On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:42:54AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Marco writes:
> > Look like there is consensus to move mutt-i to main. In the next days I
> > will upload it along with some fixes.
>
> Do you think we should check with ME first? While I don't believe he is at
> any risk of pr
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 08:38:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Steve Greenland writes:
> > While I agree in principle, you might want to ask Michael Elkins first;
> > it's conceivable that he could be brought into any litigation
>
> I didn't realize that the author of mutt-i was a US residen
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 09:49:22PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dan> See, it's not "Is anyone going to?" or "Do we agree we
> Dan> should?" righ
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:56:56PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dan> See, it's not "Is anyone going to?" or "Do we agree we
> Dan> should?" righ
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 10:05:09PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> Nobody has moved on getting libstdc++2.8 back in slink, even without
> a -dev.
>
> Is anyone going to do this?
>
> Ben
See, it's not "Is anyone going to?" or "Do we agree we should?" right
now. It's "does anyone but Dan have the
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:15:51AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
>
> Brian
> ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
PowerPC ha
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 08:01:42PM -0500, Justin A. McCright wrote:
> Is anyone going to try and get a version of this that works with newer
> Apaches out before the freeze?
I'm working on it. It's very broken at the moment!
Dan
> Le Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 02:31:40AM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... écrivait:
> > I do worry about what this might break as well. Another option would be
> > to have /usr/lib/perl5/debian(/$arch)? be the first element of @INC and
> > leave /usr/lib/perl5/$version(/$arch)? there with only the Per
On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 01:34:42AM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
> >I know what's going on with IPC, and I'm guessing the DBM test is failing
> >because of a bug in the libc.
>
> So, what's going on with IPC?
IPC until very recently was completely hosed on powerpc. We have hopes
that a
On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 09:34:46AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Depends what image you want for the system. The HHGTTG was good,
> but I don't think it is worth naming the releases after it.
> I prefer the penguins.
>
> BTW, wasn't it "Slartibartfast", one word?
Another vote for penguins. Spea
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 05:27:23PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> I study law. And I can tell you that there´s not a problem with the GPL
> licence in the KDE project. Even if the GPL (read very narrowly and literally)
> prohibited the use of QT, every judge/lawyer would reinterpret this l
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 05:19:51PM -0700, Darren Stalder wrote:
> Matt McLean, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
> >this is necessary since the semun union is no longer in the libc. its been
> >awhile since your last perl upload, and newer versions have come out.. are
> >you still alive
The problem with roadrunner is this:
They explicitly disallow all servers of ANY kind. No open ports,
except maybe identd.
A friend of mine was running one just fine under linux, with dhcp and
all, but got his account terminated for having sendmail up :)
So be careful.
Dan
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Or at least offer an xterm-cons or xterm-black-bg. Also, could someone PLEASE
figure out
the remaining options to make xterm behave graphically like a console?
I can't get the combination of bold and 16 colors to work correctly.
Dan
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 05:43:54PM -0500, Alexander E. Apke w
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 08:09:51PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> Actually the true killer was the upgrade of the teTeX packages. It is
> pretty hard to stand seeing three time in a row "Running initex [...]
> This will take some time" on a 486DX-2/66 at the configuration stage.
> This alone consumed
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 12:38:19PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I think that not only should bugs be marked by the
> > distributions they exist in, they should also be classified by
> > architecture;
>
> Actually, I think we can do the same way more
Will do, then. This leaves me one big question, though. This is going
to require mixing four things:
(A) apache 1.3.0
(B) netgod's massive apache diff
(C) mod_perl upstream -- probably going to version it by date and use
the CVS tree instead of the rarer new releases.
(D) My own diff for this pro
Since the dynamic version of mod_perl is quite broken right now (I
believe Jules advised the perl maintainer of the problems; loading
dynamic shared objects from another DSO reults in a few undeclared
symbols from libperl.a - I'm guessing somehow the lowest level module
can't see them, and don't kn
ge is almost ready.
Source: libapache-mod-perl
Section: main/web
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Dan Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Standards-Version: 2.4.1
Package: libapache-mod-perl
Architecture: i386
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, apache (>= 1.3.0), perl
Description: Integration of perl w
On Mon, Jun 15, 1998 at 12:34:38PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Andreas Jellinghaus writes:
> > what then ?
> > joe.
>
> Well, that's IMHO an idea worth worth studying. When I first
> installed Linux, I was coming from DOS and Borland's editors, which
> joe mimics quite closely.
And joe, like a
Now, don't get me wrong...I hate windows registries just as badly as
anyone else, and I've been using linuxconf on and off for ages. But
this has one darn good idea to it: many programs using the same data
source. For instance, I just installed this machine with one hostname
before realizing that
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 12:28:24PM -0400, LeRoy D. Cressy wrote:
> Where or what is your /dev/hdb drive? Is your hdb drive your
> cdrom? If so, it should be detected. I don't know if the
> cdrom has been compiled as a module, if so they must be loaded from the
> drivers
> disk.
hdb is my cdr
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 09:55:57AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
>
> Not yet. A few questions: Which filesystem type has hdc1? Which version of the
> boot-floppies were you using? I assume hdc2 and hdc3 were properly detected
> in previous steps (initialize swap & initialize linux partition), righ
I ran through my first x86 install today, and had a wierd problem.
After pounding my bios into properly detect both c and d drives, I
started the install using loadlin planning to avoid floppies
altogether. However, when the time came to select a partition to find
the resc1440.bin for drivers, it
24 matches
Mail list logo
