On Wednesday, March 1, 2023, wrote:
> March 1, 2023 5:11 AM, "Toshaan Bharvani | VanTosh"
wrote:
>> Yes, please, I am interested.
>> I would use it for PowerEL, LibreBMC and LibreSOC.
>> All open source projects.
>> Is this just a board or also a CPU?
>
> It is just the motherboard. :)
so some
On Tuesday, February 28, 2023, wrote:
> Hello you fabulous developers!
>
> My friend has a spare Talos II motherboard that is currently sitting in
his house
> in Indiana USA collecting dust.
>
> https://www.raptorcs.com/TALOSII/
>
> I have convinced him to donate/sell it to an open source project
> Do you have a publication of that analysis? I was thinking the same
> about the organization of Debian for some time but never did analysis
> or compared it to other distros.
i found it here http://lkcl.net/reports/wot/ it's dated 2017 (not a bad
guess, 4 years). please bear in mind, the primary
https://yro.slashdot.org/story/21/07/05/2155212/open-source-audio-editor-audacity-has-become-spyware
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Friday, August 23, 2019, Karsten Merker wrote:
>
> and decide for themselves who is displaying "violent hatred" on
> mailing lists and come to their own judgement about your
> allegations:
You've now violated the Debian Conduct twice in under an hour.
https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 7:58 PM Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:49:57AM +0800, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> > The last time that we spoke, Theo, some time around 2003 you informed me
> > that you were doing so very deliberately "to show everyo
On Thursday, August 22, 2019, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:03:01AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> wrote:
> >
> > so i hope that list gives a bit more context as to how serious the
> > consequences of dropping 32 bit support really is.
i remembered a couple more:
* the freescale iMX6 has a 19-year supply / long-term support (with
about another 10 years to go). it's used in the bunnie huang "Novena
Laptop" and can take up to 4GB of RAM. processor core: *32-bit* ARM
Cortex A9, in 1, 2 and 4-core SMP arrangements.
* the Zync 700
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 3:31 PM Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> >>>>> "\Luke" == Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes:
> Hi.
> First, thanks for working with you.
> I'm seeing a lot more depth into where you're coming from, and it is
> greatly appreci
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 2:52 PM Sam Hartman wrote:
> I think my concern about your approach is that you're trying to change
> how the entire world thinks.
that would be... how can i put it... an "incorrect" interpretation. i
think globally - i always have. i didn't start the NT Domains
Reverse
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 1:17 PM Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'd ask you to reconsider your argument style.
that's very reasonable, and appreciated the way that you put it.
> I'm particularly frustrated that you spent your entire reply moralizing
> and ignored the technical points I made.
ah: i really
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:29 PM Sam Hartman wrote:
> Your entire argument is built on the premise that it is actually
> desirable for these applications (compilers, linkers, etc) to work in
> 32-bit address spaces.
that's right [and in another message in the thread it was mentioned
that builds h
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > a proper fix would also have the advantage of keeping linkers for
> > *other* platforms (even 64 bit ones) out of swap-thrashing, saving
> > power consumption for build hardware and costing a lot less on SSD and
> > HDD regular replacement
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:39 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> We are at a point were we should probably look for a real solution
> instead of relying on tricks.
*sigh* i _have_ been pointing out for several years now that thi
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 1:49 PM Ivo De Decker wrote:
>
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On 8/8/19 10:38 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > 32-bit processes are able to address at maximum 4GB of memory (2^32),
> > and often less (2 or 3GB)
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:30 PM Mike Hommey wrote:
> > it would be extremely useful to confirm that 32-bit builds can in fact
> > be completed, simply by adding "-Wl no-keep-memory" to any 32-bit
> > builds that are failing at the linker phase due to lack of memory.
