On 08/10/2016 05:18 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
I think a fixed URL for downloading images of major versions would in
fact be good. But you still need to verify the integrity of that image,
for the internet is dark, and full of terrors.
Verification of the existing images has to happen regardless;
Master and murphy are changing colos. This entails a shutdown, de-rack, move
across town(not far, tho), and power back up. Est. time is 2 hours.
Nat rules will be installed, so that access can continue at the old addresses.
DNS will be updated after the move.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The point, however, is that it's rather silly to add yet another
> scripting language to the set of Essential packages. Sure, it'd be nice;
> but then tomorrow someone else will come along who will claim that
> Python is sucky and that Ruby is Teh Thin
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > There seems to be a fairly good amount of Debian Sarge packages
> > available via http://klik.atekon.de/. However, most of them are having
> > unmaintained recipes and therefore some of them do not work
> > properly. I think
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> >What does /bin/sh point to?
> >
> >
> >
> Could you please explain what is exactly what you need to check?
ls -l /bin/sh
In other words, what does /bin/sh point to?
What shell is /bin/sh? bash? zsh(gods no)? posh? dash?
--
To UNSUBS
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just did an upgrade on Sid and an upgrade on Linus tree. Since
> then, I can't create a kernel-image.
> gcc version 4.0.3 20060115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-7)
> Package: kernel-package
> Version: 10.032
>
> I just would love to
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> In my point of view, maintainer field just need to be change when
> Ubuntu does a non-trivial change on it. Otherwise, at least to me, is
> OK to leave the maintainer field unchanged. Directly imported source
> (that will be just recompiled by Ubuntu)
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Debian developers set the Maintainer field to themselves(or a team), when
> > they
> > upload to Debian. The upstream author is only mentioned in the copyright
> > file.
> >
> > Ubuntu should do something similiar. Set the Maintainer field to someo
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Debian developers set the Maintainer field to themselves(or a team), when
> > they
> > upload to Debian. The upstream author is only mentioned in the copyright
> > file.
> >
> > Ubuntu should do something similiar. Set the Maintainer field to someo
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > What I find very dissapointing is that mdz asked on debian-devel twice
> > for a decision from debian how ubuntu should handle the maintainer Field
> > without any luck:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00678.html
> > http://lists.de
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> Please consider ALL code written/maintained by me that is present in
> Ubuntu and is not bit-identical to code/binaries in Debian to be not
> suitable for release with my name on it.
Then how would d-i+debconf have gotten some of the enhancments that you
yo
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:00:40PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Since this sort of thing is apparently okay nowadays, and I know that
> > a lot of you like looking at lesbians, I'd like to share this with
> > you:
> >
> > http://www.flick
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> > So vim is in the simple, for newbies class?
>
> No, there's actually three classes: "Simple editors for newbies",
> "not-so-simple but, er, powerful editors", and "religions".
ae is the religion variety.
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Arnaud Kyheng wrote:
>
> Hello all and Happy New Year,
>
>
> Thanks to George, apt-torrent has been mentioned in the Debian Devel
> list :o)
>
> I've just noticed it, and the fun part of this discovery, is that I also
> found why my ISP has closed sianka.free.fr: Too much hits
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> On 1/3/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Why do you put the kernel together with the essential toolchain freeze, it
> > should be together with the rest of base, i believe.
> > [...]
> > We will have a kernel which is outdated by two
Today our main router's power supply bit the big one. However, it's back now.
Sorry for the inconvience.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's the wrong answer.
> >
> > What ever happened to standard unix tools? chmod/mkdir/chown/mv?
> >
> > You're suggesting doing things like some oth
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > How does persistance of the permission model work? Can I do chown/chmod on
> > the dynamic files in /dev, and have them remain the next time? Even if a
> > device node changes it's name? Or do I have to edit some alternative
> > database?
>
> You edit
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> > On Dec 29, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Because /eventually/ it will not be needed anymore (at least by most
> > > > users, wh
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 29, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Because /eventually/ it will not be needed anymore (at least by most
> > > users, which then will be able to remove it from their systems).
