Anthony Towns writes:
> Travis Crump wrote:
>> Should changelogs be in chronological order or should they be in
>> version number order?
>
> The changelog should be in the order changes were made.
Isn't that necessarily chronological order?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For a GPLed project, the declaration looks something like this:
>
> * Copyright (C) Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Shouldn't you include a year?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Recommends means "packages that would be found together with this one in all
> but unusual installations". It is not unusual to have a single designated
> build machine in an organization, which may or may not ever have the final
> binary packages inst
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:17:19PM -0600, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
>> It seems like the common case for wanting to install a kernel module
>> source package is to build the module and then install it on the same
>> box.
It seems like the common case for wanting to install a kernel module
source package is to build the module and then install it on the same
box. Since the *-source package doesn't really depend on *-utils, why
not add a Recommends line?
For example, ndiswrapper-source would Recommend ndiswrapper-u
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why should elf-aggregation always mean to be part of a derived code, and
> fs-level aggregation mean that not? Even e.g. Linus writes that there
> _are_ examples where elf-aggregation does not mean a derived work (well,
> of course: the default assumptat
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:56:43PM +0200, Maciej Dems wrote:
>> > Of course this won't be created online, but such images could be put
>> > on web after some time and could be identified with some session id.
>> > (in addition user would be fo
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there *any* way to check what packages are available on particular CD
> without downloading iso and mounting it locally?
>
> If not (and I'm assuming that's the right answer) then what about adding
> some txt files alongside isos?
I think
"John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This package is buildable by tools in main. It meets the letter of the
> law. The spirit seems a bit ambiguous. Good case in point, the m68k
> cross-compiled stuff, where the cross-compiler used was non-free. (I
> have not verified the accuracy
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:37:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> Price for Commercial Software:
>> > Adobe Illustrator CS - 90.00
>> > Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional - 100.00
>> > McAfee Personal Firewall Plus 2004 v. 5.0 - 20.00
>> > Adobe Photoshop Elements
10 matches
Mail list logo
