the rationale behind two logos is that one is a "debian is cool" logo and
another is a "this is official debian" logo. they should look different
enough that you can tell whether someone is merely praising debian or
actually shipping it. i agree, though, that there should be no restriction
that the
dpkg -l file-rc
ii file-rc 0.4.3 Alternative one-configfile boot mechanism
i don't know if this is supposed to be the case or not, but contrary to
file-rc's documentation, scripts are not run in reverse order for shutting
down. is this a debian-specific thing or merely a bug? are
> Might it be possible to include fewer packages in each profile and then
> present the user with a list of additional packages that might be of
> interest to them given that they have chosen this particular profile?
> Something like "You have installed the Scientific Workstation profile. The
> fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
is the name debian a registered trademark?
if it is, wouldn't it be sensible to do the same for the logo?
- --p.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBNqt2MUJhnFR90XSjAQHeFAf9EULUklt0QfjI2DAbrPK2
> This means that we're willing to hold off on upgrades to all font packages
> until the relevant apt support for package renaming is ready.
>
> I just hope the rest of the world agrees that this is wise.
it's not. i'm new here, so i'm not sure if this is an old topoic or not, but
debian distribut
5 matches
Mail list logo
