wanted to contact you to talk about a possible
> overhanding of xmltex (I saw, that the xmltex page says, it's part of
> texlive).
>
> > We therefore intend to essentially take over xmltex and passivetex,
>
> No objections from me. I CCed Ardo van Rangelrooij, who seems
&
at is required to fix some major bugs reported agains
> python-4suite.
I'll take care of it this Monday or Tuesday.
Thanks,
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libtest-manifest-perl
Version : 0.91
Upstream Author : Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/
* License : GPL, Artistic
Description : Per
27;m running this in a chroot environment (I've got several of these
for the different type of packages I maintain and have had no problem so far).
Also in a pbuilder it fails (which is also a chroot environment).
I've no idea what's going on here, nor where to look for a possible
Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 08:35:56PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> > * Package name: libxml-libxml-common-perl
>
> I'm sure you're just being consistent, or conforming with policy, but
> these "libxml-libxml&quo
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-26
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libxml-libxml-common-perl
Version : 0.12.1
Upstream Author : Christian Glahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/XML/
* License : Artistic, G
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-18
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libpod-sax-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/
* License : Artistic
Description : Perl module for generating
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-17
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libtime-piece-perl
Version : 1.07
Upstream Author : Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/
* License
Atsuhito Kohda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: problem generating PDF output for large DebianDoc docs
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 21:26:47 -0500
>
> > After somewhat more rigorous testing on some larger documents it appe
tities requiring the offending LaTeX package for now so we can
at least have all this working for woody and resolve the problem with the
appropriate authoritives on Debian's LaTeX packages in woody+1.
Any other thoughts?
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PR
t be much of a
> problem since it doesn't change the manual text... Cc:ed -policy so Julian
> or Manoj are aware.
>
> --
> 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe&q
Jonathan McDowell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:33:39PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> > Martin F Krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > also sprach Ardo van Rangelrooij (on Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:42:44AM)
> > > > I would like to propose
Martin F Krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> also sprach Ardo van Rangelrooij (on Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:33:39PM -0500):
> > - filing a request for the mailing list
>
> i'll set one up. filing against lists.debian.org takes too long.
Please do. Something like '[EMAIL PROT
Martin F Krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> also sprach Ardo van Rangelrooij (on Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:42:44AM)
> > I would like to propose to form an Apache (web server) task force to
> > maintain the Apache packages currently maintained by Johnie Ingram
> > (netgod) (an
T.Pospisek's MailLists ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose to form an Apache (web server) task force to
> > maintain the Apache packages currently maintained by Johnie Ingram
> > (netgod) (and po
David N. Welton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Sounds like a good idea. I would also be willing to help out if
> anything is needed from the ASF, although I'm not involved with the
> server project itself.
Ok, thanks.
Regards,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAI
Daniel Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:01:49AM -0500, Ardo_Vanrangelrooij wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:36:37AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: Johnie I
.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo
PGP fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
, the XML-using perl and php modules work,
> and even mod_dav works (the only thing that actually needs expat in the
> first place).
But does it really need to be in apache for mod_dav? I'll ask the maintainer
to check whether it can live without expat in apache.
> Oh, and feel fr
Jonathan McDowell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 03:51:05PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
>
> [AxKit not working due to Apache expat linkage]
>
> > I've no problem NMU'ing apache, but that might break other packages
> > (which?). The
the least version of expat (as described in bug #96093): that's
more work given the way it's currently packaged (the upstream source are
in tarballs which are unrolled during build)
Any help in resolving this situation is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooi
h type
is meant SGML application and/or DTD, stylesheet, etc.
After that we can start working on the transition itself.
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home page: http://www.debian.org/~ardo
PGP fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
s in the expat-lite
> version, so there is no possibility of code mixing and matching. Pro:
> Solves the Cons of the first two options. Con: more difficult to do,
> introduces what could be viewed as a gratuitous incompatibility with
> the mainstream Apache distribution.
--
Ardo van Ran
> I already handed them off to Ardo... you technically asked first,
> but my checkmail script only checks messages from my Inbox and a few
> other select folders, so I didn't see yours until now... sorry :(
>
> Thanks,
> Stevie
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PROT
free to find good homes with other maintainers... here's a list of
> the packages I intend to orphan:
>
> libxml-parser-perl
> libxml-dom-perl
> libxml-cgi-perl /* Does this exist anymore on CPAN? I haven't found
> * it since I originally packaged it.
>
authors said they had modified it from the CPAN version. I didn't check
> to see if it was true. Would you like to look at that package and see if
> we can cooperate?
>
> --
> Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 25 May 1999, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote
ion scheme
names (if Unicode::Map8 is installed). For example, the Unicode::Map8
scheme name for 'windows-1251' is 'cp1251'.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home page: http://www.tip.nl/users/ardo.van.rangelrooij
PGP fp:
tabstop size with tabstop().
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home page: http://www.tip.nl/users/ardo.van.rangelrooij
PGP fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
er codes for country identification (ISO 3166).
For example, 'bo' is the code for 'Bolivia'.
The primary use (for me at least) is in the DebianDoc-SGML package.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home page: http://www.tip.nl/u
Hi,
The version in slink of the debiandoc-sgml package has an undeclared
dependency on the libwww-perl package. Is it still allowed to upload
a corrected version? This doesn't involve any code changes, just an
extra dependency declaration in the debian/control file.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ard
now you can just do the following to work around it:
>
> cd /usr/sbin
> mv sendmail sendmail.socks
> ln -s sendmail.real sendmail
>
> This moves the wrapper script aside and links sendmail to the real
> sendmail executable.
>
> Mike.
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email:
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since /usr/lib/perl5/5.005 is not listed we're probably having a
> problem at hand. Maybe a Perl bug?
I meant here of course /usr/lib/perl5/5.004.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAI
gt; rectified the problem by simply linking SGMLS into /usr/lib/perl5/5.005,
> but that is hardly a solution.
> --
> ---MAV
>
> Marc A. Volovic | Comfort, n: A feeling one gets from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | contemplating discomfort in another.
> htt
sendmail complained that "van" and
"Rangelrooij)" are unknown users and "Rangelrooij)... Unbalanced ')'".
Am I doing something wrong here, or is sendmail's behaviour being
changed? I tried several qoutes and such, but nothing seemes to
overcome th
l)
Within the Debian Documentation Project we're working on a Debian
Tutorial (as well as some other documents and manuals). Maybe you
want to join us?
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home page: http://www.tip.nl/users/ardo.van.rangelr
ltiple passes over an input file, such as grog'. I
> > have once read something in the Linux Journal about using multiple passes
> > to get embedded ps images to print right. I'll have to dig that up again,
> > because for me the the images get left out, while all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On 15 Jun 1997, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
>
> > I have another policy issue which is related to topic 11 (see below).
> >
> > The current layout of Info entries in the mai
t;much better. Should we ship only HTML by default and put
>.info in a seperate package? (cf. bug #7890)
> - how "large" may doc files be until they are moved into a
>seperate package?
>
>
- --
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
38 matches
Mail list logo
