On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:12:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > - hppa: one buildd, keeps up with package volume, but no backup buildd and > gdb seems to kill its kernel (yay); one porter machine.
The "gdb kills sarti" issue shouldn't be an issue once it's upgraded to sarge and running a kernel that actually works... The lack of backup buildd is simply because nobody has gone and set one up, it's not like we're lacking beefy hardware. Same with a porter machine. > The second most significant area of concern, for me, is having people being > proactive about dealing with per-architecture build failures. There's no > particular reason that should be the buildd admins' or the release team's > area of responsibility, either; all it requires is people who know what > they're doing to file sensible bug reports without gratuitously duplicating > efforts, and people who know the architectures to help the maintainers sort > out bugs. > Easier access to the information would help this. Trawling the web interface isn't my idea of fun, but if the fail logs for hppa hit my mailbox I would be more inclined to help... Regards, -- Kyle McMartin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
