On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Unfortunately I'm excuriatingly busy with other things [0] until
> mid-February, so I just don't have time to pester three or four
> dozen people personally on a daily basis to get the release out. That
> *shouldn't* be necessary; just getting rid of the RC bugs that everyone
> should already be feeling guilty about would get us right back on track;
> but it appears that it is.
Perhaps a statement:
#define NUM_DAYS 150 /* or some better value */
#define TIME_TO_FIX 30 /* ditto */
The following packages will not go into woody because they have
RC bugs for > NUM_DAYS days if they will not be fixed after
TIME_TO_FIX days.
Kind regards
Andreas.
