable solution and offered to implement
it.
> Barring a better solution, I will be the one t
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:43:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > * "There should be some better way".
> >
> > Fine. Which one?
>
> Is there a way to have a dpkg --set-selections call lurk in the background
> until the current dpkg process ends, like update-menus does now? That
> would be a
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:01:28PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I intend to package all the dummy packages we have been talking about.
> They match the packages that changed its name in the great X
> reorganization.
You'll do no such thing or I will take drastic measures. Those packages
are MIN
Santiago Vila writes:
> I intend to package all the dummy packages we have been talking about.
Go for it.
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I do
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 11:05:43AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> I mean the debian patches. Some of them are incorporated upstream, some are
> not.
Oh, fro the rxvt package? hmm. Do I need to incorporate those?
Adam
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:19:35PM +0100, Jonas Rathert wrote:
> Second the html-documentation of the Standard Template Library. I
> saw this on WNPP an wrote an email to the maintainer, but did not
> get any answer.
Do you mean this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:58:40]:~$ dpkg -s stl-manual
Package: stl-ma
I decided not to package or help this project because of the original license
-- "either GPL your code or dont use Olex". The author is a good guy and is
just trying to promote free software and make sure his work is not used to make
proprietary software.
I think this license is free enough. The
[#include ]
Shaleh hinted that I might want to look at the Olex license. It
does put some restriction on output - which, differently from
the "buttonware" discussion a while ago, seems legitimate to me
since Olex output is full of code written by the Olex author.
So, this is the actual LICENSE.GEN
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 09:40:18AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> While at it, why not add monitor detection, like windows can do?
I plan on doing that, but the VESA DDC specifications are not freely available,
I'm
going to call VESA today and see if I can find out anything about the specs,
I wou
While at it, why not add monitor detection, like windows can do?
Date:
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 01:23:29 -0500
From:
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Re: Intent to package: Xconfig
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:40:47AM -0800, Adam Klein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:17:39AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:06:34AM -0800, Adam Klein wrote:
> >
> > > wterm is another Rxvt hack. It is designed for use with Window Maker,
> > > alt
1 - 100 of 390 matches
Mail list logo
