On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Adam Heath wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > > > > > 3 Future > > > > > > * fix the Debian Java Policy; > > > * update the Debian Java FAQ; > > > * more packages to pkg-java; > > > * every packages to cdbs; > > <SNIP> > > > > Why cdbs? I was under the impression that many people disliked/wer > > uncomfortable with it because of the complex way in which it employs > > makefiles. Wouldn't your packages be more accessible (in terms of other > > developers being able to patch/fix bugs/etc.) in a more universal > > format? > > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should interact > once installed. But stay the hell away from how they are built.
As an example, debhelper, while being very useful for maintainers, is not mandated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
