[#include <not.subscribed.to.these.lists.please.cc.replies.h>] Shaleh hinted that I might want to look at the Olex license. It does put some restriction on output - which, differently from the "buttonware" discussion a while ago, seems legitimate to me since Olex output is full of code written by the Olex author. So, this is the actual LICENSE.GENERATED file:
> This license applies to the source olex generates and to both the > LookAhead.cc and the LookAhead.h file in this package. > > You may > > - apply the GNU Public License. See the LICENSE file that came > with this package. > > - apply the Artistic License as distributed with the most current Perl. > See http://language.perl.com/misc/Artistic.html. > > - apply a different license provided that any user reasonably has access > to the source code of the original olex file. That she/he is allowed to > make changes to the original olex file. That she/he is allowed to > compile this patched olex file and that she/he can relink the resulting > object files with your application, either statically or dynamically. > That she/he is allowed to distribute the resulting binary, the > intermediate object files, the changes to the olex file and the original > to other parties who will receive the same rights. Is this ok for main? Should I print a warning, or even maybe add it to the package description? []s, |alo +---- -- I am Lalo of deB-org. You will be freed. Resistance is futile. http://www.webcom.com/lalo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp key in the web page Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
