Hello, testing with the version from experimental yielded the following additional messages compared to unstable (all overrides were correctly detected).
W: openswan-doc: spelling-error-in-readme-debian allows to allows one to W: openswan-modules-source: spelling-error-in-readme-debian allows to allows one to W: openswan: spelling-error-in-readme-debian allows to allows one to I: openswan: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/ipsec/pluto ouput output W: openswan-modules-dkms: spelling-error-in-readme-debian allows to allows one to Btw. packages tested were openswan and amavisd-milter. Kind regards Harald Jenny On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:07:09AM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 22:47 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> As a consequence of these changes, the new Lintian release will cause > >> many existing overrides to no longer apply. We recognise that this will > >> lead to some noise in the short term but are convinced that the longer > >> term advantages make this worthwhile. > >> > > Did you do an archive check with the new lintian and diff'ed it against > > a check with previous lintian? > > No, we haven't. > > An archive check is running as I type, that's the easy part. However, the > results need to be checked, and even though Niels already volunteered to > take a look, I expect the diff to be quite big. > > More eyes, and hands, are welcome; installing the RC and starting with one's > packages would be great. > > Cheers, > -- > Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer > www.debian.org - get.debian.net > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ikb8fe$7qh$2...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110227193850.ga3...@harald-has.a-little-linux-box.at