> > Is there som
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 29, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > To prepare for the eventual removal of makedev, I propose that packages
> > Er, why is makedev being removed? Please clue me in.
> "Eventual" is the
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Hi Milan, Jon,
>
> As discussed, 'the Debian project' as such has huge difficulties accepting
> hardware donations - offers are often turned down. (tangent - in my opinion
> donations should be accepted more liberally and if the Debian
> administrato
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> To prepare for the eventual removal of makedev, I propose that packages
> currently depending on it will add an alternative dependency to udev.
> Also, policy should be amended accordingly.
Er, why is makedev being removed? Please clue me in.
--
To U
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Hi all
>I might be acting paranoid here but just want to clarify couple of
> things. I was under the impression that, if I report a bug to
> bugs.debian.org, any future correspondence on that bug will be CCed to
> me automatically. Is this corr
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: checkgmail
> Version : 1.4
> Upstream Author : Owen Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://checkgmail.sourceforge.net/
> * Li
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:00:40AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > As you can see, %e will go away soon so /etc/udev/cd-aliases.rules will
> > not be supported anymore.
> > Some component of debian will have to install a rules file with static
> > aliase
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > No, the packages themselves would include such logic in their debian/rules.
> > There's no way we'd want to keep buildds in sync with what the set of core
> > packages is.
>
> That would realy defeat the purpose of not having to modify every deb
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > debs are created by debian/rules. So, only dependencies of dpkg would have
> > to
> > be modified.
>
> I was talking about the hypothetical situation of dpkg defaulting to
> !gzip compression and adding a Pre-Depends to the dpkg version
> requ
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, you are the expert, i said this, because the
> /usr/share/debconf/confmodule script i use in mkvmlinuz and recomended by
> debconf-devel says :
>
> # Redirect standard output to standard error. This prevents common
> # mistakes by mak
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> It would require some buildd hacking to get it to use gzip only for
> those few debs so more human power.
debs are created by debian/rules. So, only dependencies of dpkg would have to
be modified.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, c sojanc wrote:
> sir,
> i want user name and serial number to install Wildform
> Wild fx 3
id10t
42
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> File: foo%20bar/hellurei.txt
> Size: 12345
> MD5: 012345667
> SHA-256: 0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a
> Mode: 0644
Checksum:
md5: 0123456789[B
sha-256: 0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a
Having the names of the checksums be t
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Due to upstream ABI changes, it looks very likely that libfreetype is
> > going to have to undergo a library transition in the near future[0].
> > The details are still being settled, a
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
> >In the archive, 525 out of 283283 .deb's are dpkg-sig'd (0.19%). There
> >are 8 distinct keys used for those 525 .deb's, seven of which correspond
> >to DD's[1].
>
> So, most of the DD's do not care about security at all. Why does
> Debian have a reputatio
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:16:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > And while dash is also optional, all *correctly* written /bin/sh
> > > scripts should work with dash too.
> >
> > That's inco
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
> > The source and binaries *must* match, period. You can't have tarballs
> > being
> > constantly upgraded, and the binaries not, or vice versa. The
> > source+binary
> > must be done as a whole unit.
> >
> > Also, with this email, I am making a formal re
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
> OK, for your convenient, http://www.gnusolaris.org/sources shold has
> everything latest/not-committed tarballs of source code with our
> modifications for every package we are using.
>
> We are preparing cron job, so, will update them every night until we
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> The way I read it was that "the authors may pick any license, so long as it's
> DFSG-free". Do you see how it could be read that way?
You sound just like Henry Ford.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >
> > As for relicensing it, fuck off. I need to find a ClueBat(tm) attachment
> > for
> > the Sodomotron 2000.
> >
>
> ...which could certainly have been written:
>
>
> As one of the dpkg authors, I do not intent to relicence it.
