Hi,
Is there any good documentation about best practices for OpenPGP key
management? I plan to use gnupg (gpg), as it's conventional and seems like
the "best of breed" these days.
Most documentation I've found seems significantly out of date (including
long discussions of incompatibilities with ve
Hi,
I'm off on two trips.
One across Saskatchewan (Trans Canada, and parts south), from one side
of the province to the other.
The other to Cincinnati, OH via Minneapolis, MN Airport.
Email me for details (I'm not subscribed to debian-devel).
I may not be able to use my existing key (forgot th
In response to several issues raised...
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=191105
Not having updated signatures is not an issue that should keep snort out
of stable as administrators may write their own signatures for snort.
Perhaps however a wishlist bug asking for a comment
The last time I posted my unofficial release issues status I received
several requests to change the formatting, and so I have. I plan to find a
site to host this html document (preferably alioth), but I haven't ironed
out the details yet. It should also be strongly noted that this is an
unofficial
Is connecting files to packages like this part of cruft? A potential
wishlist item for cruft?
Drew Daniels
I've been meaning to write this for a while. I wrote up a procecure and I
may have even posted it. I include files indicated by cruft in my backups.
I'm also looking at checking md5sums and atimes to help decide if backups
of files like conf files is neccisary or if they're just the defaults from
t
I didn't have much of a chance to update this report to be accurate to
more than from a few days ago, but here it is as I'll likely be busy for
the next few days. I'll try to post another message updating this stuff
again next month. Note I haven't included the latest apt translation
announcement o
There are many questions and comments about how the security team, RM and
others handle security bugs. Some change is desired by at least several
people. I've already started trying to help clean up security bugs. I
won't even bother volunteering for the security team until I've had my
identity ver
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:39:46PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels écrivait:
> > page). What happened to the qa MIA database? The code's at
> > http://cvs.debian.org/mia/?cvsroot=qa but I can't find anything online.
>
> The
First off, great work! Now I can remove the retirement item off my
old "todo" list. [1]
On Tue, 13 May 2003, James Troup wrote:
> On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
> inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
> looking first at all maintainer
I'm glad to see this service.
The Developer's Reference lists
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ as being a place to
co-ordinate the sponsoring of packages. Currently it's unavailable to me
(down?). Other problems I have with it include: no place to upload
packages and it's for "
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:57:25 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:07, Rdiger Kuhlmann wrote:
> > d) the libel published in the Debian Weekly News of 2003-02-18; cf
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200302/msg01391.html
> >
> > .. none of those can be fix
I'd like to see a place where the status of all the various places where
potential Sarge release issues are tracked. I feel that
http://www.debian.org/devel/testing was missing things, and I didn't see
anything else like this. Following the debian-devel convention, I created
something myself.
I ma
I don't quite understand all the concepts being discussed but the
following web pages may be worth reading.
http://master.debian.org/~brinkmd/arch-handling.txt
http://lists.debian.org/debian-win32/2003/debian-win32-200302/msg00018.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2002/debian-bsd-200202/msg00
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > We're not _removing_ anything, we're providing an integrated system.
>
> in this cotext, it seems that upstream galeon _includes_ those
> bookmarks (redhat, slackware, et al). to _remove_ those bookmarks is a
> _remov
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
>
> When I run command "vrms" in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free
> packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers. How about you? I like to
>
There may be patent issues. I'd check with the authors of the archivers.
Additionally reading the
16 matches
Mail list logo
