Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Collins
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libjwt14
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Contact: Ben Collins
* URL : https://libjwt.io
* License : MPL-2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : The
and haven't found anything quite
> fitting.
Can the patched code just look like:
#ifdef __ARMEL__
// Patched code
#else
// original code with atomic memory ops
#endif
--
Ben Collins
https://debian.org | https://ubuntu.com
https://ben-collins.blogspot.com
https://catchmo
e topical and media-
grouped rather than a package naming paradigm. The RFC type could be
expanded to https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc{ID}, for example.
--
Ben Collins
https://debian.org | https://ubuntu.com
https://ben-collins.blogspot.com
https://catchmobilehealth.com
--
3EC9 7598 16
> I don't know why you're asking me; I've already said that I would consider
> this configuration acceptable for a release architecture, but that I
> wouldn't recommend it to the Sparc porters.
What do you mean "wouldn't recommend it to the sparc porters"? And what
does your recommendation count f
> For sparc, a second buildd was brought on-line on auric this year because
> (IIRC) vore was not keeping up with the upload volume at the time; this
> required effort on DSA's part to clear enough disk space to be able to run a
> buildd, until which time sparc was holding some RC bugfixes out of t
It's also not something that would totally destroy an architecture's
ability to release. Yes, it would be bad, but not the end of the world.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:36:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I
went down for an extended period, but I do recall some
(m68k) having problems simply because of lack of processing power.
The guidelines are aimed at the wrong thing is my point.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:23:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
hould Debian be allowed to distribute
Linux if it can't handle these kinds of things?
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:31:14AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:32:37PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:11:39PM -08
Read my previous replies.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 10:54]:
> > Ah, so why is vore down now for some time now? If it's so easy to
>
> that should read as auric of course.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
Vore isn't down.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 03:25]:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:31:19PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
herrings, and just get back to work. Sparc has always
been and always will be a maintained architecture.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:17:42PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, I can guarantee that it never dies. The ha
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:11:39PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The requirement sucks, lets leave it at that. If the machine dies, I can
> > have two to replace it within a day or two.
> >
> > The point
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:31:19PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > > >I have an e3500
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >I have an e3500 to replace both auric and vore (and the raid), but I
> >haven't gotten an ok from James to do so yet.
>
> That would cut the number of sparc buildds down to one, when two a
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:20:07AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We can move services to supported architectures, but there is of
> > course one major problem: DSA is only willing to host stable .d.o
> > boxes but if many architectures don't
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:17:54AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > * Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 11:04]:
> > > > Also, this will make two ultrasparc machines available for some of our
> > > > new
> > > > spar
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:10:49PM +, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> * Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 11:04]:
> > > Also, this will make two ultrasparc machines available for some of our new
> > > sparc developers. I can't pay to ship them, but if Debian foots
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:04:42AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Also, this will make two ultrasparc machines available for some of our new
> > sparc developers. I can't pay to ship them, but if Debian foots the bill,
> > I&#x
> As I understand it, the plan was to convert auric into a buildd but
> the RAID needs to be fixed. Ben Collins was looking into this but I
> don't know about the status. I've also heard discussions several
> months ago about using one of Ben's really fast machines.
> This problem has already bitten several skilled Debian developers at various
> times. Given the problems that are caused for such skilled people as a
> result of this I hate to imagine the consequences for typical users!
But typical users wont be building custom kernels with ACL patches, will
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 05:42:22PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Could someone tell me which package uses jam instead make for building?
> I am trying to package netpanzer and it uses jam...
> I'd like to see any examples how to connect debian/rules with jam.
>
> I hope the
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:20:15PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> (I thought I sent this, but now I cannot find it to be sure.)
>
> I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own but
> which Debian does have available.
>
> I tried the recipe from the developer's manual using fakeroot.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:51:14PM +0200, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am asking your advice per policy section 10.9. [*]
>
> /etc/zorp is mode 0700 in upstream. In a typical setup, almost
> every single file under this directory contains sensitive information:
> firewall rules, cryptograph
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > I think this should be clearly discussed.
>
> Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
> the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
Thanks, you saved me from re
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 02:29:38PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> as of the latest update of libssl0.9.7 the postinst is able to restart
> certain services which use the ssl or crypto library, so that they don't
> use the faulty libraries any longer. I used part of the code from
>
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 02:29:38PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> as of the latest update of libssl0.9.7 the postinst is able to restart
> certain services which use the ssl or crypto library, so that they don't
> use the faulty libraries any longer. I used part of the code from
>
> __u8 short slot_tablelen;
Isn't it just a plain error? Either it's a char, or it's a short. It
can't be both, right?
