Hi,
A couple months ago, I registered a pkg_wpa project at alioth with
the intent of moving wpasupplicant to a more collaborative packaging
effort, mostly due to lack of time on my part. I'd forgotten I'd done
this for a while, and then lost use of my laptop for a few months, so
wpasupplicant beca
rts without gratuitously duplicating
> efforts, and people who know the architectures to help the maintainers sort
> out bugs.
>
Easier access to the information would help this. Trawling the web
interface isn't my idea of fun, but if the fail logs for hppa hit my mailbox
I would be more
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 02:39:21PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> Sorry Kyle, I owe you an apology and $DRINK on my tab.
>
And I owe you an apology. As I later realized, and a few folks pointed
out, I was way beyond the line in my reply.
Sorry for being so harsh.
Regards,
Kyle M.
> You
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:20:40PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> kernel-latest-2.6-hppa 2.6.8-1
> source hppa unstable
> 1 month Kyle McMartin
>
> debian-kernel managed kernel-image tracker packages seem to be called
> kernel-image-$ver-$subarch (e.g. kernel-image-2.6-6
Due to a severe lack of time, I've decided to orphan a bunch of my
packages.
They are,
o hp48cc
o electric
o vipec
o libmad
o madplay
o libid3tag
I've filed bugs orphaning them, and have uploaded packages with the
maintainer set to QA.
Justificatio
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:06:19PM +, Rob Taylor wrote:
> Yes, that makes total sense. Would there likely be major objections to
> this?
>
Even less (likely zero) testing of packages by the maintainer before they
upload? This is definitely a serious problem...
Famous last words...
"Oh, I'll j
s. I will take them over
as per policy shortly. (They are relevant to me).
Thanks,
Kyle McMartin.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 08:34:57AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
>
X-Debbugs-CC: wouldn't kill people, would it?
For reference, this is #275935.
Regards,
Kyle McMartin.
rsonal
THERE IS NO CABAL!
--
Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1024D/191FCD8A - 331A 9468 C04D 3A76 5C56 BA68 7EB7 92DF 191F CD8A
2048R/F515317D - 68 A9 0D 28 1B DF 8D 42 0F CC AF 98 A8 D5 A4 04
.
>
Fair enough, though putting your secret key on a work machine
is a whole other can of worms.
Regards,
--
Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0x191FCD8A - 331A 9468 C04D 3A76 5C56 BA68 7EB7 92DF 191F CD8A [DSA]
new key and to retract the old key once the new key has
> made it into the Debian key ring.
>
Why are you replacing your key? Why can't you just add a subkey, or
another uid to your existing key? Alternatively, why can't you just
revuid or revkey the (uid/subkey)?
Regards,
--
Kyl
the
> iptuils Debian packages. I will maintain the racoon and libipsec
> packages, since I haven't seen any sign of other people offering to do
> so.
>
I wouldn't imagine so, I doubt anyone has gone to the trouble of porting
racoon to FreeS/WAN's implementation.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:57:39AM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Too late :/
>
Has kernel-patch-int been adopted? As one of the upstream authors I
would be glad to take it over.
Regards,
Kyle
--
Kyle McMartin
pgpkJ92sIv4YC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
tes for everything, etc.
An entire new game world is what is needed. Perhaps there are people in
the Free software community willing to begin a project to replicate the
Quake II data under the GPL?
- k
--
copyleft (c) 2001, Kyle McMartin
14 matches
Mail list logo
