Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: rich
* Package name: extundelete
Version : 0.1.8
Upstream Author : Nic Case
* URL : http://extundelete.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : extundelete is a utility which
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rich Ercolani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ext3grep
Version : 0.0.0
Upstream Author : Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html
* License : GPLv3
other one.
submit a small patch to each logging daemon to add/remove this link when
the package is installed/removed?
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 24
situations where one of a selection of packages
can reasonably be installed.
mail transport agent
imap daemon
dns server
proxy server
logging daemon
Presumably, there is a standard way to handle the case of needing to
restart a 1-of-N service handler?
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Sh
letion, for a start.
Under what circumstances would you be typing /r rather than ~/ ?
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487
www.shadow.org.uk
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 08:40:17PM +0000, Rich Walker wrote:
>
>> This is probably a question with an obvious answer, but I couldn't find
>> the answer.
>
>> Why are man pages installed with owner and group &quo
Hi,
This is probably a question with an obvious answer, but I couldn't find
the answer.
Why are man pages installed with owner and group "root" rather than
owner and group "man"?
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 18:46:50]:
>>> Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
>>> apt-get install debcon
ing goes, and the sole rationale
> given is that non-free stuff, while restricting the usage rights of
> the community, is OK to ensure the success of the conference.
Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
apt-get install debconf6-doc
?
cheers, Rich.
--
It's also useful for people using x86-type CPUs without the full 686
instruction set - vis. the Via C3 cpu's, in use in a *lot* of systems.
Not having a 386-compatible kernel+libc, just a 686-compatible one, would
mean you couldn't run Debian at all on those machines.
cheers, Rich.
the changetrack package so that these files are
> ignored, which is obviously not ideal.
Also, the presence of 20MB of extra files in /etc/ is a serious
hindrance on machines with limited disk space or small root partitions.
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL P
"Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/15/05, Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I am having a hard time reading this as anything but a non sequitur.
>>
>> Umm; it follows more from Manoj's comment than
"Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/15/05, Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On 7/15/05, Manoj Srivastava va, manoj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>&g
he problem, and make it available to all of them
would stilt their creativity, hinder their intellect, and prevent the
development of a consistent style!
Sheesh, next you'll be arguing in favour of personal indentation styles!
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company |
Daniel Martins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Site =http://members.chello.at/rene.weichselbaum/etask.el
You mean
http://members.chello.at/rene.weichselbaum/etask.html
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical directo
this means someone who can "prove" that the Debian
Packaging system does this. Which probably means an Official
Debian Person sending the letter, with dates of when the technology was
introduced into Debian, and perhaps extracts from the Packaging Manuals
of the period to show this.
It delays mail from people who haven't mailed you before. This is
*guaranteed* to cause senior people in the company to come knocking on
your door within hours of you turning it on.
Otherwise, I'd use it :->
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROT
o much hassle, and as a service to those
> that use them. But this has to be only a temporary solution.
Point taken.
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1L
angband/browse_thread/thread/d667a1ca262882f7/a198687e1e992879?q=moria+debian+author&rnum=1#a198687e1e992879>
Most of the creditted authors have stated that they are happy for it to
be converted to GPL.
And moria hasn't had a bug in a long time.
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker
#x27;t adopt it (due to lack of time), it would be a
> pity to loose this since there is no comparable commandline tool
fdupes?
Doesn't do partial matching, but is otherwise excellent.
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251
EMAIL PROTECTED]" mail servers is
incomplete,
and the delay introduced on first-time-mails from legitimate sources,
results in screaming from users really quick :-<
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251
forth.
and there are probably a few other easy deductions.
Switching to a "make -j runlevel5"-type system (dependencies encoded in
makefile fragments, some kind of "foo Provides firewall" structure, and
(hard) a method for stopping things as well as starting them would
(a) allo
/refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/runlevels.html>.
Given that they *suggest* a set of runlevels, which provides "one spare for
local config", would it be out of order for users to file wishlist bugs
on packages not following these guidelines?
;function does in no way imply that the older implementation is
> Wrong. iproute does much more than route/ifconfig, which cannot support
> all the features of >= 2.4 networking stacks.
Hey! Some of us still don't need all the features of 2.4!
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker
Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I demand that Rich Walker may or may not have written...
>
>> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> How common was that problem you were trying to solve, again?
>
>> Presumably, you never used an S3 video
t-propagating
universe :->
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487
www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Rich Walker wrote:
>> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > Moore's law is cpu speed.
>>
>> *TRANSISTORS* on a single die
>>
&g
Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 31 May 2005 20:07, Rich Walker wrote:
>
>> Even within these categories there is some need for finer grain.
>>
>> For example, groupware clients are mostly "easy, end-user, corporate"
>> grou
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Moore's law is cpu speed.
*TRANSISTORS* on a single die
<http://www.intel.com/research/silicon/mooreslaw.htm>
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251
et, end-user, corporate
and OurLocalPackages. Now click [Install All Relevant]"
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487
www.shadow.org.uk/
requirements are being met, and would scream like hell if
> one of the hosts was insecure?
Even better - use cfengine to automagically check that the config files
were accurate. Plus, it would make a good example cfengine file for the
documentation package.
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 18:44 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > D) How will the exercise of a veto be communicated to the Project?
>
> An announcement mail with Subject: Vancouvered: $arch, of course.
>
Damn, I love this list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 20:38 +0100, Miros/law Baran wrote:
> 10.01.2005 pisze Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > 'RTFM' means "Go read the documentation, that's what it's for". I
> > > personally find it far more rude to go on a mailing list, ask for the
>
> > Do you *really* think that RTFM
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 05:05 +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
> Even if the d-d for ndiswrapper has done something wrong or not, even if
> the upstream package is better (I don't know the facts, and I'm not
> personally interested), it is NOT necessary to be rude and go on the
> offensive like this. Pleas
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 20:25 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Marcelo
>
> [0] Besides learning that there is still people in this world who seem
> to think that feminism is actually a solution to something. I am
> still amazed by that one.
Not trying to start a subthread, but prob
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Though you could try the following set of criteria:
[I added these back in for the sake of clarity]
>>1. Are there already similar packages in Debian? NO - okay, add.
>
*lot* of CPU monitors, and a finite number of
developers, and I'm sure at least one CPU monitor needs more
maintenance, and wmbubblemon does the same job better, why add another?
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director
g used for servers, routers,
firewalls, X-terminals, and so on, it would be nice if there was a
Debian kernel supporting them. Especially if it supported the crypto
acceleration and hardware RNG available on later VIA cpu s.
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EM
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: Vicodin ES 90 Tab Special. -Free Doctors consultation
-No Rx Required -
hey're right this time. Most of the press releases that have gone
out mention AMD64 instead of x86-64, and the marketing info at amd.com all
mentions AMD64 as well.
--rdp
Rich Payne
http://talisman.mv.com
rdp at talisman dot mv dot com
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 21:49, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:28:50AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> > What comes to encouraging other people - guess what I'm doing right now.
>
> No you are definetly not. You are pissing people off.
>
> > Other platforms aren't nearly as signi
package
owning this file, so I'm submitting this as general; please reassign
as needed.
For edification:
rich: ~ $ dpkg -S *happy*
dpkg: *doc-base-happydoc* not found.
rich: ~ $ dpkg -l *happy*
No packages found matching doc-base-happydoc.
Well, the above I don't understand at all :)
untar'd it on the scratch
box. Seems okay, but we'll see)
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker no-work anarcho and stuff
his signature file no content yet no vanity website
43 matches
Mail list logo