>
>
> I actual
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 21:34 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This will never happen. Nobody sane who spent 50$ millon dollars VC's
> > > capital will open their IP for free. This is fact of life. And than
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
> To make it happen, we need to resolve "dpkg" issue and initial boot
> strapping process. Which is quite possible to re-write dpkg as CDDL
> software. But to avoid duplication of work, it will be wise for Debian
> community to release dpkg under LGPL licens
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, João Silva wrote:
> Anyone knows what package brings the todos command?
> I had this error in a debian-cd try:
> tools/add-bin-doc: line 42: todos: command not found
File a bug on that package for not using a depends.
Also, this is a -user question, not a -devel question.
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Michael Vogt:
>
> > When fully supported by the archive, the diff support will be
> > completely transparent, no changes on your side necessary.
The index support is broken for file urls. It works the first time(ie,
removing all the files in /var/li
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, D. Joe Anderson wrote:
>
> As per the recommendation below, I'm forwarding this.
>
> - Forwarded message from Andrew Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:23:08 +0100
> From: Andrew Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > - send mail to the bug with a full diff *before* uploading your package to
> > incoming; two minutes before, two hours before, two days before, it
> > doesn't matter
>
> And make sure that the mail has actually left your system... (real life
> exper
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > No, you design the protocol from the beginning to have the first token be a
> > protocol version, followed by a magic number(which could be different per
> > version).
>
> Presumably it's too late for that. :)
Stupid programmers.
--
To UNSUBS
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How else do you handle the case of a library which implements a line
> > protocol (presumably Unix sockets, in this case), and that protocol has
> > changed incompatibly?
>
> You implement the new pr
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, AdeodatoSimó wrote:
> shlibs:Depends=libasound2 (>> 1.0.9), libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1), libfreetype6
> (>= 2.1.5-1), libglu1-xorg | libglu1, libmodplug0c2 (>= 1:0.7-4.1), libogg0
> (>= 1.1.2), libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.8rel), libspeex1, libtheora0, libvorbis0a (>=
> 1.1.0), libxext6 |
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Trygve[UTF-8] Laugstøl wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Trygve Laugstøl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: libjetty4-lib
libjetty4-java is the proper name.
> Version : x.y.z
Er, fill out a version.
> Upstream Author : Greg Wilki
First, I don't know where I should file this bug. Looking for suggestions on
the list.
Second, any ideas on how to fix this problem?
So, I have a system that was created(by debootstrap) between Feb 14 and May
10(dates taken from the libc6 changelog, based on the version installed).
However, I c
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Xavier Roche wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> If a source package "foo", which produces a binary package (say, "bar"),
> also produces an additional "baz" package in an updated version, how this
> should be handled ? Any specific things to do, apart from appending the
> debian/control f
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi Joey,
>
> Your response was very much what I needed to hear. I'll have to retract
> most of my worries.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:20:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > - A personal interest shared by me, tbm, and taggart is to get Debian
> >work
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Henning Makholm wrote:
> In practice it is acceptable for the sponsor to recompute the .diff.gz
> and .dsc using dpkg-buildpackage (which in any case ought to produce
> identical files). But I think the sponsoree should provide a .dsc
> nevertheless, if only to document the ch
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:33:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]:
> > > Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
> > > arch sucks badly. I tend to agree wi
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.19.2140 +0200]:
> > The Berkeley DB storage backend was an enormously stupid thing, but
> > that's been fixed (phew). My main gripe with Subversion now is that
> > if I'm not mistaken (which I coul
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 12:16:24AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > When a new source gets uploaded, it replaces the previous. If several NMUs
> > occur, each one replaces the former. So, when the real maintainer(s) wake
> >
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Regardless of whether or not I agreed with the changes, there is a real
> problem in the sense that my package under revision control is no longer
> in sync with whatever is in the archive. I know that NMUs also pose the
> same problem, but one of
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, W. Borgert wrote:
> [snip]
>
> IX. As alioth becomes even more important to Debian, we will
> have to strengthen (HA-ing) this resource.
>
> X. Teams shall meet online or in sauna. They are allowed to do
>DDR or ballroom dancing.
