Re: Orhpaned packages: imms, lwatch, rrdcollect

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 04:59:31PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Artur R. Czechowski , 2015-12-28, 16:17: > >- rrdcollect http://bugs.debian.org/809234 > ITYM #809235 Indeed. Cheers Artur -- Po co mamy ze sobą rozmawiać, skoro tak łatwo się

Orhpaned packages: imms, lwatch, rrdcollect

Dear DDs, Due to lack of resources I am unable at this moment to maintain mine packages properly. So, I am looking for a new maintainers for packages: - imms http://bugs.debian.org/809233 - lwatch http://bugs.debian.org/809234 - rrdcollect http://bugs.debian.org/809234 If you like, y

Upstream stopped to ship tar.gz file. What to do?

Hello, Upstream of imms stopped to ship tar.gz file and ships only tar.bz2. However, there is no new upstream release at the moment. The question is: Shall I prepare new release of Debian package using tar.bz2 tarball? There was a short discussion on #debian-devel, but there was no conclusion. Po

Re: Switching the default /bin/sh to dash

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 07:31:15AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:47:07AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > Am Donnerstag 25 Juni 2009 05:21:45 schrieb Raphael Geissert: > > > I just noticed I forgot to say something: > > > > What won't change: > > > > * Bash will still be u

/emul/ia32-linux to lib32 transition

Hello, I made a quick glance at /emul/ia32-linux to lib32 transition in BTS. There was some bugreports submitted. All I spotted can be seen using following link: http://42.pl/u/1GEo Shouldn't all of them be set to RC severity as they are uninstallable at the moment? Additionaly, I've found that ia

Re: Who uses @packages.d.o mail?

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only > accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work > with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail > from debia

Bug#523797: ITP: svnmanager -- webbased tool to administer a Unix Apache WebDAV Subversion repository server.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Artur R. Czechowski" * Package name: svnmanager Version : 1.05 Upstream Author : M. Verkerk * URL : http://svnmanager.sourceforge.net/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: PHP Description : webbas

Bug#523794: ITP: php-version-control-svn -- wrapper interface for the Subversion command-line client

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Artur R. Czechowski" * Package name: php-version-control-svn Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Clay Loveless http://pear.php.net/account-mail.php?handle=clay * URL : http://pear.php.net/package/VersionControl_SVN

Is Florent Bayle MIA?

Hello, It looks like Florent Bayle is MIA - last upload from him is from 2007 Jan. He sill figures as a sole maintainer for three source packages: cd5, hugin and libpano12. Possibly libpano12 could be removed from Debian after taking care about hugin. Regards Artur -- Artur R

libqglviewer and two versions of Qt.

Hi, I maintain the libqglviewer library - OpenGL 3D viewer library based on Qt. Currently the library is linked against Qt3, but there are requests about libqglviewer with Qt4[1][2]. My question is: how long will Qt3 be available in Debian? I assume it will be available in lenny - if not, please co

Re: I am confused about configuration files

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [cut] > > Is the only way to make sure that conffiles do not clutter filesystem to > > remove them in maintainer's script on upgrade from previous version? > I

I am confused about configuration files

Hello developers, Trying to run insserv and dependency based boot sequence on my workstation I run into a phenomenon I cannot understand. Let's see an example: xserver-xorg package. I have latest version from unstable: ii xserver-xorg 1:7.3+10 the X.Org X server Let's see the content of

Re: Reclaiming automake

Hi Eric, On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 07:11:14PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > automake1.4: This is the old school package, that's been completely > unsupported for a number of years (since 2002). It certainly not used > with any new software and any software still using it should be > migrated away fro

Bug#312819: ITP: olive -- console RSS reader

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: olive Version : b6 Upstream Author : Shawn Boyette * URL : http://mdxi.collapsar.net/hacks/olive/ * License : MIT/X Description : a co

Bug#307166: RFA: vim-latexsuite -- brings the LaTeX power to Vim

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hello, I use LaTeX rarely recently and I am no longer interested in maintaining this package. If anyone is interested please adopt this package. It is recommended that new maintainer has profound knowledge about vim scripting. Tha package has 9 outstanding bugs, 5 of

Re: ${lib}-dev, .pc and pkg-config

On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 05:49:22AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > I've checked the libpkg guide, and I found a chapter called > 'Annotated list of files that usually reside in -dev package' > which contains reference to pkgconfig. Hell, right. I was looking for string "pkg-config" and I didn't fin

${lib}-dev, .pc and pkg-config

Hello, I would like to ask about common practice in packaging libraries, especially their development files. There is a rather old tool like pkg-config. It gives standarized interface[1] for getting compiler and linker flags. What is your recomendation for adding a .pc files in -dev package? What i

