Re: Release file changes

2011-02-24 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 24 February 2011 11:29, Luca Niccoli wrote: > Did Packages.diff/Index use to contain an MD5sum? (it doesn't as of now) > Or is this some unrelated breakage? Mmm, if worked using ftp.debian.org, so it was a mirror problem I guess. Aptitude and apt didn't have any problem

Re: Release file changes

2011-02-24 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 21 February 2011 15:39, Joey Hess wrote: > Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> until today our Release files included 3 Hashes for all their entries: >> MD5SUM, SHA1, SHA256. I just modified the code to no longer include >> MD5SUM in *all* newly generated Release files. cowbuilder --create fails with: W

Re: Archive area for clamz (Amazon MP3 downloader)

2010-05-30 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 30 May 2010 16:56, Martin Wuertele wrote: > You could suggest clamz und detect runtime if it is present. That would > allow your package to go in main and still use the funtionality of clamz > in case it was installed. Sure; what I wanted to point out (and I probably wasn't clear about it) is

Re: Archive area for clamz (Amazon MP3 downloader)

2010-05-30 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 30 May 2010 04:47, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I think the policy being applied is that if a package is only useful in > conjunction with non-free data, it belongs in contrib (just as if it > depends on some non-free library). I see a potential problem with this policy: say I write a DFSG-complian

Re: shutdown on power button?

2010-05-19 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 19 May 2010 16:38, Luca Niccoli wrote: > File it to the BTS please. Hint: since you already found out that the culprit was /etc/acpi/powerbtn-acpi-support.sh, running $reportbug /etc/acpi/powerbtn-acpi-support.sh would have automatically filed a bug against the package that owns it.

Re: shutdown on power button?

2010-05-19 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 19 May 2010 16:30, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > But as every good luser i opened powerdevil and set it to lock the screen, so > for me it was totally unreasonable since it did something else than what i had > manually configured to do. Then it's a bug in acpi-support-base, since the powerbtn scri

Re: [Debian-eeepc-devel] Ethernet not working on 1005HA

2010-05-19 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 19 May 2010 16:09, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > Just upgraded to the latest bits from squeeze, and ethernet is not > working here. Tried modprobing atl1c but that did not change anything. > Ethernet was working before the upgrade. Anyone else has this problem? See bug #573607 The kernel fixing t

Re: shutdown on power button?

2010-05-19 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 19 May 2010 16:10, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: >> Right, if you do not have a DE running, one way to react on the power >> button is using acpid *and* acpi-support-base. > But if i have it (and most of the time this is the case) it's just very > annoying having configured kde to lock the screen and

Re: shutdown on power button?

2010-05-19 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 19 May 2010 14:10, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > It is, i just turned off my laptop (installed in march) for mistake, and i > dindn't install manually acpid. It's not acpid that shuts down the computer on power button, it's acpi-support-base (installed by default) If you pressed the power button o

Re: Parallellizing the boot in Debian Squeeze - ready for wider testing

2010-05-09 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 8 May 2010 19:07, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Perhaps you are right.  Perhaps we should do a poll to collect > information on how testers experience their boot with > CONCURRENCY=makefile, to make it easier to switch with some confidence > that it would work for most users. :) It just came t

Re: Suggestions to fix #433462 (add free space info to reportbug)

2010-03-16 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 16 March 2010 00:12, Sandro Tosi wrote: > That said, what to report? Simply taking the output of "df -h" and > attaching to reportbug template it's not what I like: there could be > more partitions/disks not interesting for the report/system in that > output, and I don't want to include them.

Re: Removing the manpage requirement for GUI programs?

2010-03-05 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 5 March 2010 17:46, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Le 27/02/2010 22:11, markus schnalke a écrit : > >> Man pages have one more important advantage: Every command has one. > > Which is not true, and the point of the discussion. I think it should have read: They (should) provide a uniform way to ac

Re: Removing the manpage requirement for GUI programs?