>
> [Dogme05 is, of course, a pun on D
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, John Hasler wrote:
> Michael writes:
> > Adam, I'm kind of curious what you mean by that
>
> I took it for a joke.
So you take all spam for a joke?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> On 8/2/05, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unsolicited Commercial Email. Please pay the standard $2000 fee for
> > advertisments on Debian mailing lists.
>
> Adam, I'm kind of curious what you mean by
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:32:44PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Bruce Perens wrote:
>
> > > For those of you who are at OSCON, Wednesday night I'm hosting a
> > > recruiting party for Sourcelabs. If
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Oh my goodness, Adam. If I wanted to advertise, I'd ask the DPL for some
> freebies. I must merit them by now.
If you had just said that you were hosting a dinner, that'd be one thing. But
you solicted resumes. That's what pushed it into UCE land.
--
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Bruce Perens wrote:
> For those of you who are at OSCON, Wednesday night I'm hosting a
> recruiting party for Sourcelabs. If you bring your resume I'll buy you
> drinks and some food.
>
> Date: Wednesday, August 3
> Time: 8:30-10:30pm
> Place: Kells Irish Restaurant & Pub, Ulst
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Nikita,
> (Are you a girl maybe?)
What does that have to do with anything? Stop being male-chauvanistic.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, David Pashley wrote:
> On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
> > Hallo Matthew,
> > >
> > > Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
> > > advantage?
> >
> > You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
>
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, sean finney wrote:
> hey,
>
> about a week ago i uploaded a package with priority=high to unstable
> to fix a security-related bug. for some reason, that package hasn't
> yet made it into unstable:
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cacti.html
>
> anyone know more about this
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > I think this can not quite do it, since the chroot will need to be a
> > > woody chroot but get at least partially upgraded in each test to allow
> > > installation of the sarge and sid packages. It looks like piuparts is
> > > otherwise clo
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Well and then what is pending for it?
>
> - DAK support for it;
> - APT support?
apt already supports it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:00:43AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > I just wanted to confirm my recollection that now that stable has been
> > released
> > with support for ~ in package versions in dpkg and apt, we can now use ~ in
> > package vers
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Erik Steffl [2005-06-12 16:25 -0700]:
> > why is there a link to logs in /etc?
> >
> > /etc/postgresql/7.4/main/log is a link to
> > /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-7.4-main.log
>
> The basic idea of the new cluster system was to have the comple
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> A little later than the rest of the architectures, we are now ready to
> announce the availability of CDs (businesscard, netinst and full) and
> DVDs for AMD64.
>
> As AMD64 is unofficial, the URL for downloading the images is slightly
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 6/13/05, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's a stupid argument.
>
> It's not that stupid.
But it is.
> If other files shouldn't be there, the specs should explicitly state that.
Use just a
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 16:25 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> >why is there a link to logs in /etc?
> >
> >/etc/postgresql/7.4/main/log is a link to
> > /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-7.4-main.log
> >
> >/etc is supposed to be for configuration fi
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> The new cogito package (0.11.3+20050610-1) is on its way into sid.
> It does not install /usr/bin/git or /usr/bin/cg, and so it does not
> conflict with git or with cgvg.
>
> I made a note about this in /usr/share/doc/cogito/README.Debian, and I
>
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:42:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > I don't understand what would be wrong with having a symlink in /bin ...
>
> Because this applies to most of the programs in /sbin. It would be easier
> to just merge both directorie
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> > >
> > > > That sounds very nice indeed. If that pans out, and you also fix the UI
> > > > issues (by which I mean I have to type approximately three times as many
> > > > charac
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:38:13 -0500 (CDT),
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >>
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 03 juin 2005 à 18:41 -0500, Adam Heath a écrit :
> > > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should
> > > interact
> > > once installed. But stay the hell away from how they ar
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > >
> > > 3 Future
> > >
> > > * fix the Debian Java Policy;
> > > * upd
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >
> > 3 Future
> >
> > * fix the Debian Java Policy;
> > * update the Debian Java FAQ;
> > * more packages to pkg-java;
> > * every packages to cdbs;
>
>
> Why cdbs?
