Package: general
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Created new account using the GNOME account manager in "settings".
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
Package: general
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Created new user from a non-root account (using root password prompt within
non-root account).
Started that new user.
Tried to read
amd64
arches.
Thanks for your help in advance.
BR,
Björn Esser
[1] people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi there!
I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until now.
BR,
Björn.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Björn Esser"
* Package name: scummvm-tools
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Author : ScummVM team
* URL : http://www.scummvm.org/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : A collection of various
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
So how shall I name it then?
Any suggestions?
BR,
Björn Esser
Am 06.12.2011 09:06, schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Miles Bader writes:
>
>> "libyastui" would seem sort of misleading -- from the
>> description, it sounds li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Björn Esser"
* Package name: libyui
Version : 2.21.1
Upstream Authors:
Stefan Hundhammer
Michael Andres
Stephan Kulow
Arvin Schnell
Thomas Goettlicher
* URL : http://doc.opensuse.or
e/create those overrides?
Thanks to all in advance.
BR,
Björn Esser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iF4EAREIAAYFAk7YoqgACgkQ3u1SIc8s7PXfwQD/fbSFwAayBwrv2/H7
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Björn Esser"
* Package name: jailkit
Version : 2.1.4
Upstream Author : Olivier Sessink
* URL : http://olivier.sessink.nl/jailkit/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : chroot jail
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Björn Esser"
* Package name: libblocxx
Version : 2.2.0+svn536
Upstream Author : Kevin Harris
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/blocxx/
* License : BSD-3
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
Thanks a lot!
2011/11/4 Josue Abarca :
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:57:00PM +0100, Björn Esser wrote:
>> Hello there!
>>
>> My name is Björn Esser and I'm from near Hannover, Germany. I want to
>> contribute to the debian project and so I am looking for a spon
Hello there!
My name is Björn Esser and I'm from near Hannover, Germany. I want to
contribute to the debian project and so I am looking for a sponsor
(preferred with German as native). I hope, I'm in the right place here
for asking.
Best regards,
Björn Esser
Hallo zusammen!
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Björn Påhlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mandos
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Björn Påhlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Teddy Hogeborn <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.fukt.bsnet.se/man
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
But here is your answer.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 08:35:36PM +0200, Björn Johansson wrote:
Greetings!
I have a working install of Debian Etch over here and it's installed on
an Powerbook G3 "Lombard" and the version of VLC which is part of Debian
?
I'm thinking of maybe trying to compile the source on my own, but I
don't want to break the current installation of VLC, so, so far I
haven't tried it.
Björn Johansson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 12:18 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Steve> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman
> Steve> wrote:
> >> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you
> >> turn off krb4?
>
eeding devices in /dev. AFAIR the only device needed on my system was
/dev/null.
Björn
At 10:32 2004-12-09, you wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 09:24:37AM +0100, Björn Johansson wrote:
> At 16:48 2004-12-08, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:00:48PM +0100, Björn Johansson wrote:
> >> At 15:46 2004-12-08, you wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Dec 08, 2
certainly real cases
> in the archive.
My script currently only finds one:
- jpilot-backup depends on jpilot >= 0.99.4-1 but testing has 0.99.2-2
- jpilot-backup conflicts with jpilot << 0.99.4-1 but testing has 0.99.2-2
If you know of other cases, I'd appreciate a note so I can examine why my
script doesn't find them.
--
Björn
cognize a "bad" versioned conflict
from a "good". For instance, lvm10 conflicts with lvm2 << 1.95.15-3 while the
lvm2 version in testing is 1.95.15-1. Is this simply a case of lvm10
superseding lvm2, and nothing I should warn about? If so, how can I tell?
--
Björn
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ok. BTW, are you taking into account the possibility of a package being
> uninstallable due to versioned Conflicts, and Conflicts between packages
> which otherwise satisfy a package's dependencies?
No, not yet. I will look into it.
--
Björn
ot; link to see the checks done.
The page for openoffice.org shows an example of the output:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=openoffice.org
I intend to inhibit printout if one of alternative dependencies match, but
currently all broken dependencies are displayed.
--
Björn
a packages handled, such as libz-dev that libxml2 depends on.
There is no package or binary with that name listed in Sources.
2) How is meta package versioning handled? The gcc-defaults package, version
1.9, is the only package providing the gcc binary (without -version suffix) of
which many packages require version >= 2.95.
--
Björn
ar with the nuances. I already
trawl the dependency tree, what information would you like to distill from it?
(I.e. define "work-needed packages" and "cluster".)
A hypothetical example would be good, to get me on the right track.
(I'll be away for the weekend, so I can't respond until sunday.)
--
Björn
estions how to improve this and create other
information digests that can help developers find and choose areas to work on.
--
Björn
, libgdbi0, libgql-dev, libgql0, libgql0-driver-mysql
endloop: 546+0: a-48:a-50:h-44:i-74:i-48:m-50:m-44:m-43:p-46:s-50:s-49
now: 557+0: a-49:a-51:h-45:i-75:i-49:m-51:m-45:m-44:p-47:s-51:s-50
* alpha: qmailmrtg7
This bug is fixed now. Thanks for reporting it.
