Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:14:45PM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimarães wrote: > >> (1) LSB -- which Debian's policy vows to follow -- mandates the >> default differentiated runlevels. > > No. Please read > <http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/runlevels.html>.
Given that they *suggest* a set of runlevels, which provides "one spare for local config", would it be out of order for users to file wishlist bugs on packages not following these guidelines? cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director 251 Liverpool Road | need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487 www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
