On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in replying. But I didn't receive your response directly
> (by default the BTS doesn't send followup messages to the bug submitter) .
Sorry, hope you get it directly now ...
> I'm running KDE. icewm also appears to need the full path
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> Speak now or hold your peace forever :)
Thanks for caring about this package!
Have a nice weekend
Andreas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the bug report.
I just want to know which window manager you are using. I did not found
any policy statement about default icon locations. The documentation
of menu states:
...
please put all icon files in the directory
`/usr/X11R6/include/X11/{bitmaps,pixmaps}'
and I
Hello,
auric:~> madison postgresql
postgresql | 6.5.3-27 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
powerpc, sparc
postgresql |7.2.1-2 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excu
Hello,
in the package clustal[wx]_1.82-3 I fixed a buffer overflow and sended the
fix upstream. I do not think that the problem is a real security risk but
in many cases clustalw does not perform correctly so that I think the
latest packages should go into testing. I wonder why it is sticked to
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> after unsuccessful attempts to contact the maintainer of gnuchess, Martin
> Mitchell (he did not answer at all to my emails), I would like to propose
> a change to the packaging of gnuchess. Andreas Tille did at least do an
> NMU to update to version 5.03
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I just tried it, and it seems to work very well. I had no problems
> booting whatsoever.
I did just a quick look (no real install just booted and selected the
language) and I really like the i18n stuff!!!
Great job! Many thanks!
Kind regards
Hello,
it would be nice if treetool could be available for all released architectures.
Cureently only ia64 is missing.
auric:~> madison treetool
treetool |2.0.2-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, powerpc,
sparc treetool |2.0.2-2 | testing | source, alpha, arm, i386, m
Hello,
in general I like the idea of descriptions of manpages. I would like it
even more if it would regard i18n descriptions which are produced by
the ddtp server.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Stop talking about one's time. I won't repeat myself.
The discussion started because someone stated that he has not enough
time. Moreover I talked about a second aspect: Confusing users.
I'll now save my time and stop posting to this thre
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> > IMHO two tools with the same functionality are
> > 1. confusing for users
> > 2. waste of time for developers. They should spend their time
> > to make one better tool instead of two good tools.
>
> The implementation language really does make a
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Welcome to the Free Software world.
Hmm, I've thought I would just be here. :)
> There are plenty of editors, MUA, MTA and so on because people
> want to have fun doing something (and often learning from this
> experience), even if i
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
> and dput?
IMHO two tools with the same functionality are
1. confusing for users
2. waste of time for developers. T
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Martin Schulze wrote:
> sh is somewhat deprecated at the moment due to a required
> decision wrt. sh3/sh4 and big/little endianess. No buildd
> is currently running for binary-sh because of this. Just
> stay tuned, the port will eventually continue.
I really do not care abou
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Unfortunately I'm excuriatingly busy with other things [0] until
> mid-February, so I just don't have time to pester three or four
> dozen people personally on a daily basis to get the release out. That
> *shouldn't* be necessary; just getting rid of the
Hello,
second call for help to compile MusixTex on all architectures:
auric:~> madison musixtex
musixtex | 1:0.98-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
powerpc, sparc
musixtex | 1:0.99-1 | testing | source, arm, ia64, m68k, powerpc,
sparc
musixtex | 1:0.99-1 |
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Now that you got my suggested patches for the last part of i18n for apt,
> I wonder (once again): Are you going to try to get this into woody?
At least a test-suite would be great.
> If not, I plan to do something, I'm not sure what. I could NMU, but I
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Will Lowe wrote:
> > Is there any deb available for it?
>
> Not currently. If there's a lot of demand I'll package it, but it
> seemed silly to bloat the Packages file further by making a .deb
> containing 139 lines of perl.
Why not fileing a wishlist bug against an apropriat
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> I have just uploaded for powerpc.
Thanks. Hamish wrote me he did it for hppa and I just did for sparc.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Hello,
some time ago I did an NMU of MusixTex which was accepted by the
maintainer. I can't see any reason why this did not entered
testing:
~> madison musixtex
musixtex | 1:0.98-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
powerpc, sparc
musixtex | 1:0.99-1 | testing | sou
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Sounds good. Maybe we should provide a description of this technique
> somewhere within webml or ddp.
>
> WWW/doc folks: any hint about sponsorship uploading practices?
At least an FAQ would be apropriate in my opinion.
A better solution would be
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, James Bromberger wrote:
[at debian-private - but of course it can be also discussed open and so
I move here ...]