2010-03-03 Thread Luca Niccoli
2010/2/27 Josselin Mouette : > GUI applications usually take only a few simple command-line options, > and more importantly, when you use a modern development framework, these > options will always be documented correctly with the --help switch. Manuals are not only for documenting command line s

Re: Build logs from local builds

2009-10-27 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/10/27 Ben Hutchings : > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:15:39PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > >> I believe a better approach is to collect stats on who upload packages >> which fail to build on all architectures, and add a process to [...] > Well you can kick out the kernel team then, becaus

Re: btrfs

2009-10-14 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/10/7 The Fungi : > Now if only it had CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS Pass modeset=1 as a parameter to the module. Cheers, Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Discussion: New feature for source packages

2009-09-15 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/9/16 Russ Allbery : > If there were a document of how to do automated module builds using > triggers or a kernel hook, I'd be happy to try that as well. I tried to set up a kernel hook with the script I attached before, but failed. If run by the kernel package postinst, m-a can't get the loc

Re: Discussion: New feature for source packages

2009-09-15 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/9/15 Hans-J. Ullrich : > Hi Luca, > > just to make it clear: It is not the problem, how I can solve this problem! > This problem I can easy solve with a little shell script. But there are lots > of unexperienced users, which are not able to script themselve. They are just > users. For those p

Re: Discussion: New feature for source packages

2009-09-15 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/9/14 Hans-J. Ullrich : > Problem: Whenever I upgrade to a new kernelversion, or there are new versions > of kernel-modules or other packages, which are only available in source-code, > it is necessary to build the new versions manually. This is rather annoying > and it might be a problem for

Re: postfix as default-mta? [Re: Bug#508644: new release goal default-mta?]

2009-05-07 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/5/7 Brian May : > esmtp can do this, if you configure it to use procmail or something. I use and like esmtp, but I don't see how we could depend on it as default MTA if it has to deliver local mail: like you said there must be procmail installed and esmtp needs some configuration to use it.

Re: Yes, we have bugs

2009-04-15 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/4/15 David Nusinow : > This is absurd. You agree that Hal fills an important need, yet you don't > like it because it's currently buggy? What the hell are you doing running I wrote that **an** abstraction layer is the way to go. I deem hal flawed by design, sorry about that, all my skills (n

Re: Yes, we have bugs

2009-04-15 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/4/15 David Nusinow : > Please see the reply I just posted to the bug for a partial explanation of > why using hal is important for more than just hotplugging. I'll be writing > up a more complete explanation soon. I understand that hal fills an important gap in linux; I think that from an ar

Re: Yes, we have bugs

2009-04-15 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/4/15 Josselin Mouette : > Or maybe it is just that the Utopia maintainers, just like those of > Linux, KDE, GNOME, Mozilla or X.org, receive too many bug reports > compared to the amount they can handle. Bugs assigned to HAL are often > caused by buggy drivers or other kernel bugs, or they ne

Re: RFA: acpi-support -- glue layer for translating laptop buttons, plus legacy suspend support

2009-04-15 Thread Luca Niccoli
[not CC-ing the RFA, I did it by mistake before and I don't think this is so relevant to that specific matter] 2009/4/15 Mike Hommey : > Bug count is not a good metric. Take a look at the bug count for linux-2.6, > glibc, iceweasel... Fair enough. Is there a convenient way to measure how long a

Re: RFA: acpi-support -- glue layer for translating laptop buttons, plus legacy suspend support

2009-04-15 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/4/12 Raphael Hertzog : > Expect grumpy people every time that you add something new that they have > to learn. I also had troubles with hal and X when I tried the X servers in > experimental. But I have not read any serious criticism based on technical > facts in the bug report you showed. I

Re: [dissenting]: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-23 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/3/23 Lucas Nussbaum : >> Secondly, the GR process depends heavily on the possibility of developers >> to offer amendments and extra options on the ballots. In particular it >> is vital that middle-ground options get on the ballot. Requiring of them >> a high number of seconds might bar them f

Re: group nvram

2009-03-18 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/3/18 Marco d'Itri : > This is the complete list of groups which I'd rather stop using: > >    fuse (I have no idea about how FUSE works) Neither do I, I see FUSE helper binary is set suid, and executable only for fuse members, but there could be more AFAIK. It would be a good idea not to mes

Re: group nvram

2009-03-17 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/3/17 Marco d'Itri : > E.g. cp /bin/bash .; chgrp audio bash; chmod g+s bash I don't need to point out that this example doesn't make sense, do I? > The rest of the Linux world is: > http://dualstack.ipv6-exp.l.google.com/search?q=policykit . >From policykit page: PolicyKit is specifically

Re: Bug#513575: ITP: fswebcam -- Tiny and flexible webcam program

2009-01-31 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/1/31 Erik Schanze : > Have you already tried it? I tried to try it, it segfaults. It wouldn't be able to skip frames anyway. But this is not the main problem: > "dvgrab also supports UVC (USB Video Class) compliant DV devices using > Linux kernel module uvcvideo, which is a V4L2 driver.

