[follow-ups should probably go to -project; this issue is non-technical]
Hi Andreas,
Thank you for your prompt follow-up.
At 2025-05-08T10:14:57+0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Thu, May 08, 2025 at 02:54:47AM -0500 schrieb G. Branden Robinson:
> > At 2025-05-08T09:07:48+0200, Andr
At 2025-05-08T09:07:48+0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I don't believe the DPL should initiate GRs. I also think that when
> this GR does happen (and I'm confident it will), someone else will be
> DPL.
In future DPL campaigns, I encourage the electorate to insist that each
candidate disclose which po
At 2025-04-21T14:50:40+0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Also, while the idea of Josh might sound good in theory (adding
> dependencies will not harm anybody, we just want to see the
> dependencies explicit),
While I support that proposal and initiative...
> it might create some undeserved pressure on
Hi Josh (it's been a long time since XFree86 packaging days!),
At 2025-04-21T01:42:52+0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > "You must not tag any packages essential before this has been
> > discussed on the debian-devel mailing list and a consensus
Hi Adrian,
At 2025-04-21T01:34:56+0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 04:46:52PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Factual statements about one's run-time dependencies should be as
> > decoupled from the details of the set of "Essential" packages a
At 2025-04-20T23:22:04+0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 06:25:53PM +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > What I'm suggesting here is that if every individual package that
> > needs awk has a Depends on it (via a package that allows switching
> > implementations), rather than rel
At 2025-04-04T00:46:03+0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> PS: I never understood why there's both w and who, and why they are
> different implementations.
As I understand it, it's the same reason as why more(1) vs. pg(1) and
why lp(1) vs. lpd(1)--the AT&T/USG/USL vs. BSD schism.
who(1) goes all th
[Summary: Let's permit ourselves to evolve, collectively _and_
individually, instead of seeking a winning workflow to freeze.]
Hi Otto,
At 2025-03-22T20:36:32-0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > > Just out of curiosity, what email client and plugins do you use to
> > > achieve your optimal email-bas
At 2025-03-22T16:15:23-0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what email client and plugins do you use to
> achieve your optimal email-based workflow?
I don't see where Wookey made a claim that his workflow was "optimal",
merely that it was effective for him personally. Debian Deve
At 2025-03-09T19:32:32+0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sun 09 Mar 2025 at 12:17pm +01, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Sean Whitton writes:
> >> The docs are public: https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/manpages
> > Those are helpful even for me as uploading packages to NEW! I wish
> > I had read them bef
Hi Ted,
I disagree with your application of some points to the Debian Project.
I agree with others.
(Why is this in -devel and not -project?)
At 2025-02-08T23:09:55-0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> So for example, if you serve on the board of a church, or a non-profit
> orgaization like Usenix, or t
[M-F-T set to -project; see https://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html ]
At 2025-02-07T17:08:44+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> I'm not sure I'd expect more from people than them saying who they
> work for or defend.
>
> I'd not, eg, expect some Canonical employee to refrain voting a GR
> because th
At 2025-02-07T09:32:35-, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2025-02-07, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Does that mean we should equip ourselves with a Conflict of Interest
> > Policy? Here is a suggestion drafted by ChatGPT.
>
> I'm not sure why I should spend time reading something you didn't
> bother wri
At 2025-01-27T12:27:12+0100, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian GNU|Linux) wrote:
> as for the original subject of this thread: what's actually wrong with
> 'debian/main' instead of 'debian/latest'? i personally do not really
> care, and can live with whatever is decided.
I'd point out that "debian/main"
Hi Jonathan,
At 2025-01-15T22:01:28+, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed Jan 15, 2025 at 9:42 PM GMT, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > As someone who has a bit of a preoccupation with man pages
>
> You've reminded me that you presented 'Write the Fine Manual' i
At 2025-01-15T14:09:03-0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "G" == G Branden Robinson writes:
> G> Don't we have dpkg filters for this sort of use case?