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:47:10PM +0200, J?rgen A.Erhard wrote:
> I'm releasing these things now... have them in development and use for
> a couple weeks/months now.
>
> A Python module for doing debsigs-type package signatures and
> verification thereof. Uses and included module for GnuPG file
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:47:10PM +0200, J?rgen A.Erhard wrote:
> I'm releasing these things now... have them in development and use for
> a couple weeks/months now.
>
> A Python module for doing debsigs-type package signatures and
> verification thereof. Uses and included module for GnuPG file
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:44:31PM -0400, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> On amd64, we currently have a biarch-gcc that builds 32bit binaries by
> default, and 64bit ones with a -m64 option. Coding debian/rules for this
> is pretty trivial but still requires some ugly architecture specific
> hacks in ea
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 02:29:42PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> I intend to package the xplot utility from xplot.org. This tool is
> useful with the tcptrace package, which I maintain. However, there's
> already an xplot package that installs /usr/bin/xplot. It's not
> compatible with xplot.or
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:17:05PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi to all!
>
> Kernel 2.6 is to be released soon (hopefully), thus I tried to compile
> 2.5.69 on sparc64 recently. For those not knowing this arch: kernel is
> 64 bit, userland is 32 bit, thus you need a cross-compiler with host
> spa
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 11:25:03PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2003 22:15, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Because in Debian there is a few people with high "load" in debian,
> > and many with less "load". People with high load are more likely to
> > burn out and disappear. It is
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> I just ran some stats on my APT sources (mostly Woody), and discovered
> that the distribution of number of packages per developer is very
> uneven. This is the histogram of developers with the specific number
> of packages
> That behavior always struck me as fairly evil -- it's never fun when one
> single bit flip can take down a system, and I'd like to see the number
> of bits that can do so be as small as possible. Now that you point out
> the actual code I wish we could do away with that check. Does it really
> bu
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 11:23:51AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> En r?ponse ? Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Alioth seems to be down, pings seems to stop at gatekeeper.terena.nl
> > ...
> >
> > Was this expected?
>
> Yes, and no.
>
> No, because it is a connection failure.
> Yes,
> What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
If we're doing "let's have a conf where we normally don't" how about we
have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
nothern Virginia are myself.
Too many conferences are held on the US's West coast, and if con
> ==
>
> PROPOSAL
> __
>
> Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying:
> ___
> On the 12th March I sent out a maintainer ping to 191 possibly
> inactive Debian developers. The list of developers was generated by
> looking first at all maintainers who didn't have a source package
> signed by (one of) their key(s) in unstable and then excluding from
> that anyone who had bee
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 12:13:08PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On pe, 2003-04-25 at 11:09, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
> > They just don't support i386 anymore.
> >
> > http://www.suse.de/en/private/products/suse_linux/i386/system_requirements.html
> > http://www.redhat.com/software/linux/technica
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 11:13:59PM +0200, Anders Widman wrote:
> >> all that was removed was *code* that gets compiled. If the maintainer
> >> cannot arbitrarily change any code he wants, then it is not clear that
> >> the program is DFSG-free.
>
> > Amen. Making part of the code immutable is n
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 08:24:21PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> > Now I hope you stop with your trolling and consider speaking
> > respectfully to us. I am pretty sure that if you emailed the maintainer
> > of the package and pointed out the facts to him, he would revert the
> > change.
>
> Dude,
>
> all that was removed was *code* that gets compiled. If the maintainer
> cannot arbitrarily change any code he wants, then it is not clear that
> the program is DFSG-free.
Amen. Making part of the code immutable is not what I call free
software. What if I want to use parts of the code and I re
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 08:07:03PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Please explain your reasons for removing the credits and attributions
> from the reiserfs utilities in violation of our copyright.
>
> You'll note that ReiserFS anticipated the GNU GPL V3 by including
> clauses that forbid removal of
> 1/ we don't want to have to know the technical
> details of how to get to the step4/ above (in the
> given table above).
> 2/we want one of the following:-
> A/ to be able to insert a floppy disk into
> our "a" drive , turn on the computer,
> the comp
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 07:29:23PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in
> > the primary runtime.
>
> ltdl needs them at runtime.
Then ltdl is broken. How doe
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:50:22AM +0200, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> According to Junichi's manual they should be in -dev packages (that
> makes sense, since they are only used by libtool builds).