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hey,
>
> as you've probably heard, Google has a "summer of code" initiative to
> stimulate open source coding. They are looking for mentors to support the
> coders. Shouldn't Debian be on that list?
>
> Matthijs
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/su
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Moore's Law governs the rate at which the speed of hardware (at a given
> price-point) doubles. It says nothing about the speed at which current
> software will *run* on current machines; and it certainly has nothing to say
> about the speed at which s
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:53:24PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > * Package name: ipkungfu
> > Version : 0.5.2
> > Upstream Author : Rocco Sta
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> Hi
> I am subscribed to debian-user, debian-mentors and debian-devel
> lists. I am finding that typically debian-devel and debian-mentors is
> way more spammed than debian-user. Why is it so? Am I just day dreaming
> or is there any reason? Is
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Rapha?l Pinson wrote:
> >> I agree that the previous mail was not very easy to read, nor written in a
> >> great
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The new toolset(tentatively called dbs-ng while I'm developing it) supports
> > what I call pre-patched source.
>
> Was this a April-fools joke, or do you have some code that we can look at?
While there is no code to look at, xen 2.0(in experi
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 10-Apr-05, 10:55 (CDT), Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2005 12:05 AM, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Expect people to whine. I personally don't see why "@daily" is
> > > significantly easier than "0 0
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> su, 2005-03-27 kello 09:01 +0200, George Danchev kirjoitti:
> > I second suggestion given at #250202 and like to see "unpacked" and
> > "patched"
> > targets to hit Policy 4.8.
>
> I hear that Adam Heath
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Julien BLACHE wrote:
>
> > The time it takes to do a release nowadays might very well be related
> > to the use of testing. I tend to think we did better before we
> > introduced testing.
>
> Probably. On the other hand, I think that the coverage
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Paul Hampson wrote:
> * timestamp skew means that the autobuilt makefiles will try
> to rebuild configure from configure.in even if configure is patched by
> dpkg-source at the same time as configure.in
> * A solution for this is in the above-mentioned README.Debian
New
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> >On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> >>On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Henning Glawe wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Moin,
> >>> just discovered a small problem in t
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Adam Heath
>
> | On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> |
> | > apt invokes dpkg on the command line and due to maximum command
> | > line length it sometimes is split in an unfortunate place.
> | >
> |
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
>
> | On 20050228T204520+, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> | > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:49:41PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> | > > On 20050228T164806+, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> | > > > Unfortunately apt breaks the c
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> files.downloaded percent
> i386 1285422 70.5079
> all 504789 27.6886
> powerpc17754 0.9738
> ia64 10111 0.5546
> sparc 3336 0.1830
> arm 850 0.0466
Due to unforseen hardware issues with other machines we host, we need to take
master and murphy offline, install them onto rails. We had planned on
scheduling this, but other problematic hardware has forced to do this on short
notice.
The original rails sent with the machines didn't work in our r
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 07:38:08AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> >> Francesco P. Lovergine writes:
> >> > It depends on programs, sometimes the same usage function is used for
> >> > either --help
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Please be so kind and keep the bug number address in the Cc
>
> Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:24:59PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Is any tetex package installed on the system, and can you give the
> >> vers
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, David Mandelberg wrote:
> GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
> > ... which would mean that it would become unaccessible (and thus
> > meaningless) as the real /var gets mounted later in the boot process.
> > You cannot reliably put it under a directory that is not guaranteed to
> > be on the
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> > It's still sitting in NEW however.
> Nice. I've downloaded the 2.0.4-3 packages from people.d.o and created
> kernel-image-2.6.10 packages with Xen applied. Everybody who is interesed
> in Xen 2.0 can use this APT repository:
>
> deb http:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> how are you? I'm writing again for a Xen 2 update.
>
> How does the packaging of Xen 2.0(.4) proceed ? I've started myself
> the packaging in the hope I can help you with my work.
Er, you aren't paying attention.
xen 2.0.4 was uploaded sat
1 - 100 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