Re: changing architecture from any to all

On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:58:24PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Hypothetical situation: a compiled executable gets replaced with a shell > script. > Real situation: an architecture-dependent library packages gets > replaced by an architecture-independent dummy transitional package. Real situation

Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:42:06PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:34:13AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > > What about RSA tokens? This solution does not require any special hardware > > to connect on the client side. > This also means it do

Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:49:21PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 20:34, "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:00:51PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > > > I agree that smartcards would help a lo

Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:00:51PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > I agree that smartcards would help a lot. However as has been previously > suggested the cost of 1200+ smart-card readers is probably prohibitive. What about RSA tokens? This solution does not require any special hardware to connect

Re: debian binary package

oes your softwaer use autotools in build proces? Have you run ./configure before make? Cheers Artur PS. Please wrap lines at 72nd character. -- Artur R. Czechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hell.pl/arturcz

Re: Bug#217980: Autobuilders and nut package

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote: > PS: the upload is scheduled this afternoon (+6h max) I see package is uploaded to incoming. Thanks :) BTW, it probably requires manual intervention from buildd maintainers. Cheers Artur -- [...] jestem wredna, żelazna małpa

Autobuilders and nut package (#217980)

Hello This bug causes autobuilders stop work. It is possible to fix it ASAP? http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=lftp&ver=2.6.8-2&arch=hppa&stamp=1068852612&file=log&as=raw http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=rrdcollect&ver=0.2.1-5&arch=mipsel&stamp=1068836320&file=log&as=raw Cheers

Re: Changes in t1lib.

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:23:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I suggest the following: [cut] Looks good. Ftpmasters probably would kill me, because t1lib5 is uploaded to experimental, but it looks really better than my schedule. If there will be no objection from ftpmaster I will follow your

Re: gimp1.2: gimp package suggest non-free software

On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:54:29AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote: > > > It is also possible to create GIFs using a patent-free run > length encoding but this doesn't achieve the compression that > one normally expects in a GIF. > >

Re: Changes in t1lib.

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:04:18AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Recall that Apt figures out dependency chains for most people. The only > people you're going to offend with the ugliness are people who already > think like Debian developers. And in my experience, one can't cross the > street w

Re: Changes in t1lib.

On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:22:14PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:09:27PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > > I changed the naming scheme. All binary packages contain version in its > > name, i.e.: t1lib-dev is now named t1lib1-dev. Of course old pac

Re: Changes in t1lib.

On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 03:03:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > OTOH, if you provide me good arguments why I should change name of t1lib, > > and good explanation why a new package, let's say rsplib, does not conform > > to this rule, I will not insist anymore. > 1) Consistency is good, and m

Re: Changes in t1lib.

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:35:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > If you're renaming them anyway, why not follow Policy 8.1 and > s/t1lib/libt1-/ (yielding libt1-1, etc.)? Yes, I thought about it. But there is no strict rule in Policy, just recommendation. There are many other packages which do not

Changes in t1lib.

Hello Developers, I would like to inform you, that some important changes happened to t1lib 1.3.1-4[1] package. I changed the naming scheme. All binary packages contain version in its name, i.e.: t1lib-dev is now named t1lib1-dev. Of course old packages are provided as a dumb packages with depend

Re: gcc stops migration to testing?

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:55:14PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Artur R. Czechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have no gcc dependencies neither build-deps. > On i386. > Check e.g. the binaries on arm, one of them (or its dependencies) > probably depends on

gcc stops migration to testing?

Hello, Could you enlight me where "Depends: php4-rrdtool gcc-3.3 (not considered)" comes from on http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php4-rrdtool.html? I have no gcc dependencies neither build-deps. Cheers Artur -- szybszy niz najwyzszy budynek... inteligentniejszy od kuli w locie...

bitmap vectorizers

[ note: I have no interests in denying any of those packages, there is ] [ a result of digging through wnpp bugs] Hello, There are two packages looking similar: #206859: O: autotrace -- Bitmap to vector graphics converter #208508: ITP: potrace -- utility to transfor

Re: File not removed during upgrade - help please

On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:52:04AM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > There is a package vim-latexsuite (0.20030726-2). This package contains I forgot to tell. If you want to check a package, it is available at: http://blabluga.hell.pl/vls/ Regards Artur -- Z próżnego i recover

File not removed during upgrade - help please

Hello list, There is a package vim-latexsuite (0.20030726-2). This package contains (among others) file /usr/share/vim/vim61/explorer.vim. This file conflicts with the vim file. I agreed with vim maintainer to divert this file. There is a new upstream version of this software. It does not require a