Yes, it's a bug. Consider that the .la file is usually without soname
(e.g. libfoo.la) it will clash when
> But I do have a cursor font, even though I don't have xfonts-gimpers 1.8
> installed (it refuses to install anyway). But I do have xfonts-artwiz
> installed. I purged xfonts-gimpers from my system and now X has a brain
> tumor. This is a critical bug and should have been fixed by now.
apt-get in
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:01:06AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> A couple of people on a recent thread in debian-devel linked to a
> message I recently posted on Slashdot on this subject. I had thought
> about posting this information to Debian's lists as well, but at the
> time, didn't see a n
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:14:51AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
> Hi! (it's my first post here)
Fucking idiot. Yes, I can say that now. I'll only be DPL for another ~20
hours. Here, let me say it again. Fucking idiot.
Man that felt good.
Ben (not the DPL for much longer) Collins
--
Debi
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:44:36PM +0200, Rune B. Broberg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> > Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
> > thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
> >
> > Do you think you
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:43:32PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > ...to bring in other fixes that aren't so easy to seperate from smaller
> > ones.
> >
> > Lose the tone, it wont get you what you want. Nice is being fixe
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:27:04PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > > This problem is very common for non-free software.
> >
> > ... which really doesn't seem all that relevant apart from sounding
> > good; hell, the change in nice()'s return value appears t
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:22:00AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> It's because of this that I continue to feel that kernel interfaces are
> best defined by the kernel.
>
> If the kernel headers aren't an interface, why do they exist? There
> appears to be a very large philosophical gulf here
>
> What we really should have is a nice low-level C library that encapsulates
> such things and lets anyone use it...
>
All we really need is a master ioctl header that defines the numbers. It
would be Debian specific, but what the hell.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - htt
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:30:03PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > > That's all of three 100GB IDE disks running in RAID 0. Four disks if for
> > > some reason you want redundancy on your cache.
> >
> > Surely you don't presume that a) All of our autobuilders have enough
> > bays for 3 IDE di
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 23:17, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > > Looking at my testing PPC box with grep-available, we have only about
> > > 8GB total Installed-Size.
> >
> > glibc packages total ins
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:48:49AM +0200, Paul Russell wrote:
> On Monday 01 April 2002 18:23, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > > The same package: almost never
> > > the same file: often, with every new compile.
> > >
> > > Just take into acco
ndi? Once we know
> exactly what the problems is we can look at fixing it.
The problem is that it creates a rootfs (I believe) and copies
/sbin/lilo blindly to the new rootfs. Thus, you just have a broken shell
script.
--
.--===-=-======-=---=--
-mcpu=ultrasparc line. It is not fully
supported in gcc, and not to mention that if it did work, it would break
the package on sparc32 platforms.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
We need 100, and I'll pay $1/unit. When can we expect shipment?
--
.--===-=-==-=---=----=-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
>
> Ben is merely behind with updating the BTS, by the looks of it...
>
Can't close it till I fix woody/sid too. Which will be when 2.2.5 is
released (days).
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--
of OpenLDAP2...
Uh, don't hardcode deps, and more importantly, don't compile against
packages that aren't available. I seriously doubt that everything in
2.0.18's API works with 2.0.14.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:15:07PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:05:02PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > binary of the newest package of each build dep available in unstable
> > > before building the package. If that is not the case I would hav
on of a library, well you have
to build-depend on it. That's the whole reason for having them there.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---=----=-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
ed to run `locale-gen' after edit the file.
Thanks,
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=========---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 04:45:14PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 01:42:45AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > But you do agree that it requires having *some* data, no matter what
> > > "game" it's for? Which means having a Depend
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 06:32:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I think that's rediculous. Education is not a smokescreen, and you can't
> > > > argue that there will never be free data availabl
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 04:01:25AM +, Adam Olsen wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 10:49:33PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 06:57:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > >
> > > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 08:08:56PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Second, your example seems totally fabricated. If there were a
> > > plausible enterprise--ANYONE--who was seriously planning on using this
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 07:56:26PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The purpose of the sources released is a gaming engine. They did not
> > release "quale2 the game", which is what the data files consist o
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 06:57:45PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But quake2-engine does not depend on anything to fulfill it's purpose.
> > It is a gaming engine, not a game. This is the same logic t
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 04:08:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 12:22:27AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > >
> > > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
Do
not judge the engine based on the data files that are available for it
(else we'll have to start judging script interpreters and libraries the
same way).
