Daniel Leidert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 15:46 +0200 schrieb Frank K?ster: > > > in the last months or even years, xmltex and passivetex have been > > basically unmaintained (and they *do* have bugs), and responses from the > > list which is listed as maintainer are very rare. jadetex is actually > > maintained by you, Ohura-san, but maybe gets not as much care as it > > could have - and anyway the coordination with the TeX Task Force could > > be better than we currently manage for a package so tightly coupled to > > TeX. > > > > On the other hand, integration of these three components into TeXLive > > has already been accomplished upstream, and we only cut them out because > > they existed as separate packages already in the days of teTeX only. > > I already saw that and wanted to contact you to talk about a possible > overhanding of xmltex (I saw, that the xmltex page says, it's part of > texlive). > > > We therefore intend to essentially take over xmltex and passivetex, > > No objections from me. I CCed Ardo van Rangelrooij, who seems > responsible for xmltex as part of the Debian XML/SGML group.
No objections from me also. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