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:35:47AM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > there were some rumors that there would be the Debian Conference 2
> &g
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> So, dear co-developers, please join debian-mentors@lists.debian.org and
> respond to future maintainers, and sponsor those who are asking it.
> Also check out the sponsor page that is listing about 30 future
> maintainers who are looking for a sponsor :
On 4 Jan 2002, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> I'm using LVM and XFS filesystems on my computer at home. This
> morning, after I pushed "g" from the Gnus *Group* buffer (to get new
> mail), it stopped part way through with an error message. Gnus
> prompted me in the XEmacs minibuffer saying "no sp
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> In the "research" category -- how about medical imaging? I have considered
> packaging the MINC tools from our lab (www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca) that are used
> in brain research. And someone else previously packaged (or at least sent
> an ITP) other tools
On 6 Jan 2002, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The same is the situation for pingus. I tried to email the maintainer
> 2001-12-23, no reply yet. No changes in > 260 days. Last upload was
> NMU. I've tried to email the one doing NMU after a bug squashing
> party in April 2001. Not sure what more
Hello,
a new year seems to be the right starting point for a new project :).
So here we are:
_ _ __ ___
| _ \ ___ | |__ (_) __ _ _ __ | \/ | ___ __| |
| | | | / _ \| '_ \ | | / _` || '_ \ _ | |\/| | / _
Hello,
I had a short e-mail exchange with the maintainer of the wxgtk packages
Ron Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> because I asked him, whether he would plan
a package for python2 because a program I want to pack depends from
it.
Ron isn´t actually a big user of wxPython himself and he said hi is quite
p
Hello,
any news from the Interbase Debian packages?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Edward Betts wrote:
> > # chattr -V -i postgres.log.7.gz
> > chattr 1.22, 22-Jun-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
> > chattr: Permission denied while trying to stat postgres.log.7.gz
>
> chattr -V -ai postgres.log.7.gz maybe?
It´s the same as above (and I expect it to stay so u
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Tille, Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010914 13:06]:
> > Maintainer: Debian QA team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >* changed maintainer field to
> > Maintainer: Debian QA team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Edward Betts wrote:
> I had the same problem, just worked out how to fix it, I used the chattr
> program, see the chattr man page for more details.
Could you please be a little bit more detailed?
# chattr -V -i postgres.log.7.gz
chattr 1.22, 22-Jun-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/0
On 14 Sep 2001, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> #92294: sysadmin-guide; Missing Build-Depends-Indep
I´m ready to upload a fixed package with the following changes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 11:54:54 +0200
Source: sysadmin-guide
Binary: sysadmin-guid
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> i would suggest the immutable flag, but AFAIK reiserfs has no such
> thing.
Even if it would have - I do not use such nifty things on a testing box ...
> sure someone isn't playing a joke on you and replaced /bin/su with
> fakeroot ;-)
:)
But I can rm an
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Corrupted filesystem, unlink that file and try again.
Hmmm, I have also a relict of older ReiserFS (from 2.4.4 or so) on
my HD (I´m so happy that I didn´t used it on a critical box and perhaps
never will do so ...):
/var/lug# whoami
root
/var/lug# un
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 12:04:10PM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > By the way: That lpadmin does not work seems to be a bug but a feature -
> > at least I had the same result as you. :-((
> > The web frontend worked for me after
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I never asked for a debconf interface (I explained in the bug report
But why not following Grisus suggestion?
In my opinion the problem is an obvious target for a debconf solution.
The user has just to press one times:
Do you want locales [y/N]
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> I have yet to meet a person who would ever need a slovak locale.
> Nobody cares at all (collate order? who needs that? Different
> format of numbers? This is not only unneeded, but even harmful.
> Different format of date? Who cares.. Gettext? Maybe, bu
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Since this should probably be by-package and not by-maintainer, how
> about a field in debian/control? (I'm not sure it really belongs
> there, but there were some advantages if it were there; e.g. it can
> easily be controlled by the maintainer.)
If t
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Michael Bramer wrote:
> OH, this is now the second 'remove me' request.
>
> Now the server can only mail notifications to all packages or to no
> packages. Should I stop it?
>
> Comments?
Example for a procmail rule in the information part?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Ari Makela wrote:
> Just about anyone who's not from English speaking countries. For
> example, we Finns need 'åäö' and their capital versions. They just
> don't work if you don't set locales right. If you take a look at even
> just European languages you can see that most of
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I used to tell everyone we need no fancy GUI for configuration as our
> postinst scripts take care of all that. All you need to know is
> dpkg-reconfigure if you want to change anything.
>
> That probably won't work with cups.
I´m really sure that debcon
42 matches
Mail list logo