>
> I honestly can't tell from your message which position you are
> supporting, which I
At 2025-01-15T12:45:22-0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Marvin> I have on a number of occasions used these man pages, and
> Marvin> having them installed locally is very helpful. I would
> Marvin> rather have the man pages installed without the additional
> Marvin> documentation in libpa
At 2025-01-15T20:25:04+0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2025, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> >Quoting Thorsten Glaser (2025-01-15 00:50:55)
> >> There should be something in this that says that they need to do so
> >> in a way that matches ftpmaster policies.
> >
> >Do we re
Hi Helmut,
I have a general remark and a technical one.
At 2025-01-08T15:21:42+0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I have bad news about /usr-move. The primary mitigation (M18) for
> aliased diversions (P3) as implemented by me in quite a few packages
> is broken.
[...]
> If your have a lot of time and
Hi nick (and Marc),
At 2024-12-01T18:43:28-0500, nick black wrote:
> Gioele Barabucci left as an exercise for the reader:
> > You may have misunderstood that phrase. I was not referring to the
> > fact that there are no standardized normalization forms for Unicode
> > (I explicitly mention Annex 1
At 2024-12-02T09:38:28+0800, kindusmith wrote:
> 1. First, root and ordinary users will not be able to use commands in
> each other's directories, which will greatly increase their security
>
> 2. If /usr is partitioned separately instead of a unified / partition,
> ordinary users can also use com
At 2024-11-10T11:21:43+, Richard Lewis wrote:
> > The tone can change: http://paste.debian.net/1335055/
> > LLMs are being improved rapidly over time.
> >
> > I guess it's due to some potential safety issues so that LLM uses a
> > dull corporate tone by default.
>
> I think it's slightly misdi
At 2024-11-09T14:46:45-0800, Mo Zhou wrote:
> The tone can change: http://paste.debian.net/1335055/
I recognize a different style there...
> LLMs are being improved rapidly over time.
...but I'm not sure I would call the new example an improvement. With
all those exclamation marks it seems more
At 2024-11-09T21:44:40+, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Please, no further. We don't need hallucinated summaries on our
> lists. If you want to publish them, publish them somewhere separately
> IMHO.
Oh, good--since it's not a CoC violation to express an unflattering
opinion of this experiment, did a
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024, 12:43 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 10:26 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Mon Oct 7, 2024 at 8:58 AM BST, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > P.S.: Isnt it about time to rename exim4 to exim?
> >
> > Or apache2 to apache?
>
> The ASF is responsible for a lot more tha
Hi Jonas,
At 2024-09-07T08:37:45+0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting G. Branden Robinson (2024-09-07 05:47:17)
> > On a less sarcastic note, I am taken aback by the fact that this
> > project can have a ~100 message thread proposing a DEP
> >
> > "Enable true
At 2024-09-06T16:30:44+, Ceppo wrote:
> I see that Salsa requires reCAPTCHA resolution to sign up, and it also
> embeds reCAPTCHA code in most or all pages - or at least so it looks
> to me as an absolute Javascript ignorant.
>
> I feel it's a contradiction that Debian relies on a non-free serv
At 2024-08-15T13:20:02-0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > This change was noted in NEWS.
> >
> > I would suggest hooking your config into something that uses the
> > network-online.target target, with a timeout like network-manager
> > and networkd do, so that the boot process doesn't hang. If it's a
At 2024-04-11T15:37:46+0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:26:55AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > Or, because some upstream maintainers have learned through, long,
> > bitter experience that newer versions of autoconf tools may result
> > in the generated configure script to be
At 2024-03-31T22:32:49+, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Upstreams would probably prefer that we used git repositories
> *directly* as source artifacts, but that comes with a whole other can
> of worms...
Speaking from my upstream groff perspective, I wouldn't _prefer_ that.
The distribution archives
Hi Otto,
At 2024-03-30T14:09:46-0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> While reviewing xz-utils commits I noticed that a bunch of old
> copyright holder names were removed in
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xz-utils/-/commit/d1b67558cbc06c449a0ae7b7c1694e277aef4a78.