--
Björn
versions of xmms-sid and
xsidplay. This is not allowed, and thus sidplay-base is uninstallable.
The solution is to update all of the packages at once, which requires manual
intervention. As Colin Watson said, this has already been mentioned to the
maintainer so the packages should be going in soon.
--
Björn
on alpha.
Actually they are most likely uninstallable on many other platforms too, but
only the result for alpha is displayed.
--
Björn
users are
discouraged from running unstable, and for good reasons.
> I do like the sound of this, but saying it has a place and actually making
> it happen are very different things. There seems to be a lot of the former,
> and little of the latter
That tired old argument doesn't bite on me since I have already volunteered to
set up a testing-i386 release. :-)
--
Björn
catch up with time.
Direction need not come from on high, it more often evolves from long
discussions in developer mailing lists. That does not mean it does not exist.
--
Björn
Joe Buck wrote:
> However, the output is redundant in many cases.
Fixed now.
--
Björn
dates between frozen releases (except for security fixes).
The amount of backporting and apt-pinning going on suggests not all Debian end
users are content with yearly updates. A testing-like "middle ground" release
for end users definitely has a place in the Debian universe.
--
Björn
the same idea.
I'd volunteer to set it up, but I need to become a DD to access the relevant
data. Does anyone want to advocate/sponsor me?
(And, to avoid the whole "testing is a release tool" debate, we could call it
something else. 'trying', perhaps. ;-) )
--
Björn
e, only what has been done.
Surely between the appointed leader, techical committee, policy committee,
quality assurance team and the release management, there is some sort of
shared idea of where Debian is heading? This is, after all, more than just a
herd of cats.
--
Björn
quot; is only a useful response if anyone in the audience actually knows
what said code is supposed to achieve.
--
Björn
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2003 15:16:38 +0200, Björn Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > This brings back the question I never got an answer for: Who is
> > Debian for?
>
> Isn't is obvious? Me, of course. Y'all are working to p
to be used, Debian excludes the vast
majority of computer users. Is this intentional? Is it desired?
--
Björn
ow their version to
> fall behind on the bleeding-edge kernel, the resulting split might be
> permanent. :-/
The big difference is that one kernel version is not allowed to stop the
progress in all others. If a non-ix86 kernel falls behind, only that kernel
suffers. In Debian, all ports suffer if one port breaks.
--
Björn
e only testing in sid, not in sarge.
--
Björn
. Most new versions are fixes, either
of bugs or features. Changes that break source level compatibility are rather
rare.
--
Björn
requent uploads would not be as much of a problem if each new upload were not
immediately used for testing other packages. See whack-a-mole above.
Distributed development is fast. That's one of the many benefits of Free
Software. Any system designed to harness this flow of creativity must take the
volatility into account and take advantage of it, not treat it as a problem.
--
Björn
k I'll bother. Heck, I've got
what I want, why should I care about the rest of the world? Right?
The social contract says "We will be guided by the needs of our users". I
guess it all comes down to the definition of "our users".
--
Björn
ch is the
software in those releases is two years old.
Before brushing this aside as an uninformed rant, stop for a moment and
consider which release you'd recommend your computer-savvy-but-no-programmer
friends to use when they want to run linux at work. Then tell me there is no
problem.
--
Björn
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > 4) What is the best way to find out why cfitsio depends on gcc-3.3?
> looking in the Packages files?
> (do in on auric directly or d/l them and do it at home)
Where can I download these files? ("Packages" is a tricky word to search for...)
Thanks.
--
Björn
manage to
wrap my head around this.
Thanks.
--
Björn
y go into testing soon.
If not, why?)
Thanks.
--
Björn
version gets stuck in unstable, which is not uncommon).
I found only little in the debian developer manuals detailing how version
dependencies should, and should not, be used. Did I miss a section about
this, or is there a general consensus about the issue?
--
Björn
I would expect a ton of list archive links to have been dumped on
me by now. I have no qualms about squeezing blood from stone, but it doesn't
exactly speed the discussion nor minimize my annoying questions.
--
Björn
ing if they were rebuilt?
--
Björn
Jim Penny wrote:
> Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > Isn't this a problem? Especially for packages depending on libraries with
> > long release cycles, such as libgcc1 and libc6.
>
> Not often. Most slow release libraries are strongly backwards
> compatible.
That was m
e sufficient,
> so it plays safe.
Isn't this a problem? Especially for packages depending on libraries with
long release cycles, such as libgcc1 and libc6.
Note: I don't have a suggestion for a better method right now, I'm just
trying to understand the implications of the current system.
--
Björn
m build log for arm contains the following line:
checking whether to use libgcc... no
--
Björn
never considered.
I did search the archives, but failed to find a post addressing this issue.
--
Björn
hat I'm not advocating relaxing the inclusion criteria for testing. I am
just asking why they are not applied equally to all versions.
[0] http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html
[1] http://www.debian.org/devel/testing
--
Björn
Hi!
I want to know where I can get KDE packages for my Debian system.
I'm currently running Debian2.2r5. This is quite important since
I really lack a good mail client, I miss Kmail! :(
Kind regards Björn Johansson
55 matches
Mail list logo