>
> Note that Firefox is built
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22831 sorry using phone to
type, mike, comment 25 shows some important options to ld gold would it be
possible to retry with those? 32 bit. Disabling mmap looks really important
as clearly a 4gb+ binary is guaranteed going to fail to fit into 32bit mm
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:26 AM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:01 AM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> wrote:
> trying this:
>
> $ python evil_linker_torture.py 3000 400 200 50
>
> running with "make -j4" is going to take a few
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:01 AM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> i'm going to see if i can get above the 4GB mark by modifying the
> Makefile to do 3,000 shared libraries instead of 3,000 static object
> files.
fail. shared libraries link extremely quickly. reverted to
$ python evil_linker_torture.py 3000 100 100 50
ok so that managed to get up to 1.8GB resident memory, paused for a
bit, then doubled it to 3.6GB, and a few seconds later successfully
outputted a binary.
i'm going to see if i can get above the 4GB mark by modifying the
Makefile to do 3,000 sh
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:27 AM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> i'm just running the above, will hit "send" now in case i can't hit
> ctrl-c in time on the linker phase... goodbye world... :)
$ python evil_linker_torture.py 2000 50 100 200
$ make -j8
oh,
$ python evil_linker_torture.py 2000 50 100 200
ok so it's pretty basic, and arguments of "2000 50 10 100"
resulted in around a 10-15 second linker phase, which top showed to be
getting up to around the 2-3GB resident memory range. "2000 50 100
200" should start to make even a system
On Tuesday, January 8, 2019, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:46:41PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> wrote:
>
> > At some point apps are going to become so insanely large that not even
> > disabling debug info will help.
>
> That's less
On Tuesday, January 8, 2019, Mike Hommey wrote:
> .
>
> Note that Firefox is built with --no-keep-memory
> --reduce-memory-overheads, and that was still not enough for 32-bts
> builds. GNU gold instead of BFD ld was also given a shot. That didn't
> work either. Presently, to make things link at a
(hi edmund, i'm reinstating debian-devel on the cc list as this is not
a debian-arm problem, it's *everyone's* problem)
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 12:40 PM Edmund Grimley Evans
wrote:
> > i spoke with dr stallman a couple of weeks ago and confirmed that in
> > the original version of ld that he wro
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:46 PM Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> [ Please note the cross-post and respect the Reply-To... ]
>
> Hi folks,
>
> This has taken a while in coming, for which I apologise. There's a lot
> of work involved in rebuilding the whole Debian archive, and many many
> hours spent analy
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:18 AM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> So: what's the best outcome for our *current* users? Again, pick only one.
here's a perspective that may not have been considered: how much
influence and effect on purchasing decisions would the choice made
have?
we k
https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68/micro-desktop
i've been working on a strategy to make it possible for people to have
more control over the hardware that they own, and for it to cost less
money for them to do so, long-term. i've had to become an open
hardware developer in order to do that.
i b
http://news.slashdot.org/story/15/06/09/1722236/mozilla-responds-to-firefox-user-backlash-over-pocket-integration
after seeing this, i'm becoming increasingly alarmed at where firefox
is going [the first signs were the way in which the announcement was
made to focus on "speed improvements" when ch
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Axel Wagner wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes:
>> what *does* concern me is that it takes such incredible (and amazing)
>> efforts by people like adam for the average end-user or sysadmin to
>> contemplate replacing {in
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:52:21PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Josh Triplett
>> wrote:
>
>> > So, please go educate yourself on what libsystemd0 actually does
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> So, please go educate yourself on what libsystemd0 actually does,
i know what it does, and what it does - technically - is *not* the
issue that i am concerned about.
> and if
> for some reason you still consider it a problem after doing
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> which should help answer the question you asked: your work - fantastic
> as it is - was *impossible to find*. it doesn't even remotely come up
> on the radar of queries. *nobody knows what you've ach
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to apologise for my mail I sent about two hours ago. I have
> overreacted mainly because of the length of the email, CAPS INSIDE and
> also because it's a topic which is being discussed for more than a year
> and which ma
adam, i apologise for not being in a position to reply in-thread: as
mentioned previously i tried (via gmane) but the entire discussion is
completely missing, and i forgot to ask people in the original post to
cc me if they would like an ongoing threaded reply.
i also notice that you removed debia
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 18:20, claude juif wrote:
>> Really rude answer. Really bad.