>
> Is this OK to do so?
My opinion
At 2024-03-30T14:38:03+0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2024/03/30 11:05, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > > 1. Move towards allowing, and then favoring, git-tags over source tarballs
> >
> > Some people have suggested this before -- and I have considered
> > adopting that approach myself, but one thing
package libghc-pandoc-dev
tag 1053777 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi Jonas!
At 2024-01-31T08:43:18+0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting G. Branden Robinson (2024-01-31 05:49:00)
> > Well, the version of pandoc that resolved the issue was 3.1.7,
> > released in August 2023.[1] But
Hi Loren,
At 2024-01-30T19:55:07-0800, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> While building a package preparing for a possible upload, I am getting
> a large number of warnings from groff-message due to invalid fonts for
> C and CB in the manpages that are generated from Markdown with pandoc.
> From what I under
[follow-ups should probably go to -project, but I'm not setting my
headers to try to force that]
At 2024-01-24T16:57:06+0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> One could equally well make the argument that distributors should care
> about the Go/Rust ecosystems, and make whatever changes needed in
> order
At 2023-11-15T14:58:15+, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> I replied to you there too, but you still never seemed to be able to
> explain... why do you need to put an OpenPGP key on the service
> you're using to upload Python packages (not Debian packages) to
> PyPI, given that PyPI doesn't support uploa
Hi Jon,
At 2023-10-23T17:24:30-0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> When I wrote the article (last week) it was a lot closer :)
>
> As for why: Debian may have resolved this, for now at least, but this
> is an issue that is sure to crop up in distributions that are not as
> quick to pick up new groff r
At 2023-10-23T11:17:07-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Would someone be willing to send me a subscriber-sponsored link to it?
Thanks to the three fleet-fingered folks who supplied me with one. I am
amply equipped to resume my crusade against ignorance and
misinformation...except...
Now t
At 2023-10-14T20:51:27-0600, Antonio Russo wrote:
> I discovered a new pet peeve today:
I must report with some dismay that this thread made LWN.
https://lwn.net/Articles/947941/
Would someone be willing to send me a subscriber-sponsored link to it?
I intend to attempt to address what I expect
Hi Andrew,
At 2023-10-23T10:41:10+1300, Andrew Ruthven wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-10-22 at 13:18 +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > fixed the problem. It is strange this option seems to be affected by
> > the keyboard settings in gnome settings, however i changed all
> > options back and forth in the GU
At 2023-10-15T13:11:47-0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Sorry for my original message, which was very poorly worded and
> probably incredibly confusing. Let me try to make less of a hash of
> it. I think what I'm proposing is something like:
My reply to this didn't make it to the -devel list even aft
Hi Russ,
At 2023-10-15T12:06:14-0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Minor point, but since you posted it
No worries!
> "G. Branden Robinson" writes:
>
> > ...
>
> > \- Minus sign or basic Latin hyphen‐minus. \- produces the
> > Uni
At 2023-10-15T10:01:20-0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think my position at this point as pod2man maintainer (not yet
> implemented in podlators) is that every occurrence of - in POD source
> will be translated into \-, rather than using the current heuristics,
> and people who meant to use ‐ should
Hi Wookey,
At 2023-10-15T16:08:32+0100, Wookey wrote:
> OK. So I read all that, and learned a whole load of stuff I was quite
> happy not knowing about.
>
> However despite reading it all, and especially this bit:
> > Whenever I've maintained man pages in roff I tend to be precise in
> > the usag
At 2023-10-14T20:51:27-0600, Antonio Russo wrote:
> I discovered a new pet peeve today: if you search for a command in a
> manual page, say -e in man 1 zgrep, it's a crapshot whether just
> searching for '-e' will find the command or not. The reason is that
> "-" may been accidentally encoded as ‐
At 2023-09-22T02:11:15-0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> SPDX defines an xml format only. They lost before they'd even
> started.
>
> debian/copyright is supposed to be human-readable first and foremost.
> XML need not apply.
Very much +1 on everything quoted.
