On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:31:19PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > > >I have an e3500 to replace both auric and vore (and the raid), but I > > > >haven't gotten an ok from James to do so yet. > > > > > > That would cut the number of sparc buildds down to one, when two are > > > required for RC archtectures under the new proposal. > > > > That's ok because two buildd's can run on the one machine. It has 6 cpu's. > > That cannot be the requirement. The point has to be an additional and > independently functioning piece of hardware. If the disk blows or it > is compromised or something, the others should be able to continue.
The requirement sucks, lets leave it at that. If the machine dies, I can have two to replace it within a day or two. The point being, there's no reason to have two seperate machines when one can do the job. As long as it keeps up, then there should be no cause for concern. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
