On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:09:42PM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Alberto, hi all,
Hi Mike
>
> On Do 03 Jan 2013 19:18:27 CET alberto fuentes wrote:
>
> >Ubuntu has done some poor decisions but it has done some other that are
> >okay. We should consider merging some of them back.
> >Im thinkin
Hi Andrei
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:57:28PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 30 nov 12, 17:47:20, Harald Jenny wrote:
> >
> > Maybe some sort of mailing list could be dedicated to a discussion about
> > the actual usage of different init system so people may share
rhofer as he is the official
maintainer of openswan but thanks to upstream (especially Paul Wouters)
the next Debian package version will presumably include native upstart
and systemd support (not sure if also openrc).
Kind regards
Harald Jenny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@li
Hi Russ
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:04:52PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Please, let's *stop talking about this*, apart from the much more
> specific, straightforward, and *useful* discussion of what further work is
> required to enable those who wish to do so to run systemd as their init
> proc
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:12:14PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Harald,
Hi Adrian
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:58:35PM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> > I have tried systemd but as it does not support the Debian extensions to
> > cryptsetup (namely t
ecide how to deal with this matter.
Kind regards
Harald Jenny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20121129155835.gb2...@harald-has.a-little-linux-box.at
mostly
depends on the used features of the user... btw one of the most wanted
features of at least systemd is discussed here:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/169365.html
>
> --
> ciao,
> Marco
Kind regards
Harald Jenny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:08:24PM +0200, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 19:08, Harald Jenny wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:22:50PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > (Does anybody want to try removing net-tools and see what breaks?)
> > On my
s.
Kind regards
Harald Jenny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20120808170856.gc3...@harald-has.a-little-linux-box.at
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:23:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 29, Harald Jenny wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't this solve the whole dilemma in a policy compliant and easy
> > enough fashion that it could be used or what error is there in my idea?
> If fixing a real
node link and everybody is happy.
If both are installed the person is presented a debconf question which
allows him to choose which node* should be the one.
Wouldn't this solve the whole dilemma in a policy compliant and easy
enough fashion that it could be used or what error is there in my i
regards
Harald Jenny
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:07:09AM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 22:47 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >> As a consequence of these changes, the new Lintian release will cause
> >> many e
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:12:39PM -0500, James Vega wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Harald Jenny
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:11:28PM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> On 17/11/10 at 22:34 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> >> > Hello Lucas,
>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:11:28PM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 17/11/10 at 22:34 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> > Hello Lucas,
> >
> > concerning the openswan* packages:
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/openswan.log:
> >
>
or exit status 1
.
.
.
Errors were encountered while processing:
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
And here it's the already mentioned kernel issue, am I right?
Thanks very much for the valuable work you provide!
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:52:06PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 08:09 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 04:48:08PM -0700, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Harald Jenny wrote:
> > > >Could you give us a q
ore=$(unixdate)` | xargs git reset --hard
>
> # Make a pristine package.
> # --no-name/-n is important because it won't save the timestamp in the
> # 5th to 8th byte of the gzip.
> cd cjk-$(upstream_version) && git archive --format=tar
> --prefix=cjk-$(ups
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 06:57:52AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Harald Jenny (har...@a-little-linux-box.at):
>
> > Well the patch is dated in 2008, so yes, people should have been quicker
> > voting and working for this feature.
>
>
> And this is a gr
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 05:49:43PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Harald Jenny (har...@a-little-linux-box.at):
> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:15:01AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Am 01.11.2010 13:51, schrieb Chr
is patch?
Patch does not apply cleanly to netcfg's newest version (at least not for me)
- currently working on a new patch and a wpa_supplicant udeb (just for testing
right now). "Testing" will be done on amd64 with WPA2-PSK and hidden ssid.
>
>
> Best regards,
> A
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 04:48:08PM -0700, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Harald Jenny wrote:
>
> >sorry to disturb you but it seems like a month has passed and the situation
> >is
> >still unclear.
>
> 'Tis now on the correct track, finally.
Hello Richard A Nelson,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:30:59PM +, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> On 09/27/2010 10:14 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:33:05PM +0200, Harald Jenny wrote:
> >> I'm sorry for disturbing all of you but I'
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:40:36AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Harald,
Hi Holger
>
> On Dienstag, 28. September 2010, Harald Jenny wrote:
> > > you don't need to wait for any specific authorization to
> > > prepare an NMU.
> > Well I personally find
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:30:59PM +, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> On 09/27/2010 10:14 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:33:05PM +0200, Harald Jenny wrote:
> >> I'm sorry for disturbing all of you but I'm currently facing the problem
&
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:14:45AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ adding MIA to Cc, for further inquiries, and the maintainer himself ]
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:33:05PM +0200, Harald Jenny wrote:
> > I'm sorry for disturbing all of you but I'm currently fac
Please if anybody is in contact
with him try to convince him that an update of this package is really needed.
If there is no response from him I must contact the release team and ask if
they would be willing to accept an NMU as the bug in libmilter bites a lot of
other software.
Thanks for your h
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 09:51:38AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Harald Jenny, le Fri 09 Jul 2010 23:41:45 +0200, a écrit :
> >> I'm maintaining the amavisd-milter package and have a question: Due to the
&
s for temporary limiting the architectures so that the build system
needs not to use it's precious ressources for unsuccessful build attempts? I'm
not on the list so if you answer please CC me so that I also receive your mail.
Thanks in advance for your help
Kind regards
Harald Jenny
--
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Harald Jenny
Owner: Harald Jenny
* Package name: aeromail
Version : 2.80
Upstream Author : Dion Nicolaas
* URL : http://www.nicolaas.net/aeromail/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : PHP
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Harald Jenny
Owner: Harald Jenny
* Package name: amavisd-milter
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Petr Rehor
* URL : http://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : New
30 matches
Mail list logo