That said, SPDX's license list and the
At 2023-09-10T21:47:36+0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Quoting Bill Allombert (2023-09-10 18:29:36)
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 09:00:22AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> > > >> Hmm, how about providing license-common package and that
> > > >> depends
At 2023-08-23T15:40:06+0100, Adam Sampson wrote:
> "Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
> > where are we going to get our fortunes from - where's the canonical
> > source now that FreeBSD has gone?
>
> There is Shlomi Fish's version:
> https://github.com/shlomif/fortune-mod/
I've been mulling over whet
in solidarity with striking garbage workers.
At 2023-08-18T21:09:11+, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> As the person who raised this on debian-project in November 2022 - see
> the archives for debian-project for November/December 2022
[...]
> There was unfortunately no consensus on remo
At 2023-08-17T01:37:52+0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 07:08:18PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [6] https://man.cx/grog
> >
> > I was going to link to
> > https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/groff/grof.1.en.html here, but
>
Hi Hugh,
At 2023-08-17T07:54:03+1000, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 03:39, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> > > This all seems promising. Unfortunately, the man page is
> > > hand-crafted, not generated from another source, so
Hi Hugh,
I work on groff upstream.
At 2023-08-15T22:46:30+1000, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> groff-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor
> failed, or it or soelim was not run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE
> macro called with TW register undefined)
>
> It seems TW is not defined in the num
At 2023-07-21T13:43:05+0200, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> On 7/21/23 12:57, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > But I see no mechanism for interacting with autopkgtests to force
> > them to re-run due to the remedy of a defect in the test harne
Hi folks,
Regarding:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/groff
...progress of groff into testing is blocked because autopkgtests went
bonkers, failing on every architecture. This was due to a change in a
groff diagnostic message not getting scraped away by dgit, which was
using a regex to match the
At 2023-05-19T15:32:40+0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I occasionally use 32-bit x86 even today (mostly for not very good
> historical reasons, but nevertheless), and I do it by using a 32-bit
> container on a 64-bit x86 machine instead. It's much faster to run,
> and it doesn't depend on installer su
At 2023-05-19T15:03:40+0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Luca Boccassi wrote:
> >+1 for stopping publishing installers for i386, it has been mentioned
> >many times but it's always worth repeating: electricity costs to keep
> >running i386 hardware are already way higher than what it costs to
> >buy a
At 2023-05-17T11:30:36+0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> This bootstrap aspect got me and I discussed this with a number of
> people and did some research.
I'd like to nominate you for a Russ Allbery Award for the most useful
post to the thread. Your attention to concrete, empirical details,
arising n
[I am not subscribed to debian-gcc or c-std-porting]
Hi Florian,
At 2023-04-18T16:07:45+0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> TL;DR: I want to propose a GCC 14 change which will impact
> distributions, so I'd like to gather some feedback from Debian.
>
> Clang has disabled support for a few historic C f
At 2023-03-26T13:56:55-0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sat 04 Mar 2023 at 10:58PM +01, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > But git or svn or even sccs and rcs is NOT, in any way, preferred
> > for of modification. Only one way of storage and handling some
> > metadata.
>
> This is Debian's official position,
At 2023-02-26T11:52:39+0100, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Just import them? Do you have any specific questions or problems with
> this?
[...]
> Again, which advice? You said that it works for you.
Hi Andrey,
I think at least some of my confusion arose from trying to use gbp with
a git-dpm-based r
I expect.
Meanwhile I reckon I'll start praying to the gods of backports and point
releases.