Re: An help to create an debian/rules

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:49:45PM -0300, Luiz Rafael Culik Guimaraes wrote: > yes, is shell script and rpm.spec allow this inside, so debian/rules allow > this. Well... To be precise: debian/rules does NOT allow shell scripts inside. It only allows shell commands. To catch a difference create Make

Re: @variables@ in debian/ scripts

On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:07:59AM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > If there are multiple binary packages from one source package some Well... I should read debian/rules for those packages more carefully. Please ignore this thread. Cheers Artur -- Czesiu: Dlaczego wypiłaś cały dzba

@variables@ in debian/ scripts

Hello If there are multiple binary packages from one source package some developers use @variables@ in config and {pre,post}{inst,rm} scripts. Where those variables comes from? Where can I find any documentation about it? Waiting your help Artur -- "#gaduly to jak wenezuelski serial. Nie

Re: Removal of automake1.5, Phase 2: The Mass Bug filing

On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 08:28:40PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > Luckily, my previous message seemed to have spurred many into action, > as only 21 source packages have automake1.5 in their Build-Depends > line, and of those only: Some packages has been fixed (bugs closed or NMUed). I've checked all

Re: Should this be filed as grave? Gcc-2.95

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:26:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:32:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > I don't take kindly to software installing other software without a > > clear need and there simply was no clear need. > Well, now, why don'tcha run 'em outta town, Te

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:00:03PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > There are enough SMTP/POP3 MUAs which do not need any MTA infrastructure on > the local host, whatsoever. But there are some important packages which depends on MTA directly, like: at, cron, debconf, logrotate, mailx. I can imagine

Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

n until an agreement is reached. Regards Artur -- Artur R. Czechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#203820: Incorrect expanding [] glob

Package: bash Version: 2.05b-8.1 Severity: normal Hello When LC_COLLATE is set to pl_PL [] glob does not work correctly: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/bash-test$ echo $LC_COLLATE pl_PL [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/bash-test$ touch a b C c D e F G h [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/bash-test$ echo [A-Z] b c C D e F G h

Re: debconf 2005 in Vienna, Austria

On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:29:06AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:12:08AM +0200, Amaya wrote: > > Martin List-Petersen dijo: > > > Something like that sounds sane. It gives even the possibility > > > organising a "shuttle"-bus or something likewise from LinuxTag to > > >

Re: Bug#200163: ITP: png2ico -- command-line PNG to ICO converter

On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Thomas Thurman wrote: > from convert(1) > Convert recognizes the image formats listed in ImageMagick(1). > > from ImageMagick(1) > o ICO *r-- Microsoft icon > o ICON *r-- Microsoft icon You have been told, what a r letter mea

Re: 469 packages still using dh_undocumented, check if one is yours

On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 11:26:44AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > Could the dh_undocumented programm allways fail with an error "Don't > > use me" as the next step? That way all new uploads will be forced to > > care. > No. Breaking 400+ packages so our uses cannot build them

Re: 469 packages still using dh_undocumented, check if one is yours

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 10:27:35PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > It _is_ already the case, also for linda. And you can get results > quite easy from > http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tlink-to-undocumented-manpage.html This is treated by lintian as a warning. Policy says, that lack of manpage is c

Re: 469 packages still using dh_undocumented, check if one is yours

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 05:59:57PM +0200, Benjamin Drieu wrote: > This doesn't help if you maintain dozens of packages and you just want > to know if one of your packages is offending. On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 06:18:06PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Uhm, it's far easier just to generate the list

Re: 469 packages still using dh_undocumented, check if one is yours

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:47:52AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | I came accross some sources still using dh_undocumented so I did a > | quick search through sids *.diff.gz files. Here is the result: > Such a list is useless unless it includes maintainer addresses (or > just maintainer names) as

Re: Debconf or not debconf

Hello On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote: > Since debconf is not really appreciated for this use, what is the best > solution ? Inform users with debconf or give them informations only in > changelog and README.Debian ? Important changes should be announced to us

Re: Package Lists and Size

On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:21:05PM +, Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > With which apt version ? > I don't find any usr/lib/apt/methods/rsync :( http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg00176.html Regards Artur -- [00:54] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a poza tym, to ja sobie zakł

Re: /etc/hostname

On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 09:20:34AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > However, I've seen problems caused by the use of the short name only in > /etc/hostname (mostly mail-related, maybe?) and I systematically change Most MTA's (at least: sendmail, postfix and exim) has options in configuration which al