On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:57 +0200, Joey Hess wrote: > Joey Hess wrote: > > Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend > > on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0. > > As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these > > soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550 > > bugs. > (Original post here: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html) > > This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining, > down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not > read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
Thanks Joey - you're absolutely correct: I don't have the leisure to
follow debian-devel, nor do many, so it seems a little precipitate to be
firing out three warnings without taking the approach that you have for
this one...
> Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> whereami
Fixed now, and will upload in a few hours.
Regards,
Andrew McMillan.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew @ Catalyst .Net .NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
DDI: +64(4)803-2201 MOB: +64(272)DEBIAN OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267
The secret of being a bore is to say everything -- Voltaire
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