Regards,
Branden
[1] https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html#soft
[2]
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/tree/ANNOUNCE?id=99e5b4ae55a7c222f6bf57b355289a88d862478d
https://git.sava
(git log -r HEAD~21..HEAD).
commit 3cff7c6967e89d187efb160ce7d2a09af5ea82aa (HEAD -> master)
Author: G. Branden Robinson
Date: Sat Feb 25 22:53:06 2023 -0600
debian/changelog: Add upstream bug closers.
commit 1fd80f4151713e9f1d3cb52a4b749fa643776908
Author: G. Branden Robinson
Date: Sa
Hi folks,
It's been a while since I've done any packaging. I was baffled when
presented with the following.
dh_clean
cp: cannot stat
'debian/.debhelper/bucket/files/19c12bb2ca19e68724c2854ed0512469518df19b0710cc2011a5ca540810979c':
No such file or directory
dh_clean: error: cp -an --reflink
At 2019-06-01T09:04:39+0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Are we then looking more closely at AMD-based machines given that
> those had less problems around speculative attacks?
To borrow a phrase from Christopher Hitchens, this comment gives a
hostage to fortune.
My team at work closely follows (and pa
[You didn't honor my M-F-T so I guess this will continue to go to both
lists.]
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:29:29PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I believe your reasoning is faulty, because it is based on incomplete
> >
ot be
recommending as a best practice licensing provisions which are legally void
significant jurisdictions like the United States.)
(Why isn't this in -legal? Followups set.)
[1] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>#1/1
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc/msg/0946381
ow, it is only 314
> > lines of code, 153 of which are lists of FC2 packages, so it doesn't
> > seem likely to share any common ancestry with debootstrap.
>
> I have just been given permission to post the original internal tool
> used at Progeny which rpmstrap is based upon,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 06:56:56PM +0200, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Le lundi 29 août 2005 à 11:42 -0500, Branden Robinson / Debian Project
> Leader a écrit :
> > Eh? What exactly did I say?
>
> wiggy: if anyone from d-a is responding to any of the offers
> they're get
" people would be nice ?
Yes, I'd love to see such a report myself. :)
> > Also DSA does not have anything to do with ftpmaster work. The
> > ftpmaster people organise themselves on their own.
Well, in theory, when a task crosses a lane of responsibility from
ftpmaster to DSA and
een.
In my opinion, DFSG 4 somewhat clumsily lumps together two related but
distinguishable issues -- one is a presentation format for distribution,
the other is a means for the work to identify itself.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Religious bondage shackles and
Debian GNU/Linux
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:45:52PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 25 avril 2005 à 01:03 -0500, Branden Robinson / Debian Project
> Leader a écrit :
> > Woody Security Update Challenges and Progress
> > -
> > The ARM
ected. So here are source packages grouped by maintainer.
> Data is from /var/lib/apt/lists/*_Packages on an i386 sid box.
[...]
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> twofish
Go ahead and file a bug for this one, please -- twofish sees so little
activity that I'm likely t
he buildd admins on
this via IRC, but it is good to give this cleanup procedure broader
exposure.
[1] also available at http://redwald.deadbeast.net/tmp/xfree86-common_postrm_buildd_fix.diff >
--
G. Branden Robinson| The software said it requir
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 07:13:57PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Branden Robinson told me that he does changelog editing of past
> revisions continuously for X, for reasons of being able to correctly
> lookup when a certain bug was fixed. Especially typo's in bugnumber for
testing or unstable, please bookmark the
following site:
http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xsf/XFree86/NEWS.xhtml
--
G. Branden Robinson| The greatest productive force is
Debian GNU/Linux | human selfishness.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Robert
rt are
intended by this message. It is meant only to advise you as to how to
communicate more harmoniously with people involved with the Debian Project.
Thank you for your patience with this form letter, for your respect for the
Debian Project's mailing list conventions, and for your partici
er all, if I can't persuade the users of those MUAs that honoring
people's wishes is a good idea, I don't suspect I'll make much more headway
with anyone else.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | If ignorance
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:57:24AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Branden Robinson
>
> | On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 12:06:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | > environment variables, at least, are trivial to accomplish using the
> | > pam_env module. Properly setting a
al
mail. If you can discuss this subject without indulging yourself in
straw-man attacks like this, please follow-up with a more reasonable
message.
And, by the way:
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
Please get an MUA that respects Mail-Copies-To:.
--
G. Brand
erson?
I somehow suspect that umasks predate environment variables in the misty
early history of Unix, else the umask would've been made one.