>
> I find it really rude to send emails of about 300 lines of text in
> total. Extremely rude.
i did apologise in advance, and explained why i to
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:20 PM, claude juif wrote:
>
>
> 2015-02-17 17:55 GMT+01:00 Andrew Shadura :
>>
>> Hi Luke,
>>
>> On 17 February 2015 at 17:28, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>> wrote:
>> > <265 lines of text and counting snipped>
>
ok, so there's been quite a discussion, both on slashdot, where
amazingly the comments that filtered to the top were insightful and
respectful, and also here on debian-devel and debian-users. as i
normally use gmane to reply (and maintain and respect threads) but
this discussion is not *on* gmane,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Am 16.02.2015 um 02:54 schrieb Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton:
>>
>> http://lkcl.net/reports/removing_systemd_from_debian/
>
>
> It's funny that when Wheezy (not Jessie!) came out, nobody complained
> that
http://lkcl.net/reports/removing_systemd_from_debian/
i've documented the process by which it is possible to run some of the
debian desktop window managers (TDE, fvwm, twm etc.) without the need
for systemd or libsystemd0 or any components related to systemd
whatsoever.
the process is not without
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Wookey wrote:
> The debian-port arm64 rebootstrap is progressing nicely, and we just
> passed 4200 source packages built, with another few hundred
> pending. There are now 2 buildds running.
awesome
> Thus I'd love it if anyone else could help go through the fai
> suggestion, wookey: i'd love to help... but obviously with no
> hardware that's kinda hard: is there a clear set of instructions
> somewhere - a wiki page for example - on how to debootstrap an arm64
> qemu so that even if it's dead slow it's still possible to help out?
https://wiki.debian.org/
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> buildds
>> ===
>>
>> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
>> don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
>> developm
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:09 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> > Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
> [...]
&
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We
> don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using
> development boards as build machines. They work, but they're a PITA
> for hosting and they're not designe
folks, hi,
please take a deep breath before reading.
i'm keenly aware of the view that many people hold of me in debian.
that i'm even bringing something to your attention and asking for your
help (not for me, personally) should therefore tell you a lot more
than needs to actually be said.
i'm p
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> now, i've discussed this on the bugtracker and there clearly isn't -
> and really shouldn't be - a listed debian dependency between
> linux-image-2.6.39 kernel and a userspace library. however
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Wookey wrote:
> In my experience anyone distributing binaries actually picks a small
> set of distros and builds for those explicitly, rather than relying
> on the LSB. Does that mean that it's not actually useful in the real
> world? I guess in a sense this posti
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Oscar Morante wrote:
> Have you seen this project [1]? It looks like they have been already
> thinking about the git+bittorrent idea.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/gittorrent/
yes. it's effectively shelved. the name "gittorrent" was abandoned
and the name "mi
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> Just - Wow... thanks!
>
> Hopefully digesting of this tasty post would not cause too much of farting ;-)
:)
> seems might be worth adding (if I am not missing the point), then the
> concept of "derivatives" would then converge finally
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 06:07:27PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> hi folks,
>>
>> i don't know if you're aware of the ... issues shall we say ...
>> surrounding xulrunner 1.9.2 but there'
hi folks,
i don't know if you're aware of the ... issues shall we say ...
surrounding xulrunner 1.9.2 but there's a few changes going on.
python-xpcom is being *dropped* from xulrunner as a first class
citizen and is being turned into a third-rate one. this isn't a
problem right now because debia
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> wrote:
>> apologies for butting-in without being able to continue the thread,
>> but i've just seen this:
>> http://advogato.org/person/etbe/diary/779.html
&g
apologies for butting-in without being able to continue the thread,
but i've just seen this:
http://advogato.org/person/etbe/diary/779.html
which links to this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/05/msg00067.html
can i please gently remind people that depinit solved the security and
fork-bo
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> *Precisely* what changes do you need for that "architecture" - is it
> really a different architecture from armel? (Answers to debian-embedded
> please.)
hi neil,
firstly thank you for the informative post, esp. the history about
actually
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:20:04PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> yeah - i'd like to know how to do this, too. i installed buildd (and
>> wannabuild) but there appears to be some "manual" ste
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Luke,
hiya thomas.