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=====-------==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 12:22:27AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, I'm going to upload libgaming. Nothing yet has been created for it,
> > but it is possible. Should I upload it to contrib?
>
> Can yo
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 11:50:00PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think that's rediculous. Education is not a smokescreen, and you can't
> > argue that there will never be free data available for qu
On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 10:48:09AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 01:42:41PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > blimpo:~# gcc
> > gcc: No input files
> >
> > You have to write or get code for gcc. Should we deliver a hello.c with
> > gcc
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:40:06PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So if I create a game with _no_ levels, but the tools to create them,
> > then is it none-free? Just because the only ones available are non-free,
&
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 07:35:59PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 01:42:41PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > gcc to meet those same requirements? You do realize that there are
> > plenty of free levels out there for quake2 right? We don't have to
> &
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:54:10PM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ben Collins writes:
> >Don't discount sparc just because the code is broken. That's a bug in
> >itself. Fix the code, get it to compile. SPARC is one of the most
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 07:07:06PM +0100, Mikael Hedin wrote:
>
> Ben Collins writes:
> > Start you own build on vore.debian.org and find it there.
>
> Smart. You should be our leader ;-) Sorry for being rather stupid.
>
> Anyway, g++-3.0 seems to be completely brok
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:07:02PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 11:06:11AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:57:21PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > >
> > > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:23:31PM +0100, Mikael Hedin wrote:
>
> Ben Collins writes:
> > Your package better use gcc, not gcc-3.0. Using anything other than the
> > default supported compiler gets you a bug report.
>
> But it doesn't build with g++-2.95.
Then fix
port.
Other than that, check the config.log output to see why it failed.
--
.--===-=-======-=====---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:57:21PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That's not true. If it is possible to create game levels for it that are
> > free, than it is considered free. It's not like you can&
ls that a person can play, then it only
> belongs in contrib.
That's not true. If it is possible to create game levels for it that are
free, than it is considered free. It's not like you can't get anything
but id's game data.
Ben
--
.--===-=-===
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 12:19:01PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
>
> > This isn't a matter of not using it, it's a matter of a sane base
> > install. Perhaps base-config could ask if the user wants locales. Kno
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 09:25:04AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 03:16:25AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 08:24:43AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > #include
> > > Santiago Vila wrote on Mon Sep 03, 2001 um 02:21:04AM
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:22:12AM +0300, Ari Makela wrote:
> Ben Collins writes:
>
> > With an installed size of over 8megs, I don't think that is such a good
> > idea.
>
> During the configuration phase we get a rough time zone
> information. For example,
es beeint installed by default, either
> allways, or with some user interacton (yes/no, which locale etc.). IMO
> this should be included as one of the first questions in baseconfig.
With an installed size of over 8megs, I don't think that is such a good
idea.
--
.--===-=-
l package managers atleast can aim for something,
instead of shooting in the dark like we do now. The LSB needs to stay
away from trying to standardize a binary format (who cares if it's
tar.gz, ar or cpio). They will only piss people off.
Ben
--
---=======-=-======-=---==
solve a problem that will become a
> non-issue as people realise this and stop using kernel headers.
That's wishful thinking, but I agree. I'm not sure it is possible
though.
--
---===-=-==-=========---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on
ed to the kernel-headers package
scripts? Does anyone see a problem with this solution (that isn't
already a problem with the current usage of kernel headers in libc6-dev
that is)? Anyone got a solution for the -preX case, which would probably
make this method rock solid?
Ben
--
---
ers-2.2
or
Build-Depends: kernel-headers-2.4
You'll notice that recent kernel-headers packages provide the
major.minor if the kernel version.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- D
tell netscape
and any other web browser to just view the contents as plain text.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=====--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
art of Virginia (Gloucester to be exact). My resume is
referenced below (I am a Debian developer).
http://marcus.seva.net/~bmc/resume/
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
`
if
void std::reverse(std::vector::iterator, std::vector::iterator);
Just FYI :)
--
-------===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:27:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Mon, 30 Apr 2001 10:59:24 -0400,
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > > I cannot find out why `libdb-3' is used and spreaded over the gnome
> > > packages. Naming soname is sensitive issue, IMHO.
> >
>
The former is not very conformant to soname schemes, the
latter is. Gnome can use whatever it wants to link with it, but the
soname is still libdb3.so.3.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage...
. It is only there so that things compiled
against the upstream soname will work.
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
1 - 100 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