--
G. Branden Robinson| The Bible is probably the most
Debian GNU/Linux | genocidal book ever written.
[E
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:14:58AM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> >/etc/login.defs explicitly indicates that it is "Configuration
> >control definitions for the login package", and many of its
> >parameters are inapplicable to display manager
umask is not an environment
variable.)
* What's the path of least resistance?
* What would violate user expectations the least?
* What would be a good ideal approach, if code changes weren't an issue?
--
G. Branden Robinson| You could wire up a dead rat to a
Debia
/Articles/97469/
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265546
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=270060
--
G. Branden Robinson| If you want your name spelled
Debian GNU/Linux | wrong, die.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t; for other existing knowledge bases.
Enrico,
Casting "Eray Summoning IX" is prohibited in Debian and is a bannable
offense. :-P
Quick, everyone, scoot your feet across his thaumaturgic circle before he
finishes his spell...
--
G. Branden Robinson| Never underestima
, why aren't the assistant release managers mentioned on Debian's
organization page?
[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
[2] http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
--
G. Branden Robinson| A fun
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:31:42AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:12:21AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
> > I think you trimmed away content that was crucial for understanding the
> > par
s liked licking the creamy center out of oreads before ingesting
the crunchy carapace.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Organized religion is a sham and a
Debian GNU/Linux | crutch for weak-minded people who
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | need st
t we (the U.S.) didn't even *have*
federal currency until the 20th century.
Historical revisionism has never been more successfully practiced than
by Christians and capitalists in the United States during the 20th
century.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Eternal vigilance i
ong with many others are looking forward to seeing John Ashcroft being
> kicked out.
/me rises from the pew and says "Amen!"
See? I can be religious.
--
G. Branden Robinson| What influenced me to atheism was
Debian GNU/Linux | readi
and stop trolling now?
Oh, is *that* who Tom Ballard is? I'd heard about this guy.
Stuff is starting to fall into place now.
--
G. Branden Robinson|If you wish to strive for peace of
Debian GNU/Linux |soul, then believe; if you w
|| |\ |
\|\___/|/ \_/\_/ |___|_| \_|
Bah, but you probably did that on purpose, invoking the Deliberate
Invocation Corollary.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Good judgement comes from
Debian GNU/Linux | experience; experience comes from
[EMAIL PROTECTE
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:33:48PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:24:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> | > Demons are evil,
> |
> | Demons don't exist. Consequently, their moral value is undefinable.
t. You only believe it.
You've rejected both inductive and deductive arguments, so I think it's
clear that you will accept no path to the stated conclusion.
You're welcome to your dogmatism, but don't be surprised if no one else
cares to share it.
--
G. Brand
better Christian
than those who object to my proposed naming scheme! Tee-hee.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Fair use is irrelevant and
Debian GNU/Linux |improper.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-- Asst. U.S. Attorney Scott
http://people.
ve known some quite nice people who had parochial fundamentalist
beliefs, and who didn't let their conviction that I was going to Hell
prevent them from cultivating a friendship with me.
I try to fight meme wars on designated meme battlefiends, like public
discussion foru
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:17:03AM -0800, Nunya wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:31:53AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:23:39PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:12:56PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > > Because
´t have expected that getting polemic is a necessary to
> become DPL... :-//
Yeah; thankfully we don't have to put up with that sort of thing since
Branden Robinson wasn't elected DPL[1].
[1] If you need this sentence explained to you, please email me
privately. :)
--
G. Bran
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:08:44AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:54:09AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > No, it's probably antipathy for the Free Software Foundation driving
> > this more than anything else.
> >
&g
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:12:21AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I think you didn't bother to read any of the parts of my message that
> > you didn't quote.
>
> I did. But I trimmed away those that were
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Paul Baker wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2003, at 3:27 PM, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >Thus:
> >
> >Debian FreeBSD -> Debian Forneus (BSD)
> >Debian NetBSD -> Debian
1 - 100 of 708 matches
Mail list logo