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> * build.py would be... ohh... perhaps something like... autoconf.
> Not more like make?
*hand-waving* :)
>I never ca
folks, hi,
with respect to RFP #501744 pyjamas package, i thought it best to
explain the code's layout and also ask some advice on where files
should be installed.
pyjamas is general-purpose compiler technology, not just a random
"dumb" tool with a single fixed - and unexpandable - purpose. the
li
with this guy, instead of me.
thanks.
@end note to debian developers
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> tags #408467 wontfix
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 12:50:26AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > i've been looking for t
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:29:12AM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> Relax, nobody is being pissed. You just have to realize that if you tell
> person A about a problem, person B doesn't magically get notified about it.
> This is not different than in other situations in real life.
heya dirk,
t
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 02:04:45PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Matthew Garrett [Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:50:56 +]:
>
> > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > i've thought for a long time about how to reply to your message.
>
> &
its users are so
XXX XX we interrupt this email to bring you some light
refridgerator i mean elevator music.
ahh, i feel better now. calm, calm. i am at oe with the universe.
i am bleeennnnded in.
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 04:06:54AM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 De
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 11:42:00PM +0100, antoine wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 20:20 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > manoj, hi,
> >
> > i am delighted to see the above web page re: selinux.
> Err?
never seen it before :)
> >
> > i notice
manoj, hi,
i am delighted to see the above web page re: selinux.
i notice you mention that there is an effort underway to make
a uml-selinux.
perhaps i should mention that it is utterly trivial to set up
a xen system with a guest domain running pretty much any kind
of kernel - including selinux
uhhn... is it just me, or has the world's internet traffic just taken
a major performance degradation over the past few days?
roll up roll up, get yorr anti-virus sofwarz here - right from a debian
mirror. all you have to do is get the debian developers to do _another_
major release. noo more pr
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:44:30PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> It's been implied that people will be basicly *forced* to use selinux,
wrong. completely wrong.
in the debian kernel builds (as arranged i believe by
manoj), the default option for the selinux kernel module is
"selinux=0".
that
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:56:17PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > last time i spoke to him [name forgotten] the maintainer
> > of coreutils would not accept the coreutils patches -
> > already completed and demons
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:24:31PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > any progress on making libselinux1 a "Required" package?
> >
> > the possibility of having debian/selinux is totally dependent
hi,
any progress on making libselinux1 a "Required" package?
the possibility of having debian/selinux is totally dependent
on this one thing happening.
no libselinux1="Required", no debian/selinux [all dependent packages
e.g. coreutils will be "policy violations"].
l.
--
--
http://lkcl.net";>
manoj, thank you. thank you thank you *smooch*.
l.
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 10:11:01AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 10:28 +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 11:06:06PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:15 +0000, Luke Kenneth Cas
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 11:06:06PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:15 +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> > default: no.
>
> Why not on by default,
i would agree with stephen that it should be compiled in,
default options "selinux=n
- Forwarded message from Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 16:37:30 +
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Subject: Re: Updated SELinux Release
From: Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [E
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:02:35AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 21:15:38 -0500, Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 19:21 +, Dhruv Gami wrote:
> >> Personally, i would prefer to have those two tarballs available. I
> >> know most people
i'm forwarding this to debian devel for people's attention because
it would appear that debian has lost a quite large opportunity -
by not having selinux available.
l.
- Forwarded message from "SourceForge.net Team" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Hello,
You are receiving this email because you
did anybody see this behaviour on an update?]
>
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 04:52:51PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Never seen this upgrade behaviour. Was libgcc1 installed before
> > > libstdc++5? If not, please could y
76 matches
Mail list logo