Re: Bug#513575: ITP: fswebcam -- Tiny and flexible webcam program

2009-01-30 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/1/30 Erik Schanze : > What about dvgrab? > Not sure if it works for you, give it a try. Dvgrab is mainly for capturing video and audio data, and supports only DV and HDV formats, so it doesn't work with most of the webcams... Cheers, Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@

Re: Bug#513575: ITP: fswebcam -- Tiny and flexible webcam program

2009-01-30 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/1/30 Rodrigo Gallardo : > And, in any case, please do put (a summary of) that list in the > package's description. Your users will be most pleased. Does this look better? Fswebcam is a tiny and flexible webcam command-line program for capturing images from a V4L1/V4L2 device. It accepts a

Re: Bug#513575: ITP: fswebcam -- Tiny and flexible webcam program

2009-01-30 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/1/30 Julien Cristau : > how many of those do we need? why this one in particular? I've been looking in Debian for a command line tool that takes pictures from a USB video capture device that doesn't support MJPEG, and couldn't find one (besides mplayer - but in a really hackish way); fswebc

Bug#513575: ITP: fswebcam -- Tiny and flexible webcam program

2009-01-30 Thread Luca Niccoli
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Luca Niccoli -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: fswebcam Version : 20070108 Upstream Author : Philip Heron * URL : http://www.firestorm.cx/fswebcam/ * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang: C

Re: Debian -- the best

2008-12-19 Thread Luca Niccoli
2008/12/19 Michael Hanke : > > Dear Debian developers, As a debian user, I subscribe all of the above post. Thanks Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008-12-16 Thread Luca Niccoli
2008/12/16 Luca Niccoli : > I can't really see what I'm doing wrong... Maybe I have a clue: ++file_filter(const struct dirent *dir) ++{ ++ return (DT_REG == (DT_REG & dir->d_type)) || ++ (DT_LNK == (DT_LNK & dir->d_type)) ; ++} But I use XFS, which

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008-12-16 Thread Luca Niccoli
2008/12/17 Luca Niccoli : > But I use XFS, which seems to have some problems with d_type [1] > I'm not really sure this is the source of the problem, but I thought > it was worth giving a try... A second after posting I thought I could try mounting ~/.ssh on tmpfs for a test, and

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008-12-15 Thread Luca Niccoli
2008/12/16 Jens Peter Secher : > That is intentional to make it harder to tell the difference between > which users exist and which do not. (I know, it was just to point to the fact the pam-ssh is actually running) > Using option 'try_first_pass' does not make any difference when no > previous mo

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008-12-15 Thread Luca Niccoli
2008/12/13 Jens Peter Secher : > The package version is libpam-ssh_1.92-3 in experimental. I have > tested it extensively, but there is an awful number of ways to use the > module, so I might have missed something. Please help me and give it > some real-life testing. :-) Mmm, I don't know if I'

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008-12-04 Thread Luca Niccoli
2008/12/4 Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > To do that you will need to change /etc/pam.d/ssh-auth to > > auth sufficient pam_ssh.so I know, that's why I'm not complaining =) May writing it in the README.Debian could be a good idea. > Hmm, if noone else has access to the computer (includ

Re: For those who care about pam-ssh: RFC

2008-12-03 Thread Luca Niccoli
2008/12/3 Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Because of the security implications of changing a PAM module, I would > welcome some peer reviewing of the changes I have made. The new package > has been uploaded to experimental, and the NEWS.Debian is as follows. > Also, I would like comments

Bug#502959: general: raff.debian.org uses non-free software

2008-10-21 Thread Luca Niccoli
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > raff.debian.org uses a Compaq Smart 5i RAID card. A flash memory is used > to store the firmware. While the firmware is freely downloadable (as in > beer) on HP website [1], we don't have the corresponding source code.