Hi Guido,
I have an interest in calendaring & contacts myself, and while I
probably can't make it to such meetings very often in Europe I'd
appreciate being aware of plans, just in case I can participate in some
useful way, even if remotely.
Thanks,
Andrew.
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 02:10 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> It is my recollection that each field in the control file (and
> perhaps others) was supposed to follow rfc822 (now rfc5322), and that
> says:
> ,
> |Each header field is logically a single line of characters comprisi
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 07:35 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 21:04:30 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > we have an unfortunate situation where the practice in dpkg-buildpackage
> > and the policy do not match fully.
...
> So I think for next dpkg upload we should make dpkg-
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 03:34 +, Noah Slater wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 08:07:23PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > NEW rejections are even stronger than an RC bug. Apart from questions of
> > whether that's useful documentation for users, I have a hard time seeing
> > either of your reasons
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: davical
Version : 0.9.5.1
Upstream Author : Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rscds.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: PHP
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libawl-php
Version : 0.30
Upstream Author : Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://andrew.mcmillan.net.nz/projects/awl
* License : GPL
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The maintainer of this package has not updated it for nearly a year and
has been put on hold in the NM queue due to being uncontactable.
I have uploaded a newer version as an NMU, but unless someone
strenuously o
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 19:23 -0500, martin f krafft wrote:
> Taking this to debian-devel...
>
> also sprach Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.28.1840 -0500]:
> > (c) Allocate partcipants to the groups in a round robin following
> > centrality order and sta
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 04:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 04:47:20PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > I imagine an improved protocol for the keysigning, which is based on
> > an idea I overheard after the party (and someone mentioned it in the
> > thread): instead of th
g out three warnings without taking the approach that you have for
this one...
> Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>whereami
Fixed now, and will upload in a few hours.
Regards,
Andrew McMillan.
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
